[Purpose] This study assessed the reliability and validity of an ultrasound-based imaging method for measuring the interspinous process distance in the lumbar spine using two different index points. [Subjects and Methods] Ten healthy males were recruited. Five physical therapy students participated in this study as examiners. The L2–L3 interspinous distance was measured from the caudal end of the L2 spinous process to the cranial end of the L3 spinous process (E-E measurement) and from the top of the L2 spinous process to the top of the L3 spinous process (T-T measurement). Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to estimate the relative reliability. Validity was assessed using a model resembling the living human body. [Results] The reliability study showed no difference in intra-rater reliability between the two measurements. However, the E-E measurement showed higher inter-rater reliability than the T-T measurement (Intraclass correlation coefficients: 0.914 vs. 0.725). Moreover, the E-E measurement method had good validity (Intraclass correlation coefficients: 0.999 and 95% confidence interval for minimal detectable change: 0.29 mm). [Conclusion] These results demonstrate the high reliability and validity of ultrasound-based imaging in the quantitative assessment of lumbar interspinous process distance. Of the two methods, the E-E measurement method is recommended.
The Japanese Society for Bone and Mineral Research developed the Japanese Osteoporosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (JOQOL) to evaluate the disease-specific Health-Related QOL, which is specific for osteoporosis of Japanese patients. JOQOL was revised in 2000; it consisted of 38 items with the scale graded from 0 to 4 and a total full score of 152. To elucidate the reliability and validity of the revised JOQOL, we enrolled 193 postmenopausal women as subjects and diagnosed them as having osteoporosis or osteopenia. The mean age of the subjects was 68.2 +/- 8 years; 58 subjects (30.1%) had at least one vertebral fracture. Among them, 83 patients were retested for reliability. The mean lapse from the time of test to that of retest was 23.7(+/- 9.5) days. The subjects were questioned using the JOQOL, Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36), along with questions on subjects' characteristics and their ADL. The JOQOL scores at the test and the retest were significantly correlated (r = 0.973) without significant difference between their mean scores. All the JOQOL items showed significant correlations at the test and the retest (Kendall's tau = 0.599-0.947). Cronbach's alpha coefficient of JOQOL was 0.918. These results proved the high reliability of JOQOL. The JOQOL score showed negative correlation with age (r = -0.183). The subjects with vertebral fractures had significantly lower JOQOL scores than the subjects without fractures. The JOQOL showed a significant correlation with all the scores in each domain of eight of SF-36 (r = 0.350-0.839). These results were consistent with that of the preceding study. It is concluded that the reliability and the validity of JOQOL were demonstrated in this study.
[Purpose] The intra- and inter-examiner reliabilities of lumbar interspinous process distances measured by ultrasound imaging were examined. [Subjects and Methods] The subjects were 10 males who had no history of orthopedic diseases or dysfunctions. Ten lumbar interspinous images from 360 images captured from 10 subjects were selected. The 10 images were measured by nine examiners. The lumbar interspinous process distance measurements were performed five times by each examiner. In addition, four of the nine examiners measured the distances again after 4 days for test-retest analysis. In statistical analysis, the intraclass correlation coefficient was used to investigate relative reliability, and Bland-Altman analysis was used to investigate absolute reliability. [Results] The intraclass correlation coefficients (1, 1) for intra-examiner reliability ranged from 0.985 to 0.998. For inter-rater reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient (2, 1) was 0.969. The intraclass correlation coefficients (1, 2) for test-retest reliability ranged from 0.991 to 0.999. The Bland-Altman analysis results indicated no systematic error. [Conclusion] The results indicate that ultrasound measurements of interspinous process distance are highly reliable even when measured only once by a single person.
Abstract.[Purpose] Investigation of intra-and inter-measurer errors employing a scapular position measurement method using a tape measure designed by us.[Methods] Two measurers, a physical therapist (RPT) and a student on a physical therapist training course (PTS), measured the scapular position relative to the spine twice using a tape measure, and intra-and inter-measurer measurement errors were investigated. For statistical analysis, Bland-Altman analysis was employed. The limits of agreement (LOA) were determined when a systematic error was present, and the 95% confidence interval of the minimal detectable change (MDC 95 ) was calculated when no systematic error was detected. The significance level was chosen as 5%.[Results] Regarding intra-measurer measurement error, the mean value of the second measurement was greater than that of the first. Regarding inter-measurer error, the mean value measured by PTS was lower than that measured by RPT.[Conclusion] The mean of the first measurement was greater than that of the second measurement as the intra-measurer measurement error of this measurement method, and the mean measured by PTS was lower than that measured by RPT, showing a fixed error. By sufficiently practicing the measurement and applying markers to the bone index points, the measurement error may become small enough to be clinically acceptable.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.