This study aimed to examine the moderating role of institutional theory in the association between participative leadership style and various outcomes, such as employee loyalty and job performance in organizations. A cross-sectional research design was employed, where data were gathered from 347 participants from all managerial levels in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The findings demonstrated how the level of complexity of the institutional theory reduces the positive relationship between participative leadership style and employee loyalty, negatively affecting job performance. The current study contributes to the existing leadership literature by showing that participatory leaders do not behave similarly across various degrees of institutional theory complexity. The findings suggest that the higher the complexity of institutionalism, the wider the gap between leaders and subordinates, so implementing the participative style may become problematic in some circumstances.

This study seeks to explore the impact of specific set of HRM practice on organisational performance in a Middle Eastern emerging market. It aims to examine the mediating role of social exchange within the healthcare sector in Jordan, which is presently reeling under pressure from the refugee crisis from Syria and neighbouring countries. Both, HR and hospital managers were targeted in all private and public hospitals through two separate questionnaires. We find, as predicted, that recruitment, training, and internal promoting from within have a positive and significant effect on performance. However, contrary to expectations, we found performance appraisal and rewards and benefits not linked with performance. Notably, whilst researchers argue that a better theoretical understanding of the mechanisms describing the relationship between HRM and performance should be developed, the results indicate that social exchange can play an essential role in explaining the HRM‐performance indirect relationship – a result that partly unlocks the elements of so‐called ‘black box’ in HR research. The theoretical and applied implications of these findings are explored.

No abstract

No abstract

In this study, we suggest that manager envy will moderate the relationship between perceived overqualification and job-related outcomes (employee turnover, job satisfaction, and performance evaluation). We examined our hypotheses using a sample of 322 employees working in five-star hotels in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), gathered across five time periods. Web-based questionnaires were utilized to collect the data due to the COVID-19 pandemic and in order to obtain results more quickly. We gathered data from June 2021 to February 2022 from superiors at T1 and T4 and subordinates at T2 and T3 in five periods. We left a gap of two weeks between each period, and the same respondents were utilized for all phases. The findings indicate that perceived overqualification was more strongly and negatively related to employee job satisfaction when managers reported high envy. Furthermore, when envy was high, employee overqualification was positively related to job turnover. Promotion had no direct or moderated effects. The implications for the literature on overqualification and envy were addressed. The findings suggest that group-level implications on how perceived overqualification influences employees should be investigated. Perceived overqualification as a result of reporting to envious supervisors had a detrimental impact on the perceived performance and achievement of individuals who were overqualified. The findings also emphasize the relevance of examining overqualification at many levels of analysis, as well as the need to look into manager-level moderators.