Introduction: During the world-wide coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, there is an urgent need to rapidly increase the readiness of hospitals. Emergency departments (EDs) are at high risk of facing unusual situations and need to prepare extensively in order to minimize risks to health care providers (HCPs) and patients. In situ simulation is a well-known method used in training to detect system gaps that could threaten safety. Study Objectives: One objective is to identify gaps, test hospital systems, and inform necessary modifications to the standard processes required by patients with COVID-19 presenting at the hospital. The other objective is to improve ED staff confidence in managing such patients, and to increase their skills in basic and advanced airway management and proper personal protective equipment (PPE) techniques. Methods: This is a quasi-experimental study in which 20 unannounced mock codes were carried out in ED resuscitation and isolation rooms. A checklist was designed, validated, and used to evaluate team performances in three areas: donning, basic and advanced airway skills, and doffing. A pre- and post-intervention survey was used to evaluate staff members’ perceived knowledge of ED procedures related to COVID-19 and their airway management skills. Results: A total of 20 mock codes were conducted in the ED. Overall, 16 issues that posed potential harm to staff or patients were identified and prioritized for immediate resolution. Approximately 57.4% of HCPs felt comfortable dealing with suspected/confirmed, unstable COVID-19 cases after mock codes, compared with 33.3% beforehand (P = .033). Of ED HCPs, 44.4% felt comfortable performing airway procedures for suspected/confirmed COVID-19 cases after mock codes compared with 29.6% beforehand. Performance of different skills was observed to be variable following the 20 mock codes. Skills with improved performance included: request of chest x-ray after intubation (88.0%), intubation done by the most experienced ED physician (84.5%), and correct sequence and procedure of PPE (79.0%). Conclusion: Mock codes identified significant defects, most of which were easily fixed. They included critical equipment availability, transporting beds that were too large to fit through doors, and location of biohazard bins. Repeated mock codes improved ED staff confidence in dealing with patients, in addition to performance of certain skills. In situ simulation proves to be an effective method for increasing the readiness of the ED to address the COVID-19 pandemic and other infection outbreaks.
Mist therapy is not effective in improving clinical symptoms in children presenting to the ED with moderate croup.
A 3‐year‐old girl presented to the primary care clinic at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC) with asymptomatic white discoloration of the vulva of 3 months’ duration. Dysuria, genital itching, and vaginal discharge followed 2 months later. The discharge was yellowish‐greenish in color and occasionally associated with blood‐tinged staining of the underwear. The mother had noted that the genital skin changes had worsened in the last 2 weeks and that the genital itching and dysuria had become more frequent. There was no history of trauma, behavioral problems, abnormal sexual behaviour, encopresis, or any underlying disease. On questioning the mother, the possibility of sexual abuse could not be ruled out as she reported that the father was drug and alcohol dependent and behaved inappropriately when under the influence of these factors. Because of this possibility, the girl and her parents were referred to the suspected child abuse and neglect (SCAN) team at KAMC for further evaluation. The physician, social worker, and child psychiatrist interviewed the girl, her three older brothers, and the parents separately. The girl and her siblings denied any abnormal touching by an adult. The mother reported that she and the father had been separated for 1 year; however, the couple had been reunited for the last month and were currently living together. The mother linked the appearance of the genital changes to the time the father returned; however, no definite history of sexual abuse was obtained. The father denied any sexual or other abnormal encounter with the child. On examination, the child was well developed and well nourished, cooperative, and showed no abnormal fear of genital or anal examination. Genital examination revealed sharply demarcated, hypopigmented, atrophic plaques symmetrically surrounding the labia majora (Fig. 1). Three sharply demarcated, 0.5 cm, nonpalpable, reddish purpuric macules on the medial aspect of both the labia majora and the base of the clitoris were noted (Fig. 2). Two sharply defined healing erosions were noted on the left side distal to the introitus. The hymenal ring could not be seen, but the hymenal orifice was not dilated. The introitus and the anus appeared normal. Because of the genital findings and the mother's concerns, the possibility of sexual abuse was contemplated. Extensive laboratory testing for sexually transmitted diseases, including syphilis, chlamydia, human immunodeficiency virus, and gonorrhea, were negative. Urine analysis and culture were negative. Routine vaginal culture grew group B β‐hemolytic streptococcus, and the patient was treated with amoxicillin‐clavulanate orally for 10 days. Due to a lack of evidence of sexual abuse, the SCAN team decided to follow up the child and to investigate further before reporting to the protective agency. 1 Photograph of the vulva showing atrophic, hypopigmented, sharply defined plaques 2 Photograph of the vulva showing three sharply demarcated purpuric macules on both the labia majora and the base of the clitoris An arrang...
Objective: Occupational safety in healthcare settings is an integral part of treating COVID-19. A growing body of evidence suggests that the inhalation of both respiratory droplets (>5 µm) and tiny aerosols (<5 µm) is a possible route of virus transmission. Recently, innovative barrier enclosures (aerosol boxes) have been designed to cover patients' heads while allowing the implementation of airway management procedures through fitted holes. The initial design has undergone a series of modifications to improve staff safety, operators' ergonomics, and the efficacy of airway procedures. Methods: We reviewed the literature concerning different box modifications and provided an insight into our experience of using the box. Aerosol boxes have garnered the attention of clinicians who are frequently exposed to aerosols while performing aerosol-generating medical procedures, particularly endotracheal intubation. Current evidence comes from simulation-based studies rather than real-life clinical investigations. Results: The reports indicated that the box has significantly reduced the diffusion of aerosols into the room; however, the operators have experienced difficulties in the maneuverability of airway devices. Conclusion: Aerosol boxes should be used for patients necessitating simple elective intubations after healthcare providers are adequately trained. Customized designs can be further made based on clinicians' experiences.
We studied the extent and reasons for non-urgent emergency department (ED) visits in a single university hospital, their predictors, and patient outcomes to propose solutions suitable for Middle Eastern healthcare systems. Design: We conducted a retrospective review of electronic medical records, including all non-and less-urgent ED visits with complete triage records (levels 4 and 5 triage based on the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) over one year. The data on patient demographics, visit characteristics, and patient disposition were analyzed using SPSS software. Setting: The study was conducted in the ED at King Abdullah Bin Abdul-Aziz University Hospital (KAAUH), a Saudi university hospital located within the campus of Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University. Participants: A chart review was carried out for 18,880 patients with CTAS 4 or 5 visiting the KAAUH ED between July 2020 and July 2021. Additionally, a total of "11,857" patients with missing triage acuity or CTAS levels 1, 2, or 3 were excluded from the study. Results: The majority (61.4%) of the 30,737 ED visits were less-urgent or non-urgent. The most common reasons for non-urgent visits were routine examination/investigation (40.9%), medication refilling (14.6%), and upper respiratory tract infection/symptoms (9.9%). Most visits (73.4%) were during weekdays and resulted in the prescription of medication (94.2%), laboratory tests (62.8%), sick leaves (4.7%), radiology examinations (3.6%), and a visit to primary healthcare clinics (family medicine) within a week of the emergency visit (3.6%). Conclusion: Less-and non-urgent ED visits often did not need any further follow-ups or admission and represented a burden better managed by a primary healthcare center. Policymakers should mitigate unnecessary ED visits through public awareness, establish clear regulations for ED visits, improve the quality of care in primary healthcare centers, facilitate booking for outpatient department appointments, and regulate the systems of payment coverage/insurance and referral by other organizations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.