Aims While pulmonary embolism (PE) appears to be a major issue in COVID-19, data remain sparse. We aimed to describe the risk factors and baseline characteristics of patients with PE in a cohort of COVID-19 patients. Methods and results In a retrospective multicentre observational study, we included consecutive patients hospitalized for COVID-19. Patients without computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA)-proven PE diagnosis and those who were directly admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) were excluded. Among 1240 patients (58.1% men, mean age 64 ± 17 years), 103 (8.3%) patients had PE confirmed by CTPA. The ICU transfer and mechanical ventilation were significantly higher in the PE group (for both P < 0.001). In an univariable analysis, traditional venous thrombo-embolic risk factors were not associated with PE (P > 0.05), while patients under therapeutic dose anticoagulation before hospitalization or prophylactic dose anticoagulation introduced during hospitalization had lower PE occurrence [odds ratio (OR) 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14–0.91, P = 0.04; and OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.06–0.18, P < 0.001, respectively]. In a multivariable analysis, the following variables, also statistically significant in univariable analysis, were associated with PE: male gender (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.003–1.069, P = 0.04), anticoagulation with a prophylactic dose (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.79–0.85, P < 0.001) or a therapeutic dose (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.82–0.92, P < 0.001), C-reactive protein (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01–1.04, P = 0.001), and time from symptom onset to hospitalization (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.006–1.038, P = 0.002). Conclusion PE risk factors in the COVID-19 context do not include traditional thrombo-embolic risk factors but rather independent clinical and biological findings at admission, including a major contribution to inflammation.

Higher rates of severe COVID‐19 have been reported in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) compared to non‐transplant patients. We aimed to determine if poorer outcomes were specifically related to chronic immunosuppression or underlying comorbidities. We used a 1:1 propensity score‐matching method to compare survival and severe disease‐free survival (defined as death and/or need for intensive care unit (ICU)) incidence in hospitalized KTRs and non‐transplant control patients between 26 February and 22 May 2020. Patients were matched for risk factors of severe COVID‐19: age, sex, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, preexisting cardiopathy, chronic lung disease and basal renal function. We included 100 KTRs (median age [interquartile range (IQR)]) 64.7 years (55.3‐73.1) in 3 French transplant centers. After a median follow‐up of 13 days (7‐30), transfer to ICU was required for 34 patients (34%) and death occurred in 26 patients (26%). Overall, 43 patients (43%) developed a severe disease during a median follow‐up of 8.5 days (2‐14). Propensity score matching to a large French cohort of 2017 patients hospitalized in 24 centers, revealed that survival was similar between KTRs and matched non‐transplant patients with respective 30‐days survival of 62.9% and 71% (p=0.38) and severe disease‐free 30‐days survival of 50.6% and 47.5% (p=0.91). These findings suggest that severity of COVID‐19 in KTRs is related to their associated comorbidities and not to chronic immunosuppression.

Background COVID‐19 is a respiratory disease associated to thrombotic outcomes with coagulation and endothelial disorders. Based on that, several anticoagulation (AC) guidelines have been proposed. We aimed to identify if AC therapy modifies the risk of developing severe COVID‐19. Methods and Results COVID‐19 patients initially admitted in medical wards of 24 French hospitals were included prospectively from February 26th to April 20th, 2020. We used Poisson regression model, Cox proportional hazard model and matched propensity score to assess the effect of AC on outcomes (intensive care unit (ICU) admission and/or in‐hospital mortality). Study enrolled 2878 COVID‐19 patients, among whom 382 (13.2%) were treated with oral AC therapy prior to hospitalization. After adjustment, AC therapy prior to hospitalization was associated with a better prognosis with an adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) 0.70 (95% CI 0.55‐0.88). Analyses performed using propensity score matching confirmed that AC therapy prior to hospitalization was associated with a better prognosis with an aHR of 0.43 (95% CI 0.29–0.63) for ICU admission and aHR of 0.76 (95% CI 0.61–0.98) for composite criteria ICU admission and/or death. In contrast, therapeutic or prophylactic low or high dose AC started during hospitalization were not associated with any of the outcomes. Conclusions AC therapy used prior to hospitalization in medical wards was associated with a better prognosis in contrast to AC initiated during hospitalization. AC therapy introduced in early step of disease could better prevent COVID‐19‐associated coagulopathy, endotheliopathy and prognosis.

Background While pulmonary embolism (PE) appears to be a major issue in Covid-19, data remain sparse. Purpose We aimed to describe the risk factors and baseline characteristics of patients with PE in a large cohort of Covid-19 patients. Methods In a retrospective multicentric observational study, we included consecutive hospitalised patients for Covid-19. Patients without computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA)-proven PE diagnosis, those who were directly admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU), and those still hospitalised without PE experience were excluded. Results Among 1240 patients (58.1% men, mean age 64 ± 17 years), 103 (8.3%) patients had PE confirmed by CTPA. The ICU transfer requirement and mechanical ventilation requirement were significantly higher in the PE group ( P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). In an univariable analysis, traditional venous thromboembolic risk factors were not associated with PE ( P > 0.05), while patients under therapeutic-dose anticoagulation before hospitalisation or prophylaxis-dose anticoagulation introduced during hospitalisation had lower PE occurrence (OR 0.40, 95%CI(0.14-0.91); P = 0.04 and OR 0.11, 95%CI(0.06-0.18); P < 0.001, respectively). In a multivariable analysis, the following variables (also statistically significant in univariable analysis) were associated with PE: male gender (OR 1.03, 95%CI(1.003-1.069); P = 0.04), anticoagulation with prophylaxis-dose (OR 0.83, 95%CI(0.79-0.85), P < 0.001) or therapeutic-dose (OR 0.87, 95%CI(0.82-0.92), P < 0.001), C-reactive protein (OR 1.03, 95%CI(1.01-1.04), P = 0.001) and time from symptom onset to hospitalisation (OR 1.02, 95%CI(1.006-1.038), P = 0.002) ( Table 1 ). Conclusion Pulmonary embolism risk factors in Covid-19 context do not include traditional thromboembolic risk factors but rather independent clinical and biological findings at admission, including a major contribution to inflammation.

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been associated with coagulation disorders, in particular high concentrations of D-dimers, and increased frequency of venous thromboembolism. Aim: To explore the association between D-dimers at admission and in-hospital mortality in patients hospitalized for COVID-19, with or without symptomatic venous thromboembolism. Methods: From 26 February to 20 April 2020, D-dimer concentration at admission and outcomes (in-hospital mortality or venous thromboembolism) of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in medical wards were analysed retrospectively in a multicentre study in 24 French hospitals. Results: Among 2878 patients enrolled in the study, 1154 (40.1%) patients had D-dimer measurement at admission. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified a D-dimer concentration > 1128 ng/mL as the optimum cut-off value for in-hospital mortality (area under the curve 64.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60–0.69), with a sensitivity of 71.1% (95% CI 0.62–0.78) and a specificity of 55.6% (95% CI 0.52–0.58), which did not differ in the subgroup of patients with venous thromboembolism during hospitalization. Among 545 (47.2%) patients with D-dimer concentration > 1128 ng/mL at admission, 86 (15.8%) deaths occurred during hospitalization. After adjustment, in Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models, D-dimer concentration > 1128 ng/mL at admission was also associated with a worse prognosis, with an odds ratio of 3.07 (95% CI 2.05–4.69; P < 0.001) and an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.11 (95% CI 1.31–3.4; P < 0.01). Conclusions: D-dimer concentration > 1128 ng/mL is a relevant predictive factor for in-hospital mortality in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in a medical ward, regardless of the occurrence of venous thromboembolism during hospitalization.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a public health crisis. Only limited data are available on the characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in France. Aims: To investigate the characteristics, cardiovascular complications and outcomes of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in France. Methods: The Critical COVID-19 France (CCF) study is a French nationwide study including all consecutive adults with a diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2) infection hospitalized in 24 centres between 26 February and 20 April 2020. Patients admitted directly to intensive care were excluded. Clinical, biological and imaging parameters were systematically collected at hospital admission. The primary outcome was in-hospital death. Results: Of 2878 patients included (mean ± SD age 66.6 ± 17.0 years, 57.8% men), 360 (12.5%) died in the hospital setting, of which 7 (20.7%) were transferred to intensive care before death. The majority of patients had at least one (72.6%) or two (41.6%) cardiovascular risk factors, mostly hypertension (50.8%), obesity (30.3%), dyslipidaemia (28.0%) and diabetes (23.7%). In multivariable analysis, older age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03−1.06; P < 0.001), male sex (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.11−2.57; P = 0.01), diabetes (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.12−2.63; P = 0.01), chronic kidney failure (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.02−2.41; P = 0.04), elevated troponin (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.11−2.49; P = 0.01), elevated B-type natriuretic peptide or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.0004−2.86; P = 0.049) and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score ≥ 2 (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.12−2.60; P = 0.01) were independently associated with in-hospital death. Conclusions: In this large nationwide cohort of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in France, cardiovascular comorbidities and risk factors were associated with a substantial morbi-mortality burden.

Background Our study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with and without diabetes admitted to hospital with COVID-19. Methods This retrospective multicentre cohort study comprised 24 tertiary medical centres in France, and included 2851 patients (675 with diabetes) hospitalized for COVID-19 between 26 February and 20 April 2020. A propensity score-matching (PSM) method (1:1 matching including patients’ characteristics, medical history, vital statistics and laboratory results) was used to compare patients with and without diabetes (n = 603 per group). The primary outcome was admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) and/or in-hospital death. Results After PSM, all baseline characteristics were well balanced between those with and without diabetes: mean age was 71.2 years; 61.8% were male; and mean BMI was 29 kg/m 2 . A history of cardiovascular, chronic kidney and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases were found in 32.8%, 22.1% and 6.4% of participants, respectively. The risk of experiencing the primary outcome was similar in patients with or without diabetes [hazard ratio (HR): 1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.95–1.41; P = 0.14], and was 1.29 (95% CI: 0.97–1.69) for in-hospital death, 1.26 (95% CI: 0.9–1.72) for death with no transfer to an ICU and 1.14 (95% CI: 0.88–1.47) with transfer to an ICU. Conclusion In this retrospective study cohort of patients hospitalized for COVID-19, diabetes was not significantly associated with a higher risk of severe outcomes after PSM. Trial registration number : NCT04344327.

Aims Although cardiac involvement has prognostic significance in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and is associated with severe forms, few studies have explored the prognostic role of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). We investigated the link between TTE parameters and prognosis in COVID-19. Methods and results Consecutive patients with COVID-19 admitted to 24 French hospitals were retrospectively included. Comprehensive data, including clinical and biological parameters, were recorded at admission. Focused TTE was performed during hospitalization, according to clinical indication. Patients were followed for a primary composite outcome of death or transfer to intensive care unit (ICU) during hospitalization. Among 2878 patients, 445 (15%) underwent TTE. Most of these had cardiovascular risk factors, a history of cardiovascular disease, and were on cardiovascular treatments. Dilatation and dysfunction were observed in, respectively, 12% (48/412) and 23% (102/442) of patients for the left ventricle, and in 12% (47/407) and 16% (65/402) for the right ventricle (RV). Primary composite outcome occurred in 44% (n = 196) of patients [9% (n = 42) for death without ICU transfer and 35% (n = 154) for admission to ICU]. RV dilatation was the only TTE parameter associated with the primary outcome. After adjustment, male sex [hazard ratio (HR) 1.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09 − 2.25; P = 0.02], higher body mass index (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02 − 1.18; P = 0.01), anticoagulation (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33 − 0.86; P = 0.01), and RV dilatation (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.05 − 2.64; P = 0.03) remained independently associated with the primary outcome. Conclusion Echocardiographic evaluation of RV dilatation could be useful for assessing risk of severe COVID-19 developing in hospitalized patients.