Objective To determine rates of axillary dissection (ALND) and nodal recurrence in patients eligible for ACOSOG Z0011. Summary Background Data Z0011 demonstrated that patients with cT1-2N0 breast cancers and 1–2 involved sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) having breast-conserving therapy (BCT) had no difference in locoregional recurrence or survival after SLN biopsy alone or ALND. The generalizability of the results and importance of nodal radiotherapy (RT) is unclear. Methods Patients eligible for Z0011had SLN biopsy alone. Prospectively defined indications for ALND were metastases in ≥3 SLNs or gross extracapsular extension. Axillary imaging was not routine. SLN and ALND groups and radiation fields were compared with chi-square and t-tests. Cumulative incidence of recurrences was estimated with competing risk analysis. Results From 8/2010–12/2016, 793 patients met Z0011 eligibility criteria and had SLN metastases. 130 (16%) had ALND; ALND did not vary based on age, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, or HER2 status. 5-year event-free survival after SLN alone is 93% with no isolated axillary recurrences. Cumulative 5-year rates of breast+nodal and nodal+distant recurrence were each 0.7%. In 484 SLN-only patients with known RT fields (103 prone, 280 supine tangent, 101 breast+nodes) and follow-up≥12 months, the 5-year cumulative nodal recurrence rate was 1% and did not differ significantly by RT fields. Conclusions We confirm that even without preoperative axillary imaging or routine use of nodal RT, ALND can be avoided in a large majority of Z0011-eligible patients with excellent regional control. This approach has the potential to spare substantial numbers of women the morbidity of ALND.

Background The benefit of neoadjuvant therapy (NAC) in patients with estrogen receptor positive (ER+) HER2− breast cancers and in invasive lobular cancer (ILC) is uncertain due to low rates of pathologic complete response (pCR). Our aim was to determine if pathologic features can identify subsets likely to benefit from NAC. Methods Patients with stage I–III ER+, HER2− breast cancer receiving NAC were retrospectively reviewed. Endpoints were downstaging to breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and nodal pCR after NAC. Patients were grouped by progesterone receptor (PR) status and grade/differentiation (high grade or poor [HP] vs non-HP). Results From 2007–2016, 402 ER+/HER2− cancers in patients receiving NAC were identified. Median age was 50 years, 98% were clinical stage II–III, and 75% cN+. Overall pCR rate was 5%; breast pCR in 7%, nodal pCR in 15% of cN+ patients (p<.0001). Patients with ILC initially ineligible for BCS (n=56) were less likely to downstage than those with ductal (n=183), 16% vs 48% (p≤.0001); with a similar trend in the axilla (p=.086). Rates of BCS eligibility after NAC were highest in PR−/HP (62%) and lowest in PR+/non-HP (29%) patients (p=.005). In the axilla, nodal pCR among cN+ patients (n=301) ranged from 0–35% (p<.0001) within these groups, and was most frequent in PR−/HP patients. Conclusions ER+/HER2− patients most likely to benefit from NAC are those with PR− and HP tumors. Patients with ILC are unlikely to downstage in the breast or axilla compared to IDC. Use of these criteria can assist in defining initial treatment approach.

No abstract

Our data suggest that donor site, regardless of volume injected or tissue radiation, did not affect volume retention in fat grafting. Longer-term studies are needed to assess the stability of the breast after fat grafting.

Unilateral breast reconstruction poses a special set of challenges to the reconstructive breast surgeon compared to bilateral reconstructions. No studies to date provide an objective comparison between autologous and implant based reconstructions in matching the contralateral breast. This study compares the quantitative postoperative results between unilateral implant and autologous flap reconstructions in matching the native breast in shape, size, and projection using three-dimensional (3D) imaging. Sixty-four patients who underwent unilateral mastectomy with tissue expander (TE)-implant (n = 34) or autologous microvascular free transverse rectus abdominus myocutaneous (TRAM; n = 18) or deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP; n = 12) flap (n = 30) reconstruction from 2007 to 2010 were analyzed. Key patient demographics and risk factors were collected. Using 3D scans of patients obtained during pre and postoperative visits including over 1 year follow-ups for both groups, 3D models were constructed and analyzed for total breast volume, anterior-posterior projection from the chest wall, and 3D comparison. No significant differences in mean age, body mass index, or total number of reconstructive surgeries were observed between the two groups (TE-implant: 52.2 ± 10, 23.9 ± 3.7, 3 ± 0.9; autologous: 50.7 ± 9.4, 25.4 ± 3.9, 2.9 ± 1.3; p > 0.05). The total volume difference between the reconstructed and contralateral breasts in the TE-implant group was insignificant: 27.1 ± 22.2 cc, similar to the autologous group: 29.5 ± 24.7 cc, as was the variance of breast volume from the mean. In both groups, the reconstructed breast had a larger volume. A-P projections were similar between the contralateral and the reconstructed breasts in the TE-implant group: 72.5 ± 3.21 mm versus 71.7 ± 3.5 mm (p > 0.05). The autologous reconstructed breast had statistically insignificant but less A-P projection compared to the contralateral breast (81.9 ± 16.1 mm versus 61.5 ± 9.5 mm; p > 0.05). Variance of A-P projection from the mean was additionally insignificant between the contralateral and reconstructed breasts. Both groups produced similar asymmetry scores based on global 3D comparison (TE-implant: 2.24 ± 0.3 mm; autologous: 1.96 ± 0.2 mm; p > 0.05). Lastly, when the autologous group was further subdivided into TRAM and DIEP cohorts, no significant differences in breast volume, A-P projection or symmetry existed. Using 3D imaging, we demonstrate that both TE-implant and autologous reconstruction can achieve symmetrical surgical results with the same number of operations. This study demonstrates that breast symmetry, while an important consideration in the breast reconstruction algorithm, should not be the sole consideration in a patient' decision to proceed with autologous versus TE-implant reconstruction.