Background Subjective oral symptoms, especially if recurrent, might lead to termination of an oral food challenge (OFC) for fear of a subsequent severe reaction. Methods In a single‐center retrospective cohort study, oral food challenges to milk, egg, peanut, sesame, or tree nuts performed between January 2016 and January 2018 in patients aged ≥3 years, at the Institute of Allergy, Immunology and Pediatric Pulmonology in Shamir Medical Center, were analyzed. Subjective oral symptoms during the challenge were documented, and their association with the challenge outcome was examined. Results A total of 323 patients underwent 652 oral food challenges to the investigated foods (milk, 71; egg, 22; peanut, 48; sesame, 24; and tree nuts, 487). Subjective oral symptoms were experienced in 237 (36.3%) of all OFCs performed, and their rate was comparable across most foods tested. The rate of positive challenges was significantly higher when subjective oral symptoms were experienced during the challenge than when they were not (69.6% vs 30.4%, respectively, P < .001). However, the false‐positive rate of such symptoms in predicting a positive food challenge was 30.3% for all foods; peanut, 40%; sesame, 27.3%; milk, 35.5%; egg, 33%; and tree nuts, 28.4%. Overall, subjective oral symptoms (SOS) provided sensitivity of 56.7, specificity 80.4, PPV 69.6, and NPV 69.0 for predicting OFC outcome. Importantly, reactions during positive challenges with and without subjective oral symptoms were comparable to severity. Conclusions Continuing OFCs with subjective oral symptoms is recommended for it will prevent false‐positive results in a third of cases without increasing patients' risk.
This study assessed the correlation between the magnitude of the elevation in maternal serum human chorionic gonadotropin (MShCG) levels and pregnancy complications. Among 80,716 screened pregnancies, 120 with moderately elevated MShCG (3.00-5.99 MoM) were compared to 84 with extremely elevated MShCG >6.00 MoM. A control series of 120 women with normal MShCG (<3.00 MoM) were matched. Rates of intrauterine growth restriction, preterm labour, antepartum foetal death (APFD), pre-eclampsia, and placental abruption were analysed. We found that the study group had more adverse outcomes than the control group (73/204 [36%] vs. 18/120 [15%]; p < .0001). The rate was higher in the extremely elevated group than in the moderately elevated group (43/84 [51%] vs. 30/120 [25%]; p < .0001). All 12 cases of APFD (14%) occurred among the extremely elevated series. In conclusion, adverse pregnancy outcomes are more common in women with extremely elevated MShCG. The patients should receive counselling regarding this trend and undergo close pregnancy monitoring. Impact statement • What is already known on this subject?In addition to its contribution to Down syndrome (DS) screening, maternal serum human chorionic gonadotropin (MShCG) levels are a marker for pregnancy complications such as intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), preterm labour (PTL), antepartum fatal death (APFD), pre-eclampsia (PE), placental abruption (PA) and fetal malformations with or without chromosomal aberrations. • What the results of this study add? We found that in the presence of elevated MShCG levels, the incidence of IUGR and PTL increased. PE increased clinically, but statistical significance was seen only when MShCG was extremely elevated (≥ 6.00 MoM). APFD and PA were associated with very high MShCG levels only. • What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Women with high MShCG levels should be counselled. In case of very high levels (≥ 6.00 MoM), the risk of APFD and PA should be discussed. The pregnancy should be monitored for IUGR, PTL and PE. In view of the limited number of enrolled patients with very high levels of MShCG, the experience of other institutions is needed to corroborate these findings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.