Morphology and its relevance for systematics is a promising field for the application of biosemiotic principles in scientific practice. Genital coupling in spiders involves very complex interactions between the male and female genital structures. As exemplified by two spider species, Nephila clavipes and Nephila pilipes ssp. fenestrata, from a biosemiotic point of view the microstructures of the male bulb’s embolus and the corresponding female epigynal and vulval parts form the morphological zone of an intraspecific communication and sign-interpreting process that is one of the prerequisites for sperm transfer. Hence these morphological elements are of high taxonomic value, as they play an essential role in mating and fertilization and consequently in establishing and preserving a reproductive community. Morphology clearly benefits from a biosemiotic approach, as biosemiotics helps to sort out species-specific morphological characters and to avoid problematic typological interpretations.
A common male adaptation to prevent sperm competition is the placement of a mating plug. Such plugs are considered as an extreme investment if they comprise parts of the genital systems and render the male sterile. Genital mutilation occurs in monogynous spiders of several families and may co‐occur with permanent sperm depletion, meaning that sperm production is terminated once males become mature. Within the orb‐web spider genus Nephila, monogynous mating strategies are considered ancestral, although some species have reverted to a polygynous mating strategy. Although genital mutilation does not occur in these species, permanent sperm depletion (PSD) remained. We compared investment in sperm between an effectively plugging (Nephila fenestrata Thorell, 1859) and a closely‐related nonplugging species [Nephila senegalensis (Walckenaer, 1841)]. Sperm investment should be higher in N. senegalensis because males are able to mate with several females, whereas N. fenestrata males can only achieve a maximum of two copulations, generally performed with the same female. The absence of a plugging mechanism in N. senegalensis and the inability to monopolize females by means of mating plugs results in a higher risk of sperm competition. Thus, we predicted higher investment in sperm producing tissue and larger sperm storage organs in males of N. senegalensis compared to N. fenestrata. We examined the testes and deferent ducts of both species for size and cell‐quality differences using light and transmission electron microscopy and analyzed the volume of the sperm reservoir in the male copulatory organ (i.e. spermophor) using X‐ray microcomputed tomography. In contrast to our prediction, the lumen of testes, deferent ducts, and spermophor of N. senegalensis males were significantly smaller than in N. fenestrata.
A biosemiotic approach of interpreting morphological data is apt to reveal morphological traits whose key role in intraspecific communication processes, such as specific mate recognition, has been overlooked so far. Certain genital structures of the haplogyne spider Dysdera erythrina (Walckenaer, 1802) serve as an example. In Dysdera erythrina the semi-circular sclerite at the tip of the male’s bulb fits exactly into the anterior diverticulum of the female’s endogyne. From the viewpoint of biosemiotics, which studies the production and interpretation of signs and codes in living systems, these structures are considered the morphological zones of an intraspecific communication process which forms one of the necessary prerequisites for sperm transfer and achievement of fertilisation. Thus, a biosemiotics-based species delimitation approach with its peculiar form of evaluation of morphological structures yields new insights for the multidisciplinary undertaking of modern integrative taxonomy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.