This studytested a school-based intervention developed for use with urban minority youth vulnerable to multiple negative developmental outcomes. A quasi-experimental design (pre-and post-follow-up with matched comparison condition) was used to evaluate the impact of the intervention on promoting positive change in four developmental domains (skills/knowledge, attitudes, orientations, exploration/commitment) related to identitydevelopment. The final set of participants comprised a matched sample of 92 youngsters, 46 in the intervention and 46 in the comparison condition. Quantitative results indicated that the intervention condition showed positive and significant gains from pre-to posttest on multiple indices, with a tendencytoward the “leveling off” of intervention gains at follow-up. A qualitative assessment of the impact of the intervention illustrated positive effects of the intervention as well as the possible obstacles to intervention efficacy.

No abstract

The Miami Youth Development Project (YDP) had its beginnings in the early 1990s as a grassroots response to the needs of troubled (multiproblem) young people in the community (Arnett, Kurtines, & Montgomery, 2008, this issue). YDP is an important outcome of efforts to create positive youth development interventions that draw on the strengths of developmental intervention science outreach research in the development of community-supported positive development programs (i.e., an approach that focuses on meeting community needs as well as youth needs by generating innovative knowledge of evidence-based change intervention strategies that are feasible, affordable, and sustainable in “real world” settings, (Kurtines, Ferrer-Wreder, Cass Lorente, Silverman, Montgomery, 2008, this issue). Now completing its second decade, YDP represents an effort to bring together a more empowering model of knowledge development for research involvement in the community, a nuanced and contextualized notion of youth and their development, and methodologies that richly reflect rather than reduce the experiences of the young people whose development the authors seek to promote.

The Illness Attitude Scales (IAS) were simplified from a 5-point Likert-type scale to a yes-or-no format and translated into Spanish using Brislin's method. Because of the linkage between hypochondriasis and depression, the new version was administered to immigrant, Hispanic, older adults suffering from major depressive disorder (MDD) (n = 21) and their controls (n = 21), and to non-Hispanic older adults with MDD (n = 32) and their controls (n = 32). Both versions of the IAS were equivalent and had adequate internal consistency. As hypothesized, Hispanic immigrants with MDD endorsed more hypochondriacal beliefs and were more concerned about the effect of their symptoms than controls. Non-Hispanics were more concerned about pain than controls. The two IAS simplified versions will be useful in the assessment of English-and Spanish-speaking older adults in both clinical and research settings.

Arrufat, Ondina, "The refinement and validation of the critical decision making and problem solving scale moral dilema (CDP-MD)" (1995 to my mother, whose only wish was to see me doing it;and to my daughter, who couldn't wait for the day that it was done.iii