One of the most important stages in biofuel production from microalgae is the harvesting and dewatering of the microalgal biomass. The lack of cost-effective methodologies has been the major hurdle for the economic production of algal biofuel production. The variability in the properties of microalgal species such as cell size, robustness, surface charge, culture medium constituent [1] and desired end product [2] pose challenges to generic engineering implementation across the range of biomass feedstock and biorefinery processing. These properties influence algal recovery processes and therefore play a key role in the selection of suitable recovery methods. Furthermore, given the typical dilute nature of algal media (although more concentrated than freshwater supplies processed by dissolved air flotation), recycling of medium after cell recovery must be considered to avoid disposal challenges and ultimately to save costs.In order to overcome these challenges, highly robust, effective and energy-efficient harvesting techniques must be sought to meet the high volumetric throughput of large-scale production. A number of recovery methods exist and have been investigated for various microalgal species. Filtration, for instance, is a relatively cost-effective technique suitable for large filamentous algae such as Spirulina [2], but the shape and size (2-50 µm) [1] of lipid-rich unicellular microalgae such as Dunaliella salina or Chlorella make effective filtration difficult [2]. Similarly, sedimentation is a very slow recovery technique and often requires significant space for settling tanks.Unlike filtration and sedimentation, the use of centrifugal force for algal separation from culture medium is a rapid and relatively more effective recovery technique. In spite of the high recovery with this approach, the major disadvantage of centrifugation is the high capital and operational costs associated with sophisticated machinery and their high energetic consumption [1,3]. In addition, the high shear and gravitational force resulting from centrifugation could be detrimental to fragile microalgal cells, affecting the quality of the end products. Background:Harvesting algal biomass is an important unit operation in the production of biofuel from algae. However, many of the known techniques available for harvesting and dewatering microalgal biomass are energy intensive and in some cases intrusive and inefficient. Here we show that microflotation mediated by fluidic oscillation is an approach that differs from dissolved air flotation by the nonintrusive laminar flow approach, as well as low energy consumptions, and is also different from dispersed air flotation by the method of bubble generation. Results and discussion: Using three metallic coagulant types, recovery efficiencies of 99.2, 98.1 and 95.2% were obtained for ferric chloride, ferric sulfate and aluminum sulfate, respectively. The benchmarks in the literature for dissolved air flotation are 40-98%. Conclusion: Biofuel production from microalgae can be facilitated ...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.