Cellular immortalization is one of the prerequisite steps in carcinogenesis. By gene expression profiling, we have found that genes in the interferon (IFN) pathway were dysregulated during the spontaneous cellular immortalization of fibroblasts from Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) patients with germ-line mutations in p53. IFN signaling pathway genes were down-regulated by epigenetic silencing during immortalization, and some of these same IFN-regulated genes were activated during replicative senescence. Bisulfite sequencing of the promoter regions of two IFN regulatory transcription factors (IRF5 and IRF7) revealed that IRF7, but not IRF5, was epigenetically silenced by methylation of CpG islands in immortal LFS cells. The induction of IRF7 gene by IFNA in immortal LFS cells was potentiated by pretreatment with the demethylation agent 5-aza-2 ¶-deoxycytidine. Overexpression of IRF5 and IRF7 revealed that they can act either alone or in tandem to activate other IFN-regulated genes. In addition, they serve to inhibit the proliferation rate and induce a senescence-related phenotype in immortal LFS cells. Furthermore, polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid treatment of the IRF-overexpressing cells showed a more rapid induction of several IFN-regulated genes. We conclude that the epigenetic inactivation of the IFN pathway plays a critical role in cellular immortalization, and the reactivation of IFN-regulated genes by transcription factors IRF5 and/or IRF7 is sufficient to induce cellular senescence. The IFN pathway may provide valuable molecular targets for therapeutic interventions at early stages of cancer development. (Mol Cancer Res 2008;6(5):770 -84)
Learning Objectives: On successful completion of this activity, participants should be able to discuss (1) the radiopharmaceuticals used to evaluate cell proliferation; (2) the normal biodistribution of these radiopharmaceuticals; and (3) the role of these radiopharmaceuticals in the evaluation of malignancies.
The kinetics of 1-(29-deoxy-29-fluoro-b-D-arabinofuranosyl)thymine (FMAU) were studied using PET to determine the most appropriate and simplest approach to image acquisition and analysis. The concept of tumor retention ratio (TRR) is introduced and validated. Methods: Ten patients with brain (n 5 4) or prostate (n 5 6) tumors were imaged using 18 F-FMAU PET (mean dose, 369 MBq). Sixty-minute dynamic images were obtained; this was followed by whole-body images. Mean and maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmean and SUVmax, respectively) of each tumor were determined as the mean over 3 planes of each time interval. For kinetic analyses, blood activity was measured in 18 samples over 60 min. Samples were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography at 3 selected times to determine tracer metabolites. FMAU kinetics were measured using a 3-compartment model yielding the flux (K1 · k3/(k2 1 k3)) (K1, k2, and k3 are rate constants) and compared with TRR measurements. TRR was calculated as the tumor 18 F-FMAU uptake area under the curve divided by the product of blood 18 F-FMAU AUC and time. A similar analysis was performed using muscle to estimate 18 F-FMAU delivery. Results: SUVmean measurements obtained from 5 to 11 min correlated with those obtained from 30 to 60 min (r 2 5 0.92, P , 0.0001) and 50 to 60 min (r 2 5 0.92, P , 0.0001) due to the rapid clearance of 18 F-FMAU. Similar results were obtained using SUVmax measurements (r 2 5 0.93, P , 0.0001; r 2 5 0.88, P , 0.0001, respectively). The measurement of TRR using either blood or muscle activity over 11 min provided results comparable to those of 60-min dynamic imaging and a 3-compartment model. This analysis required only 5 blood samples drawn at 1, 2, 3, 5, and 11 min without metabolite correction to produce comparable results. Conclusion: Tissue retention ratio measurements obtained over 11 min can replace flux measurements in 18 F-FMAU imaging. The SUVmean and the SUVmax in 5-11 min images correlated well with those of images obtained at 50-60 min. The quality of the images and tissue kinetics in 11 min of imaging makes it a desirable and shorter tumor imaging option.
Purpose-Fluoropyrimidines like 1-(2 -deoxy-2 -fluoro--D-arabinofuranosyl)-thymine (FMAU) and 3 -deoxy-3 -fluorothymidine (FLT) accumulate in tumors and are being used as positron emission tomography tumor-imaging tracers. Proliferating tissues with high thymidine kinase 1 (TK1) activity retain FLT; however, the mechanism of selective accumulation of FMAU in tumors and certain other tissues requires further study.Methods-Retention of [ 3 H]FLT and [ 3 H]FMAU was measured in prostate cancer cell lines PC3, LNCaP, DU145, and the breast cancer cell line MD-MBA-231, and the tracer metabolites were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). FMAU retention, thymidine kinase 2 (TK2) activity, and mitochondrial mass were determined in cells stressed by depleted cell culture medium or by treating with oxidative, reductive, and energy stress, or specific adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase activator, or eIF2 inhibitor. TK1 and TK2 activities and mitochondrial mass were determined by FLT phosphorylation, 1--D-arabinofuranosylthymine (Ara-T) phosphorylation, and flow cytometry, respectively.Results-FMAU retention in rapidly proliferating cancer cell lines was five to ten times lower than FLT after 10 min incubation. HPLC analysis of the cellular extracts showed that phosphorylated tracers are the main retained metabolites. Nutritional stress decreased TK1 activity and FLT retention but increased retained FMAU. TK2 inhibition decreased FMAU retention and phosphorylation with negligible effects on FLT. Oxidative, reductive, or energy stress increased FMAU retention and correlated with mitochondrial mass (r 2 = 0.88, p=0.006). FMAU phosphorylation correlated with increased TK2 activity (r 2 =0.87, p=0.0002).Conclusion-FMAU is preferably phosphorylated by TK2 and can track TK2 activity and mitochondrial mass in cellular stress. FMAU may provide an early marker of treatment effects.
Background: Isolated brain metastasis (IBM) from cervical cancer is a very rare encounter in neurosurgery. We sought to understand how patients with isolated brain metastases differ from those with metastases in the setting of widespread disease. Methods: A systematic review was completed using PubMed and the Cochrane Library. Patients with isolated brain metastases (IBM) and non-isolated brain metastases (NIBM, or brain metastases in the setting of disseminated disease), were compared. Two-sided statistical tests were used to determine significance. Survival function was carried out using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: A total of 89 patients, 25 with IBM and 64 with NIBM, were identified. The time interval between initial diagnosis of cervical cancer and diagnosis of brain lesion was significantly shorter in the IBM group (median 7.5 vs. 20.05 months, and IBM vs. NIBM, respectively; P = 0.006). Overall survival from initial diagnosis of cervical cancer was significantly shorter for the IBM group versus the NIBM group (7.63 vs. 26.3 months, respectively; P = 0.0005). Data demonstrate a 3.4-fold reduction of median life expectancy to 7.63 months. Survival after diagnosis of brain metastases did not differ between groups (median, IBM 7 months vs. NIBM 4 months, P = 0.08). Conclusion: Taken together, our data suggest that for cervical cancer patients with brain metastasis intracranial metastasis itself (and not overall tumor burden) represent a sentinel event in limiting longevity. While the present study is underpowered to compare treatment options directly, further work should be focused on determining the optimal treatment for these patients.
FMAU tracer was able to detect bone metastases in CRPC patients but uptake was highly variable in bony lesions. Zoledronic acid did not produce an appreciable change in scans. Future investigations of FMAU tracer as a marker of early response in CRPC is recommended.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.