Introduction The costs associated with cancer diagnosis, treatment and care present enormous financial toxicity. However, evidence of financial toxicity associated with cancer in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is scarce. Aim To determine the prevalence, determinants and how financial toxicity has been measured among cancer patients in LMICs. Methods Four electronic databases were searched to identify studies of any design that reported financial toxicity among cancer patients in LMICs. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to derive the pooled prevalence of financial toxicity. Sub-group analyses were performed according to costs and determinants of financial toxicity. Results A total of 31 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of objective financial toxicity was 56.96% (95% CI, 30.51, 106.32). In sub-group meta-analyses, the objective financial toxicity was higher among cancer patients with household size of more than four (1.17% [95% CI, 1.03, 1.32]; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%), multiple cycles of chemotherapy (1.94% [95% CI, 1.00, 3.75]; p = 0.05; I2 = 43%) and private health facilities (2.87% [95% CI, 1.89, 4.35]; p < 0.00001; I2 = 26%). Included studies hardly focused primarily on subjective measures of financial toxicity, such as material, behavioural and psychosocial. One study reported that 35.4% (n = 152 of 429) of cancer patients experienced high subjective financial toxicity. Conclusions This study indicates that cancer diagnosis, treatment and care impose high financial toxicity on cancer patients in LMICs. Further rigorous research on cancer-related financial toxicity is needed.
The ERG1A K+ channel, which is partially responsible for repolarization of the cardiac action potential, has also been reported in skeletal muscle where it modulates ubiquitin proteolysis. Because ERG1A protein appears variably expressed in muscles composed of mixed fiber types, we hypothesized that its abundance in skeletal muscle might differ with fiber type. Indeed, skeletal muscle fibers vary in speed of contraction (fast or slow), which is mainly determined by myosin heavy chain (MyHC) isoform content, but a sarcolemmal K+ channel might also modulate contraction speed. To test our hypothesis, we cryo-sectioned Soleus (SOL), Extensor Digitorum Longus (EDL), and Gastrocnemius muscles from five rats. These muscles were chosen because the SOL and EDL contain an abundance of slow- and fast-twitch fibers, respectively, while the Gastrocnemius has a more heterogeneous composition. The muscle sections were co-immunostained for the ERG1A protein and either the fast- or slow-twitch MyHC to identify fiber type. ERG1A fluorescence was then measured in the sarcolemma of each fiber type and compared. The data reveal that the ERG1A protein is more abundant in the fibers of the SOL than in the EDL muscles, suggesting ERG1A may be more abundant in the slow than the fast fibers, and this was confirmed with immunoblot. However, because of the homogeneity of fiber type within these muscles, it was not possible to get enough data from both fiber types within a single muscle to compare ERG1A composition within fiber type. However, immunohistochemistry of sections from the fiber type heterogeneous Gastrocnemius muscle reveals that slow fibers had, on average, a 17.2% greater ERG1A fluorescence intensity than fast fibers (p<0.03). Further, immunoblot reveals that ERG1A protein is 41.6% more abundant (p=0.051) in old than in young rat Gastrocnemius muscle. We postulate that this membrane bound voltage-gated channel may affect membrane characteristics, the duration of the action potential generated, and/or the speed of contraction. Indeed, ERG1A protein is more abundant in aged and atrophic skeletal muscle, both of which exhibit slower rates of contraction.
Introduction: The costs associated with cancer diagnosis, treatment and care present enormous financial toxicity. However, evidence of financial toxicity associated with cancer in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) is scarce.Aim: To identify the extent of cancer-related financial toxicity and how it has been measured in LMICs.Methods: Four electronic databases were searched to identify studies of any design that reported financial toxicity among cancer patients in LMICs. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to derive the pooled prevalence of financial toxicity. Sub-group analyses were performed according to: costs; and determinants of financial toxicity.Results: A total of 31 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of financial toxicity was 56.96% [95% CI, 30.51, 106.32]. In sub-group meta-analyses, the financial toxicity was higher among cancer patients with household size of more than four (1.17% [95% CI, 1.03, 1.32]; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%), multiple cycles of chemotherapy (1.94% [95% CI, 1.00, 3.75]; p = 0.05; I2 = 43%) and private health facilities (2.87% [95% CI, 1.89, 4.35]; p < 0.00001; I2 = 26%). Mean medical costs per cancer patients were $2,740.18 [95% CI, $1,953.62, $3,526.74]. The ratio of cost of care to gross domestic product (GDP) per capita varied considerably across the LMICs included in this review, which ranged from 0.06 in Vietnam to 327.65 in Ethiopia.Conclusions: This study indicates that cancer diagnosis, treatment and care impose high financial toxicity on cancer patients in LMICs. Further rigorous research on cancer-related financial toxicity is needed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.