Introduction: Scabies is a contagious skin infestation that mainly presents with itching at night and skin burrows that are visible to the naked eye. Diagnosing scabies with dermoscopy is still a matter of controversy. The aim of our study was to compare the diagnostic properties of adhesive tape, skin scraping, and dermoscopy in diagnosing scabies. Methods: One hundred patients with clinical presumptive diagnoses of scabies underwent skin scraping, adhesive tape testing, and dermoscopic examination. Each diagnostic procedure was performed on three different areas. Results: Comparing the diagnostic properties of the three methods, the adhesive tape test was the most sensitive method for diagnosing scabies. Sixteen cases (16.0%) were definitely diagnosed as scabies using the adhesive tape test detecting the presence of mites or their eggs. Only 10 cases (10.0%) were definitely diagnosed as scabies using the skin scraping test detecting mites or their eggs. Dermoscopic examination suggested a diagnosis of scabies in 22 cases (22.0%), of which only 10 were definitely diagnosed as scabies by detecting mites using the adhesive tape test, skin scraping, or both. Conclusion: The diagnosis of scabies can only be confirmed by seeing mites. The adhesive tape test and skin scraping procedure have high specificity in diagnosing scabies, but their low sensitivity cannot exclude the possibility of scabies. Dermoscopy-guided tape testing can be a helpful tool for better diagnosis of scabies.

Pulsed‐dye laser (PDL) is the treatment of choice for port wine stain (PWS), and the development of purpura is considered a therapeutic endpoint. Changes in PWS vasculature observed by dermoscopy immediately after laser irradiation have been suggested to predict the minimal effective fluence. The current study aimed at comparing these changes with purpura as a therapeutic endpoint. Fifty‐six PWS patients, randomized into two groups, received five monthly PDL sessions (595 nm and 10 mm spot size). At the first visit, patients received multiple gradually increasing test irradiations. Patients in the first group were treated with the lowest dose that resulted in 24‐hr‐lasting purpura, while patients in the second group were treated with the lowest dose that resulted in vessel disappearance observed by dermoscope. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups (the dermoscopic and the purpuric) regarding mean average improvement (42.4 and 37.32%, respectively, p = .32), grade of improvement (p = .44), and the rate of side effects (0 and 13.79%, respectively, p = .13). In conclusion, the immediate post‐irradiation vessel disappearance (detected by dermoscope) is comparable, in safety and efficacy, to purpura as a therapeutic endpoint and maybe more time‐saving and more accepted cosmetically.