Andesites represent a large proportion of the magmas erupted at continental arc volcanoes and are regarded as a major component in the formation of continental crust. Andesite petrogenesis is therefore fundamental in terms of both volcanic hazard and differentiation of the Earth. Andesites typically contain a significant proportion of crystals showing disequilibrium petrographic characteristics indicative of mixing or mingling between silicic and mafic magmas, which fuels a long-standing debate regarding the significance of these processes in andesite petrogenesis and ultimately questions the abundance of true liquids with andesitic composition. Central to this debate is the distinction between liquids (or melts) and magmas, mixtures of liquids with crystals, which may or may not be co-genetic. With this distinction comes the realization that bulk-rock chemical analyses of petrologically complex andesites can lead to a blurred picture of the fundamental processes behind arc magmatism. Here we present an alternative view of andesite petrogenesis, based on a review of quenched glassy melt inclusions trapped in phenocrysts, whole-rock chemistry, and high-pressure and high-temperature experiments. We argue that true liquids of intermediate composition (59 to 66 wt% SiO(2)) are far less common in the sub-volcanic reservoirs of arc volcanoes than is suggested by the abundance of erupted magma within this compositional range. Effective mingling within upper crustal magmatic reservoirs obscures a compositional bimodality of melts ascending from the lower crust, and masks the fundamental role of silicic melts (>/=66 wt% SiO(2)) beneath intermediate arc volcanoes. This alternative view resolves several puzzling aspects of arc volcanism and provides important clues to the integration of plutonic and volcanic records.

No abstract

No abstract

An up to 180 m-thick debris avalanche deposit related to Ferrar large igneous province magmatism is observed at central Allan Hills, Antarctica. This Jurassic debris avalanche deposit forms the lower part (member m 1 ) of the Mawson Formation and is overlain by thick volcaniclastic layers containing a mixture of basaltic and sedimentary debris (member m 2 ). The m 1 deposit consists of a chaotic assemblage of breccia panels and megablocks up to 80 m across. In contrast to m 2 , it is composed essentially of sedimentary material derived from the underlying Beacon Supergroup. The observed structures and textures suggest that the breccias in m 1 were mostly produced by progressive fragmentation of megablocks during transport but also to a lesser extent by disruption and ingestion of the substrate by the moving debris avalanche. The upper surface of the debris avalanche deposit lacks large hummocks, and sandstone breccias dominate volumetrically over megablocks within the deposits. This indicates pervasive and relatively uniform fragmentation of the moving mass, and probably reflects the weak and relatively homogenous nature of the material involved. The avalanche flowed into a pre-existing topographic depression carved into the Beacon sequence, and flow indicators reveal a northeastward movement. The source area is probably now hidden under the Antarctic ice sheet. Sparse basaltic bodies, which were hot and plastic during transport in m 1 , reveal the role of Ferrar magmatism in triggering the avalanche, possibly in relation to the emplacement of large sub-surface intrusions. The documented deposits indicate that debris avalanches are among the various phenomena that can accompany the early stages of large igneous province magmatism, despite the common absence of large central volcanic edifices. Where large igneous provinces develop in association with faulting, or slow pre-eruptive uplift accompanied by deep valley incision, there is a high probability that feeder dikes will approach the surface in areas of steep topography, allowing volcano-seismicity and fluid overpressures associated with intrusion to effectively trigger avalanches.