Aim The aim of this paper is to describe the clinical features of COVID‐19‐related encephalopathy and their metabolic correlates using brain 2‐desoxy‐2‐fluoro‐D‐glucose (FDG)‐positron‐emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging. Background and purpose A variety of neurological manifestations have been reported in association with COVID‐19. COVID‐19‐related encephalopathy has seldom been reported and studied. Methods We report four cases of COVID‐19‐related encephalopathy. The diagnosis was made in patients with confirmed COVID‐19 who presented with new‐onset cognitive disturbances, central focal neurological signs, or seizures. All patients underwent cognitive screening, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), lumbar puncture, and brain 2‐desoxy‐2‐fluoro‐D‐glucose (FDG)‐positron‐emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) (FDG‐PET/CT). Results The four patients were aged 60 years or older, and presented with various degrees of cognitive impairment, with predominant frontal lobe impairment. Two patients presented with cerebellar syndrome, one patient had myoclonus, one had psychiatric manifestations, and one had status epilepticus. The delay between first COVID‐19 symptoms and onset of neurological symptoms was between 0 and 12 days. None of the patients had MRI features of encephalitis nor significant cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) abnormalities. SARS‐CoV‐2 RT‐PCR in the CSF was negative for all patients. All patients presented with a consistent brain FDG‐PET/CT pattern of abnormalities, namely frontal hypometabolism and cerebellar hypermetabolism. All patients improved after immunotherapy. Conclusions Despite varied clinical presentations, all patients presented with a consistent FDG‐PET pattern, which may reflect an immune mechanism.
Purpose Little is known about the neuronal substrates of neuropsychiatric symptoms associated with COVID-19 and their evolution during the course of the disease. We aimed at describing the longitudinal brain metabolic pattern in COVID-19related encephalopathy using 18F-FDG-PET/CT. Methods Seven patients with variable clinical presentations of COVID-19-related encephalopathy were explored thrice with brain 18F-FDG-PET/CT, once in the acute phase, 1 month later and 6 months after COVID-19 onset. PET images were analysed with voxel-wise and regions-of-interest approaches in comparison with 32 healthy controls. Results Patients' neurological manifestations during acute encephalopathy were heterogeneous. However, all of them presented with predominant cognitive and behavioural frontal disorders. SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR in the CSF was negative for all patients. MRI revealed no specific abnormalities for most of the subjects. All patients had a consistent pattern of hypometabolism in a widespread cerebral network including the frontal cortex, anterior cingulate, insula and caudate nucleus. Six months after COVID-19 onset, the majority of patients clinically had improved but cognitive and emotional disorders of varying severity remained with attention/executive disabilities and anxio-depressive symptoms, and lasting prefrontal, insular and subcortical 18F-FDG-PET/CT abnormalities. Conclusion The implication of this widespread network could be the neural substrate of clinical features observed in patients with COVID-19, such as frontal lobe syndrome, emotional disturbances and deregulation of respiratory failure perception. This study suggests that this network remains mildly to severely impaired 6 months after disease onset.
Letter to the Editor This document was downloaded for personal use only. Unauthorized distribution is strictly prohibited.
In March 2020, we treated a cohort of 26 critically ill hospitalized SARS‐CoV‐2–infected patients who underwent electroencephalography to assess unexplained altered mental status, loss of consciousness, or poor arousal and responsiveness. Of the 26 patients studied, 5 patients had electroencephalograms that showed periodic discharges consisting of high‐amplitude frontal monomorphic delta waves with absence of epileptic activity. These findings may suggest central nervous system injury potentially related to COVID‐19 in these patients. ANN NEUROL 2020;88:626–630
Background Data from non-randomized studies have suggested that hydroxychloroquine could be an effective therapeutic agent against Covid-19. Methods We conducted an observational, retrospective cohort study involving hospitalized adult patients with confirmed, mild to severe Covid-19 in a French university hospital. Patients who received hydroxychloroquine (200mg tid dosage for 10 days) on a compassionate basis in addition to SOCwere compared to patients without contraindications to hydroxychloroquine who received SOCalone. A propensity score-weighted analysis was performed to control for confounders: age, sex, time between symptom onset and admission ≤ 7 days, Charlson comorbidity index, medical history of arterial hypertension, and obesity, NEWS2 score at admission, and pneumonia severity. The primary endpoint was time to unfavorable outcome, defined as: death, admission to an intensive care unit, or decision to withdraw or withhold life-sustaining treatments, whichever came first. Results Data from 89 patients with laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 were analyzed, 84 of whom were considered in the primary analysis; 38 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine and 46 patients treated with SOCalone. At admission, the mean age of patients was 66 years, the median Charlson comorbidity index was 3, and the median NEWS2 severity score was 3. After propensity score weighting, treatment with hydroxycholoroquine was not associated with a significantly reduced risk of unfavorable outcome (HR 0.90 [0.38; 2.1], p = 0.81). Overall survival was not significantly different between the two groups (HR 0.89 [0.23; 3.47], p = 1) Conclusion In hospitalized adults with Covid-19, no significant reduction of the risk of unfavorable outcomes was observed with hydroxychloroquine in comparison to standard of care. Unmeasured confounders may however have persisted despite careful propensity-weighted analysis and the study might be underpowered. Ongoing controlled trials in patients with varying degrees of initial severity on a larger scale will help determine whether there is a place for hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of Covid-19.
The authors regret that there is an error in their original article. The contributors under the CoCo-Neurosciences study group and the COVID SMIT PSL study group under the
Poster session 3, September 23, 2022, 12:30 PM - 1:30 PM Objectives Pulmonary mucormycosis (PM) is a life-threatening invasive fungal infection mostly affecting immunocompromised patients. We aimed to study the influence of underlying conditions on disease presentation and diagnostic strategy during PM. Methods All PM cases from six French teaching hospitals between 2008 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Cases were defined according to EORTC/MSG 2019 criteria with the addition of diabetes and traumatism as host factors and positive serum or tissue PCR as mycological evidence. Thoracic CT scans were reviewed centrally. Results Among 114 cases of PM, 52 (46%) were proven and 62 (54%) were probable, including 12 cases with a positive serum qPCR as the sole mycological criterion. Hematological malignancy was the most common risk factor (49%), followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (21%), and solid organ transplantation (SOT, 17%). Fever was the first symptom for 66% patients and was more frequent in patients with neutropenia than in those without (97% vs 52%, P <.01). A total of 46 (40%) patients had a disseminated infection, which was more frequently reported in neutropenic patients (50% vs 25%, P <.01). Main dissemination sites were the liver (48%), spleen (48%), brain (44%), and kidneys (37%). Sinusitis was present in 13% of cases. Chest radiological presentation included consolidation (58%), pleural effusion (52%), reversed halo sign (26%), halo sign (24%), vascular abnormalities (26%), and excavation (23%). The excavation was more frequently reported in SOT patients (64%, P <.01) compared with other groups. Vascular involvement was associated with reversed halo sign and Rhizomucor infection. Neutropenic patients presented more frequently than non-neutropenic patients with ground-glass opacities (75 vs 49%, P = .01), halo sign (32% vs 10%, P = .02), and reversed halo sign (35 vs 10%, P <.01). A total of 83 (73%) patients had a positive fungal culture from any type of respiratory sample. Serum qPCR was positive for 42/53 patients (79%) and respiratory fluid qPCR for 16/21 (76%) patients. In neutropenic patients, BAL culture was less often positive (30% vs 66%, P <.01), and serum qPCR was more frequently positive (91% vs 62%, P = .02). A transthoracic lung biopsy was contributive in 8/11 (73%) patients with negative bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Serum qPCR was more frequently positive in patients with the main lesion of >3 cm in diameter (91% vs 62%, P = .02). Rhizomucor spp. Was identified in 31 patients (32%), Rhizopus spp. In 29 patients (30%), Lichtheimia spp. In 24 patients (25%), Mucor spp. In 10 patients (10%) and Cunninghamella spp. In 4 patients (4%). Neutropenic patients were more frequently infected with Rhizomucor (43% vs 13%, P <.01) and less frequently with Rhizopus (17% vs 50%, P <.01). Histopathological specimens were available for 48 patients (42%) and revealed Mucorales hyphae in 85% of cases. Patients with a disseminated infection and neutropenia presented more often with angioinvasion than patients with localized disease (50% vs 9%, P <.01 and 38% vs 13%, P = .10). Overall, 90-day mortality was 59%. Conclusion Underlying conditions significantly influenced clinical and radiological presentation and diagnostic tools’ contribution. Neutropenic patients present more frequently with dissemination, fever, reversed halo sign, pathological angioinvasion, the negativity of BAL culture, the positivity of serum qPCR, and Rhizomucor infection.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.