Context.— Medication resins, including Kayexalate, sevelamer, and bile acid sequestrants, can be encountered in gastrointestinal tract specimens. Their classic histologic appearances have been well documented, but pathologist recognition of the resins is 75%, patient history is not always available, and atypical morphologic findings are sometimes present. Objective.— To offer a succinct overview of resins in the gastrointestinal tract, including typical and atypical appearances, in order to serve as a quick reference guide. Data Sources.— The study comprises published literature, survey data, and our personal experiences. Conclusions.— Classic morphology is the benchmark for identifying these resins, but color, location, and fish scale pattern can deviate from the norm, making proper identification a challenge. Patient history should be sought whenever possible, and ancillary staining is an option when necessary. Additionally, the presence of resins should prompt the pathologist to search for potentially related diagnoses (namely, causes of diarrhea in patients on bile acid sequestrants and diagnoses associated with renal failure in patients on Kayexalate or sevelamer).
BackgroundDifferentiating parathyroid from thyroid lesions can be difficult on fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) due to overlapping cytomorphologic features. While the traditional parathyroid hormone (PTH) assays can help in the distinction, these tests may be cumbersome, particularly when the lesion is unexpected clinically and a needle wash is not collected at the time of FNA. Therefore, we chose to investigate the application of immunohistochemical staining (IHC) with GATA 3 and thyroid transcription factor‐1 (TTF‐1) on air‐dried cytology smears to distinguish parathyroid and thyroid lesions.MethodsAir‐dried touch preparation (TP) slides were prepared from consecutively selected parathyroid and thyroid specimens. Thirteen FNA cases with the clinical concern for parathyroid lesions were also included in the study. IHC was performed on unstained and ultrafast Papanicolaou (UFP) stained air‐dried slides.ResultsOn TP slides, GATA 3 expression was observed in all cases of parathyroid origin but no immunoreactivity was present in thyroid lesions. TTF‐1 expression was observed in all cases of thyroid origin but not in parathyroid lesions. GATA 3 and TTF‐1 expression of 13 FNA cases were consistent with the clinical impression or concurrent PTH tests.ConclusionsIHC with GATA 3 and TTF‐1 on air‐dried cytology smears is a simple and effective way to differentiate parathyroid vs thyroid lesions on FNA. Air‐dried unstained and UFP‐stained slides perform equally well with IHC, but UFP‐stained slides provide the added benefit of morphologic evaluation and assessment of smear cellularity prior to IHC.
Objective: Squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) are classified as low-grade SIL (LGSIL) and high-grade SIL (HGSIL). ‘LGSIL cannot exclude high grade’ (LGSIL-H) interpretive category has been used in cases where findings exceed criteria for LGSIL, but do not fulfill the criteria for HGSIL. This study analyzed follow-up histology of LGSIL-H cases and compared the follow-up results of LGSIL-H with LGSIL to determine the utility of LGSIL-H category using a single institution’s experience. Study Design: Pap smears with LGSIL-H interpretation from 2005 to 2008 were retrieved. Histological follow-up results for LGSIL-H cases were analyzed and compared to the follow-up results of LGSIL cases. Results: Cases with LGSIL-H interpretation (311) comprised 0.18% of all cases (170,307). Follow-up was available for 144 patients and 13.2% had benign findings, 51.4% had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1, and 35.4% had CIN 2 or higher. In comparison, of 425 patients with LGSIL, 22.6% had benign findings, 71% had CIN 1 and 6.4% had CIN 2 or higher. Conclusion: A significantly greater number of patients with LGSIL-H interpretation had a CIN 2 or higher lesion on follow-up compared to patients with LGSIL. This suggests LGSIL-H may be a useful diagnostic category.
Objectives Our study assesses whether the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) offers any benefit over the original cytology classification, and measures interobserver agreement. Methods Four cytopathologists retrospectively blindly classified preoperative cytology by MSRSGC from 101 resected salivary tumors. Consensus MSRSGC diagnoses were correlated with surgical pathology diagnoses and compared with the original cytology classification. Diagnostic parameters were calculated for both systems. Interobserver variability was assessed. Results The original cytology classification vs MSRSGC had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 75.0% vs 78.3%, 97.1% vs 98.0%, 91.2% vs 94.7%, and 90.1% vs 90.0%, respectively. The original cytology classification risk of neoplasm (RON) was 91.7% for “negative for malignancy” and 100.0% for other categories. The MSRSGC RON was 71.4% in category II (nonneoplastic) and 100.0% in all other categories. The original cytology classification risk of malignancy (ROM) ranged from 0.0% for “atypical” to 100.0% for “positive for malignancy.” The MSRSGC ROM ranged from 0.0% in categories I (nondiagnostic) and III (nonneoplastic) to 100.0% in category VI (malignant). Weighted agreement using the MSRSGC was 92% (Gwet AC1, 0.84); unweighted agreement was 69% (Gwet AC1, 0.64). MSRSGC category IVA (benign neoplasm) was most likely to show interobserver agreement, with complete agreement in 67% of cases. Conclusions The MSRSGC performs similarly to the original cytology classification and shows relatively high interobserver agreement.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.