Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a general term that describes the short-or long-term support of the heart and/or lungs in neonates, children and adults. Due to favorable results and a steady decline in absolute contraindications, its use is increasing worldwide. Indications in children differ from those in adults. The ECMO circuit as well as cannulation strategies also are individualized, considering their implications in children. The aim of this article is to review the clinical indications, different circuits, and cannulation strategies for ECMO. We also present our institutional experience with 92 pediatric ECMO patients (34 neonates, 58 pediatric) with the majority (80%) of veno-arterial placements between 2014 until 2018. We further to also highlight ECMO use in the setting of cardiac arrest [extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or eCPR].
Objective. The aim of this study was to compare feasibility, effectiveness, safety, and outcome of atrial septal defect (ASD) device closure in children with and without fluoroscopy guidance. Methods and Results. Children undergoing transcatheter ASD closure between 2002 and 2016 were included into this single center, retrospective study. Patients were analysed in two groups [1: intraprocedural fluoroscopy ± transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) guidance; 2: TOE guidance alone]. Three-hundred-ninety-seven children were included, 238 (97 male) in group 1 and 159 (56 male) in group 2. Two-hundred-twenty-nine of 238 (96%) patients underwent successful fluoroscopy guided ASD closures versus 154/159 (97%) successful procedures with TOE guidance alone. Median weight (IQR) at intervention was 20kg (16.0-35.0) in group 1 versus 19.3kg (16.0-31.2) in group 2. Mean (SD) preinterventional ASD diameter was 12.4mm (4.4) in group 1 versus 12.2mm (3.9) in group 2. There was no significant difference in number of defects or characteristics of ASD rims. Median procedure time was shorter in group 2 [60min (47-86) versus 34min (28-44)]. Device-size-to-defect-ratio was similar in both groups [group 1: 1.07 versus group 2: 1.09]. There were less technical intraprocedural events in group 2 [10 (6.3%) versus 47 (20%)]. Intraprocedural complications were less frequent in group 2 [1 (0.6%) versus 8 (3.3%)]. Conclusion. Transcatheter ASD device closure with TOE guidance alone (i.e., without fluoroscopy) is as effective and safe as ASD closure with fluoroscopy guidance. As fluoroscopy remains an important adjunct to transoesophageal echocardiography, especially in complex defects and complications, procedures are always performed in a fully equipped cardiac catheterization laboratory.
We evaluated the characteristics of children for whom critical incidents (CIs) were reported by performing prospective collection of patient data and retrospective review of reported CIs in a multidisciplinary neonatal-paediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary care university children's hospital. A period of 1 year was analysed (January to December 2007; 1,251 admissions). CIs comprised adverse events (actual patient injury), as well as near-misses. The report form of critical incidents was web-based and reporting was voluntary, anonymous and non-punitive. The severity of all CIs was divided into minor, moderate and major. Patients with and without CIs were compared regarding the following characteristics: Paediatric Index of Mortality (PIM2), duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in the intensive care, admission mode (surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass, cardiac/non-cardiac unit), age and sex. There were 360 CI reports (83 per 1,000 patient days; 13% major, 26% moderate, 61% minor severity). Of these, 310 CIs could be assigned to 198 specific patients. In the univariate analysis, patient-related risk factors for CIs were higher PIM2 score (p < 0.0001), increased length of stay (p < 0.0001), mechanical ventilation (p < 0.0001), increased ventilator days (p < 0.0001), male gender (p = 0.022) and young age (p < 0.0001). Using a logistic regression model, mechanical ventilation (p < 0.0001), male gender (p = 0.034) and length of stay (p < 0.0001) continued to be associated with the occurrence of CIs. Conclusion CIs often occur in paediatric intensive care. Among the patient-related factors, male gender, mechanical ventilation, and length of stay are independently associated with CIs. Already known at admission to intensive care are male gender and, usually, requirement for mechanical ventilation. Improved knowledge of the risk factors for CIs could help to minimize their frequency and thus improve quality of care.
Background: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is a common complication in preterm infants. Clinical prediction of BPD at an early stage in life is difficult. Plasma proendothelin-1 (CT-proET-1) is a lung injury biomarker in pulmonary hypertension and respiratory distress. Objective: To assess the prognostic ability of CT-proET-1 in BPD. Methods: In 227 prospectively enrolled preterm infants born at <32 weeks gestational age (GA), plasma CT-proET-1 was measured at birth, day of life (DOL) 2, 3, 6 and 28, and at 36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA). BPD was defined as mild in infants requiring supplemental oxygen at DOL 28 and moderate/severe in those requiring it at 36 weeks PMA. Results: The predictive ability of CT-proET-1 for any BPD was poor at birth [area under the ROC curve (AUC) 0.654, 95% CI 0.494-0.814], moderate at DOL 2 and 3 (AUC 0.769, 95% CI 0.666-0.872) and excellent at DOL 6 (AUC 0.918, 95% CI 0.840-0.995). Multivariable regression analysis revealed that CT-proET-1 levels at DOL 2, 3, 6 and 28 were strongly related to the duration of oxygen supplementation, independently of GA and the duration of respiratory support. Conclusions: CT-proET-1 is a novel promising biomarker for predicting the development of BPD in preterm infants when measured at the end of the first week of life.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.