Capillary electrophoresis (CE) offers fast and high‐resolution separation of charged analytes from small injection volumes. Coupled to mass spectrometry (MS), it represents a powerful analytical technique providing (exact) mass information and enables molecular characterization based on fragmentation. Although hyphenation of CE and MS is not straightforward, much emphasis has been placed on enabling efficient ionization and user‐friendly coupling. Though several interfaces are now commercially available, research on more efficient and robust interfacing with nano‐electrospray ionization (ESI), matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP) continues with considerable results. At the same time, CE‐MS has been used in many fields, predominantly for the analysis of proteins, peptides and metabolites. This review belongs to a series of regularly published articles, summarizing 248 articles covering the time between June 2016 and May 2018. Latest developments on hyphenation of CE with MS as well as instrumental developments such as two‐dimensional separation systems with MS detection are mentioned. Furthermore, applications of various CE‐modes including capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE), nonaqueous capillary electrophoresis (NACE), capillary gel electrophoresis (CGE) and capillary isoelectric focusing (CIEF) coupled to MS in biological, pharmaceutical and environmental research are summarized.

Coupling of capillary electrophoresis to electrospray mass spectrometry still remains challenging and a topic of research to find the best interface regarding sensitivity, robustness, and ease of use. Here, a nanoflow sheath liquid interface for CE-ESI-MS is presented and compared to both a standard triple-tube sheath liquid and a porous-tip sheathless interface for three groups of analytes. The nanoflow sheath liquid interface with a separation capillary inserted into a glass emitter was initially characterized to facilitate optimization and method development. Implementation of a shut-off valve, syringe pump, and inline filter enabled easy handling and fast analyses, repeatable both in positive and negative modes (intra-day RSD of 6.6 to 12.0%). The same setup was used for sheathless interfacing by exchanging the emitter and using a porous etched tip separation capillary. Both nanoflow interfaces showed similar performance. Average peak areas using the nanoflow sheath liquid interface were a factor of 38 for 6 organic acids in negative mode, 114 and 36 for the light and heavy chain of a monoclonal antibody, and 13 higher for peptides in positive mode compared to the triple-tube interface. This first direct comparison of the three most common interfaces exhibits a strong improvement in sensitivity to the same extent for both nanoflow interfaces, where sheath liquid interfaces offer full flexibility in method development.

Reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC) used for water analysis is not ideal for the analysis of highly polar and ionic contaminants because of low retention. Capillary electrophoresis (CE), on the other hand, is perfectly suited for the separation of ionic compounds but rarely applied in environmental analysis due to the weak concentration sensitivity when coupled to mass spectrometry (MS). However, novel interface designs and MS technology strongly improve the sensitivity. Here, a method is presented enabling the screening of anionic micropollutants in drinking water without sample pretreatment by coupling of CE to an Orbitrap mass spectrometer by a nanoflow sheath liquid interface. Targeted analysis of halogenated acetic acids, trifluoromethanesulfonic acid, and perfluorooctanoic and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid was conducted in drinking water samples which were chlorinated for disinfection. A bare fused silica capillary with an optimized background electrolyte (BGE) for separation consisting of 10% acetic acid with 10% isopropanol with large volume sample injection and optimized interface parameters offer limits of quantification in the range of < 0.1 to 0.5 μg/L with good linearity (R 2 > 0.993) and repeatability (14% standard deviation in area). Concentrations of the target analytes ranged from 0.1 to 6.2 μg/L in the water samples. Masses corresponding to halogenated methanesulfonic acids have been found as suspects and were subsequently verified by standards. Mono-, dichloro-, and bromochloro methanesulfonic acid were quantified in a range of 0.2 to 3.6 μg/L. Furthermore, five sulfonic acids, four organosulfates, and the artificial sweeteners acesulfame and cyclamate as well as inorganics such as halides, halogenates, phosphate, and sulfate could be determined as suspects among more than 300 features in a non-targeted screening. Overall, this approach demonstrates the great potential of CE-nanoESI-MS for the screening of ionic contaminants in environmental samples, complementary to chromatographic approaches.