Medical procedures in outpatient settings have limited options of managing pain and anxiety pharmacologically. We therefore assessed whether this can be achieved by adjunct self-hypnotic relaxation in a common and particularly anxiety provoking procedure. Two hundred and thirty-six women referred for large core needle breast biopsy to an urban tertiary university-affiliated medical center were prospectively randomized to receive standard care (n=76), structured empathic attention (n=82), or self-hypnotic relaxation (n=78) during their procedures. Patients' self-ratings at 1 min-intervals of pain and anxiety on 0-10 verbal analog scales with 0=no pain/anxiety at all, 10=worst pain/anxiety possible, were compared in an ordinal logistic regression model. Women's anxiety increased significantly in the standard group (logit slope=0.18, p<0.001), did not change in the empathy group (slope=-0.04, p=0.45), and decreased significantly in the hypnosis group (slope=-0.27, p<0.001). Pain increased significantly in all three groups (logit slopes: standard care=0.53, empathy=0.37, hypnosis=0.34; all p<0.001) though less steeply with hypnosis and empathy than standard care (p=0.024 and p=0.018, respectively). Room time and cost were not significantly different in an univariate ANOVA despite hypnosis and empathy requiring an additional professional: 46 min/161 dollars for standard care, 43 min/163 dollars for empathy, and 39 min/152 dollars for hypnosis. We conclude that, while both structured empathy and hypnosis decrease procedural pain and anxiety, hypnosis provides more powerful anxiety relief without undue cost and thus appears attractive for outpatient pain management.

Patients are often prepared for procedural discomforts with descriptions of pain or undesirable experiences. This practice is thought to be compassionate and helpful, but there is little data on the effect of such communicative behavior. This study assesses how such descriptions affect patients' pain and anxiety during medical procedures. The interactions of patients with their healthcare providers during interventional radiological procedures were videotaped during a previously reported 3-arm prospective randomized trial assessing the efficacy of self-hypnotic relaxation. One hundred and fifty-nine videos of the standard care and attention control arms were reviewed. All statements that described painful or undesirable experiences as warning before potentially noxious stimuli or as expression of sympathy afterwards were recorded. Patients' ratings of pain and anxiety on 0-10 numerical scales (0=No Pain, No Anxiety at All and 10=Worst Pain Possible, Terrified) after the painful event and/or sympathizing statement were the basis for this study. Warning the patient in terms of pain or undesirable experiences resulted in greater pain (P<0.05) and greater anxiety (P<0.001) than not doing so. Sympathizing with the patient in such terms after a painful event did not increase reported pain, but resulted in greater anxiety (P<0.05). Contrary to common belief, warning or sympathizing using language that refers to negative experiences may not make patients feel better. This conclusion has implications for the training in medical communication skills and suggests the need for randomized trials testing different patient-practioner interactions.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

IntroductionThe automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) is the fi rst of its kind and utilises a large, 17 cm × 15 cm high-frequency ultrasound probe which sweeps across the whole breast generating images that can be reformatted into multiple planes and a 3D volume. ABVS will change breast ultrasound practice by: introducing operator standardisation, reproducibility and repeatability of measurement and interpretation; changing who acquires the volume set and how breast ultrasounds are reported; and allowing accurate comparison of previous and current examinations for screening and assessing treatment change. Methods Patients presented to the symptomatic clinic for conventional 2D ultrasound assessment with a variety of conditions. An additional ABVS was performed. Results Cases were classifi ed into: benign -for example, cysts, fi broadenomas, diabetic mastopathy; and malignant. Conclusion We present a review of our initial experience and highlight its advantages over conventional ultrasound, which include: improved mapping of lesions enabling more accurate future assessment and follow-up, and improved assessment of distortion over conventional 2D ultrasound. Further research is required to explore other potential benefi ts. O2 Symptomatic breast services in Ireland: how do they compare with national and international standards? D O'Leary, L RainfordIntroduction A study of symptomatic breast units geographically spread over Ireland collected image quality, compression and radiation dose data from 18 mammography units; so how do these optimisation parameters compare nationally and internationally? The mean glandular dose (MGD) diagnostic reference level was proposed for the all-digital breast screening service [1] but not for the symptomatic breast service. Methods The quantitative and qualitative data were analysed using SPSS. Recommendations of MGD diagnostic reference levels were made at various levels for fi lm-screen mammography (FSM) and full-fi eld digital mammography (FFDM) units to match those levels published in worldwide. ResultsMGDs received by symptomatic breast patients within Ireland are higher than those received in the all-digital Irish Breast Screening service, although the diff erences for FFDM are not substantial; 55 to 65 mm breast: 1.75 mGy (screening) versus 2.4 mGy (symptomatic) at the 95th percentile. The four-view routine mammography MGDs obtained in symptomatic breast units in Ireland are, however, substantially diff erent from other screening units with mixed FSM/FFDM modalities: 4.5 mGy (UK); 4.98 mGy (USA) versus 5.96 mGy (FFDM, symptomatic) and 9.63 mGy (FSM, symptomatic). Various reasons are proposed for the diff erences. Conclusion MGD diagnostic reference levels achieved in the screening service may be lower due to the exacting requirements for radiographer training, nonsurgical alteration of patient breasts and equipment quality assurance levels. Greater training of radiographers performing mammography in the symptomatic breast services is required to standardise mammographic proj...

No abstract