It is established that the competitiveness that is conditional on sets of institutions, policies and factors determining the country’s productivity transforms under the influence of challenges of sustainable development, which is reflected in international economic security strategies. The article’s objective is to investigate the compliance of the ideological foundations of the Sustained Development Goals with the assignment of productivity growth in countries. The research problem is to substantiate a stable causality between the Sustainable Development Goals and the economic security of countries and firms in the process of gaining new comparative advantages.The following research methods were used to achieve the objective and solve the problem covers a set of specific methods of empirical research, analysis and synthesis, abstraction, idealization, generalization and induction.The scientific novelty of the results is that the transformation potential of the sustainable development ideology and the resulting Sustainable Development Goals were investigated in the productivity context at macrolevel (country level) and mesolevel (firm level), which enabled: to establish the non-static nature of a comparative advantage under the influence of dialectic opposition of growth-based and development-based concepts in the economic security strategies of countries; to identify the increasing productive capacity as the fundamental interest of a country, going beyond the purely economic boundaries and overlapping with social, environmental and resource endowment dimensions; to classify the comprehensive development of a human, development of education and science, development of advanced machinery and technologies, science and technology progress, organizational and managerial improvements in the production as factors for development of productive forces.
The paper analyzes the role of the Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics in the development of the Ukrainian statistical system and its adaptation to international standards. The adoption and implementation of the Fundamental Principles, their subsequent development in the European Statistics Code of Practice (2005) and explanation in the National Principles Governing the Activity of the State Statistics Bodies of Ukraine (2010) served as a clear benchmark for setting priorities in the state statistical activity. It should be noted that not all of the principles could be equally easy implemented in the existing statistical practice. Even today two decades after the adoption of the Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics, there is still a number of debating points in their practical implementation. Special attention is given to the compilation of the National Principles Governing the Activity of the State Statistics Bodies of Ukraine that are based on the European Statistics Code of Practice and incorporate PARIS21 system of indicators. The principles have been developed and implemented with the goal to create the basis for further strengthening of the institutional capacity of national statistical office, to implement the best practices of the European statistics, and on this basis to enhance user confidence in the official statistics and ensure high-quality statistical information.
Read the full book on: 10.1787/how_life-2017-en How's life in 2017? What makes for a good life? While the richness of human experience cannot be captured in numbers alone, it is important that the statistics shaping public policy reflect both people's material living conditions, and the quality of their lives. This includes how life is changing over time, how lives differ across different population groups, and whether today's well-being is achieved at the cost of depleting resources for the future. This fourth edition of How's Life? aims to meet this need, providing a picture of people's well-being in OECD and partner countries. © OECD Reproduction of this summary is allowed provided the OECD copyright and the title of the original publication are mentioned. Multilingual summaries are translated excerpts of OECD publications originally published in English and in French. Read the complete English version on OECD iLibrary!
Intensification of destabilizing processes in the world economy, increasing the impact of global challenges and the spread of uncertainty in the conditions of economic activity actualize scientific research to ensure a high level of economic security of countries and regions. This in turn requires a thorough systematic analysis and assessment of the level of security and the state of the security environment based on the development of appropriate methodological tools. Taking it into account, the presented research is aimed at developing a system for monitoring and assessing the level of security development of the countries of the European region, based on the tools of multidimensional assessment and construction of complex integrated indicators. The article is aimed to development of the system for monitoring and assessing the EU security level, which consists of comprehensive assessment of the formation of security development factors, construction of the security level integrated indexes, which allowes to classify the EU countries according to the security level, to identify the features and intensity of the influence of the different determinants on the security level formation, to establish the peculiarities of the EU countries distribution within the regional security space. The object of the study is the regional security complex of the EU, based on the monitoring system – 24 indicators, which are systematized by nature (economic, sociodemographic, environmental) and direction of impact (incentives, disincentives), which are assessed for the period 2010–2019. The results show a high assessment of the integrated level of security in countries such as Ireland, Sweden, Denmark, Austria, Cyprus, Finland, Slovakia, the Netherlands, Luxembourg and Germany; Ireland, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Lithuania, and Denmark have the highest security positions in terms of the economic component of the security level, Cyprus, Slovenia, Ireland, Luxembourg and Slovenia in terms of socio-demographic, and Sweden, Austria, Denmark, Finland and Portugal in terms of environmental security. The reduced impact of the economic security component factors, maintaining a moderate impact of the socio-demographic security component factors, the increasing influence of the environmental factors are determined. Statistical analysis of the distribution of the EU countries by security level in 2010–2019 confirmed the tendency to equalize the level of security development of the EU countries within the regional security complex, to reduce the level of variation of integrated assessments of security levels, to increase the share of countries with high levels. Building a matrix of positioning of the EU countries by the integrated level of security and the intensity of its dynamics allowed to divide the countries and zones of relative security and danger, and to determine that the most risky positions are in Italy, Bulgaria and Romania. The practical significance of the results of the study lies in the possibility of applying the proposed system of monitoring the level of security in the development and implementation of regional security strategy of the EU development, which will more effectively monitor changes, prevent risks and threats, prevent negative consequences.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.