Purpose. To represent the approach to estimating the cost of commercial transfer of integral intangible system (technology) as opposed to the set of assessments of separate intellectual property right objects. Methodology. To determine the estimation of the cost of integral intangible system (technology), we use the model approach involving formulas by the algorithm of investments in the development of innovative technology taking into account the cost and result reduction to the time factor, carried out and received before and after the target year (period) using the discount rate. Findings. The presented model approach to estimating the cost of commercial transfer of innovative technology is regarded not as separate intellectual property right objects, but as full cost estimating where the object of estimated cost is property right to integral intangible system (technology), which essentially simplifies the calculations of cost estimating the intellectual property rights of technology transfer and creates opportunities for the implementation of innovative technical and technological project of new generation production, associated with an integral intangible system (technology) aimed at making a profit (income). Originality. A new approach proposed to estimating the cost of the innovative technology commercial transfer that is an integral intangible system as a set of scientific and engineering knowledge turned into work methods and equipment, sets of production material factors, types of their combination to create a particular product or service. It leads to obtaining synergetic effect on the results of innovative product sales represented as profit (income). The important condition of the estimated cost of technology object property right is its quantitative value for the consumer, when the quantitative appraisal becomes identical (equivalent) to the value of material embodiment of technology object or a carrier presented in an objective form i.e. available for perception by others. Practical value. The proposed model approach to estimating the cost of the property rights to integral intangible system (technology) simplifies the calculation of the value of the developed or implemented innovative technology (-ies) aimed at creating and implementing new generation production in the real economics sector that will increase efficiency and lead to pumping up the countrys budget.
The banking system is an integral component and destructive force of the state economy. The implementation of new ways and principles of conducting banking business is quite dynamic under the conditions of modern globalization processes. The reform of the banking system is directly accompanied by the establishment of appropriate regulations at the legislative level, which are adapted to internationally recognized legal norms and international experience in banking. Banking should be carried out exclusively on a legal basis, and the shortcomings of the legislation directly affect the operations and condition of banks. That is why this study is based on two areas of specialties and covers the fundamentals of law and the banking system. This article is devoted to the study of the main directions of banking system development carried out by reforming the banking legislation. A number of normative legal acts of national legislation, main international agreements of Ukraine in the field of banking system reform are analyzed. We also studied the reports and action plans of the National Bank of Ukraine and the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine which propose the implementation of the Basic Principles of Effective Banking Supervision and provide the implementation of the Association Agreement between Ukraine on the one hand, and the European Union, the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States on the other hand in banking. Certain legislative changes are proposed to help achieve the principles set out in the EU acquis and Basel III. On the basis of official reporting indicators an analysis of the efficiency of banks was carried out depending on the form of ownership -with public, private and foreign capital in order to establish the shortcomings of the modern domestic banking system.
The article considers novel legal regulations regarding non-original objects generated by a computer program. It was established that at the level of the law, legal certainty was introduced regarding the legal regime of these objects: the concept and characteristics of a non-original object, generated by a computer program, subjects of property rights, the scope of such rights, their validity period, the possibility of transfer (alienation) were defined) of these rights, as well as an opportunity to properly protect such rights. The signs of a non-original object generated by a computer program are defined: difference from already existing similar objects; creation of an object solely as a result of the operation of a computer program without direct human participation. It has been proven that the independent legal personality of artificial intelligence is highly debatable, and this concept goes far beyond the boundaries of intellectual property law. It is justified that giving artificial intelligence an independent legal personality as of today is a hasty step, therefore the approach reflected in the law deserves attention.It is substantiated that the legal regime of an object that is non-original and that is generated by a computer program is very similar to the legal regime of a work as an object of copyright, which enables the relevant subjects to exercise and protect the rights to these objects. It was established that as a result of the creation of a non-original object generated by a computer program, personal non-property rights do not arise at all, and property rights belong to the owner of the property rights to the computer program that generated such an object. It has been proven that the property rights to a nonoriginal object are in fact identical to the property rights of the author (other subjects of property copyright), the scope of which is determined by Article 12 of the Copyright Law.It is established that when creating a non-original object generated by a computer program, one should observe the property rights to other non-original objects generated by a computer program, which are used in the process of generating a new non-original object; to objects of copyright and/or related rights that were used in the process of generating such non-original object.
Keywords: innovations, innovation management, intellectual property, managementsystems, management system standards The UN General Assembly Resolution dated September 25,2015 set goals for sustainable development, which are actively accepted around theworld. The World Intellectual Property Organization, the International Organizationfor Standardization, and the Public authorities of various countries are looking forand implementing approaches to achieve these goals. They are supported by the Decree of the President of Ukraine «On the Sustainable Development Goals of Ukraineuntil 2030», which became the strategy of economic development of our country.Innovations are inherent in any sphere of human activity and can be applied forachieving goals of sustainable development, but it is not always possible to organize acreative process resulting in their occurence and implementation. In addition, the creatoror employer of the creator often does not support innovation properly at differentstages of its life cycle and loses the opportunity to benefit, in particular: do not adhereto secure communication, are unable to assess the importance and commercial viabilityof innovation, fail to protect and commercialize it.Research on the problems with regress in achieving the goals of sustainable developmentrelated to innovations, innovation management, taking into account the requirementsof legislation and management system standards.International and national legislation in the field of intellectual property, managementsystem standards. When researching methods of analysis and synthesis wereused including system analysis.The results are based on the analysis of publications, current legislation and existingstandards on various management systems.Statements concerning innovation activities that are within the competence ofboth specialists in the economic and legal spheres, as well as specialists in the technicalsphere were developed. Statements for the development of a clear and accessibleprocedure for all employees, for innovation management taking into account theprocess of novation development and implementation were developed.
Keywords: intellectual property, industrial property, codification of legislation, innovation, inventor, amount of fee, law, patent, EU law The article examines the state and trends of legal regulation in the field of intellectual property (IP), forms of systematization of legislation in the field of IP in international treaties, EU regulations, and national legislation. The models of legal regulation of IP are highlighted, the classification of their objects is given. The structure and content of the main provisions of the new draft law Industrial Property Law are analysed (on the example of Poland). The bill comprehensively regulates all objects of industrialproperty. The changes are mainly aimed at streamlining, speeding up and reducing the costs of obtaining protection of industrial property objects, especially inventions, utility models, industrial designs, trademarks and geographical indications. System changes are shown: the institution of preliminary notice of invention, the registration system for the protection of utility models, a deposit containing technical and technological information that constitutes a commercial secret, conciliation procedures for disputes, IP COMBO — discounts when calculating the amount of state duty in the case of simultaneous presentation of three different objects of industrial property. As a result of the changes made, the attractiveness of the national system of industrial property protection will increase, and the established fees will be an incentive for applicantsto obtain legal protection for as many innovative solutions as possible. Possible ways of systematizing legislation in the field of industrial property in Ukraine are proposed. It is concluded that one of the most effective ways to solve the problem ofcodification is the development and adoption of the Industrial Property Code (following the example of Poland), which would combine and consolidate the main norms regarding the legal protection of industrial property rights.
Keywords: registered industrial designs, novelty, individual character, administrativeprocedure, invalidity The new edition of the Law of Ukraine «On the Protection of Rights to Industrial Designs» No. 3770-XII,adopted on October 14, 2020, introduced significant changes to the regulation of thelegal protection of industrial designs. The basic norms of the law were harmonizedwith the articles 212−217 Chapter 9 «Intellectual Property» of the Association Agreementbetween Ukraine, on the one hand, and the European Union, the EuropeanAtomic Energy Community and their Member States, on the other hand. The conceptsof «individual character», «the overall impression», «the informed user» and «thedegree of freedom of the designer», «the circles specializing in the relevant industry»have been introduced into the sphere of legal protection. These concepts were not previouslyused in the legislation of Ukraine. The article analyzes the content of theseconcepts on the basis of European law enforcement practice, Decision of the EuropeanUnion Intellectual Property Office Board of Appeal, Judgment of the Court of Justiceof the European Union и Judgment of the General Court of the European Union. Inaccordance with the new edition of the Law, an industrial design can be declared invalidin an administrative procedure. Authors reviewed the administrative procedure for establishing the conformity of a registered industrial design to the criteria for protection(a novelty and an individual character). A registered industrial design shall beconsidered to be new, if no identical design has been previously disclosed to the publicand to have an individual character if the overall impression it produces on the informeduser differs from the overall impression produced on such a user by any previouslydisclosed design. A design shall be deemed to have been made available to thepublic (i) if it has been published following registration or otherwise, or exhibited,used in trade or otherwise disclosed, (ii) except where these events could not reasonablyhave become known in the normal course of business to the circles specializing inthe relevant industry in Ukraine. Authors analyzed this two-step test. Particular attentionwas paid to the disclosure of industrial designs as a trade mark, copyrightwork, patent, utility model or otherwise on the Internet. Criteria for assessing disclosureof designs on the internet considered.
Вступ. Інститут інспекторів з питань інтелектуальної власності (ІР) було створено відповідно до Указу Президента України в 2001 році. Він є важливими механізмом контролю держави за забезпеченням дотримання ІР-прав суб’єктів господарювання.Проблематика. Основними проблемами, пов’язаними із формуванням цього інституту, є: неврегульованість правового статусу інституту державних ІР-інспекторів і ІР-інспекції як інституції національної IP-системи; протиріччястатусу внутрішніх структурних підрозділів Мінекономіки та його IP-департаменту; необхідність визначення основних сфер вдосконалення інституційно-правового забезпечення контрольно-наглядової IP-діяльності.Мета. Дослідження інституційно-правових аспектів сучасних проблем та стратегічних перспектив державної інспекції з питань інтелектуальної власності.Матеріали й методи. Використано загальнонаукові та спеціально юридичні методи дослідження правових явищ такатегорій. Дослідження джерел IP-права, а також законодавства про контрольно-наглядову діяльність та про державну службу проведено з використанням методу системного аналізу та формально юридичного методу.Результати. Проведено аналіз нормативно-правової бази, що забезпечує регулювання контрольно-наглядових відносин в IP-сфері. Виявлено проблемні питання у правосуб’єктності державних IP-інспекторів.Висновки. Запропоновано шляхи вдосконалення інституційно-правового забезпечення контрольно-наглядовоїдіяльності в IP-сфері: розгляд питання не про інститут державних IP-інспекторів, а про державну IP-інспекцію як інституцію національної IP-системи; передавання контрольно-наглядових IP-повноважень та штату IP-інспекторів Держпродспоживслужбі; врегулювання питання про контрольно-наглядову IP-діяльність Мінекономіки і про державних IP-інспекторів; визначено основні сфери вдосконалення інституційно-правового забезпечення контрольнонаглядової IP-діяльності.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.