Lung transplantation has become an established therapeutic option for a variety of end-stage lung diseases. Technical advances in graft procurement, implantation, perioperative care, immunosuppression, and posttransplant medical management have led to significant improvements in 1-year survival, but outcomes after the first year have improved minimally over the last two decades. The main limitation to better long-term survival after lung transplantation is chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). CLAD also impairs quality of life and increases the costs of medical care. Our understanding of CLAD manifestations, risk factors, and mechanisms is rapidly evolving. Recognition of different CLAD phenotypes (e.g., bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and restrictive allograft syndrome) and the unique pathogenic mechanisms will be important for developing novel therapies. In addition to alloimmune-mediated rejection, we now recognize the importance of alloimmune-independent mechanisms of injury to the allograft. CLAD is the consequence of dysregulated repair of allograft injury. Unfortunately, currently available therapies for CLAD are usually not effective. However, the advances in knowledge, reviewed in this manuscript, should lead to novel strategies for CLAD prevention and treatment, as well as improvement in long-term outcomes after lung transplantation. We provide an overview of the evolving terminology related to CLAD, its varying clinical phenotypes and their diagnosis, natural history, pathogenesis, and potential treatments.
Original Clinical Science-General Background. Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) phenotype determines prognosis and may have therapeutic implications. Despite the clarity achieved by recent consensus statement definitions, their reliance on radiologic interpretation introduces subjectivity. The Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) has established protocols for chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT)-based computer-aided quantification of both interstitial disease and air-trapping. We applied quantitative image analysis (QIA) at CLAD onset to demonstrate radiographic phenotypes with clinical implications. Methods. We studied 47 first bilateral lung transplant recipients at UCLA with chest HRCT performed within 90 d of CLAD onset and 47 no-CLAD control HRCTs. QIA determined the proportion of lung volume affected by interstitial disease and air-trapping in total lung capacity and residual volume images, respectively. We compared QIA scores between no-CLAD and CLAD, and between phenotypes. We also assigned radiographic phenotypes based solely on QIA, and compared their survival outcomes. Results. CLAD onset HRCTs had more lung affected by the interstitial disease (P = 0.003) than no-CLAD controls. Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) cases had lower scores for interstitial disease as compared with probable restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS) (P < 0.0001) and mixed CLAD (P = 0.02) phenotypes. BOS cases had more air-trapping than probable RAS (P < 0.0001). Among phenotypes assigned by QIA, the relative risk of death was greatest for mixed (relative risk [RR] 11.81), followed by RAS (RR 6.27) and BOS (RR 3.15). Conclusions. Chest HRCT QIA at CLAD onset appears promising as a method for precise determination of CLAD phenotypes with survival implications.
The primary factor that limits long-term survival after lung transplantation is chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). CLAD also impairs quality of life and increases the costs of medical care. Our understanding of CLAD continues to evolve. Consensus definitions of CLAD and the major CLAD phenotypes were recently updated and clarified, but it remains to be seen whether the current definitions will lead to advances in management or impact care. Understanding the potential differences in pathogenesis for each CLAD phenotype may lead to novel therapeutic strategies, including precision medicine. Recognition of CLAD risk factors may lead to earlier interventions to mitigate risk, or to avoid risk factors all together, to prevent the development of CLAD. Unfortunately, currently available therapies for CLAD are usually not effective. However, novel therapeutics aimed at both prevention and treatment are currently under investigation. We provide an overview of the updates to CLAD-related terminology, clinical phenotypes and their diagnosis, natural history, pathogenesis, and potential strategies to treat and prevent CLAD.
Despite the common detection of non‐donor specific anti‐HLA antibodies (non‐DSAs) after lung transplantation, their clinical significance remains unclear. In this retrospective single‐center cohort study of 325 lung transplant recipients, we evaluated the association between donor‐specific HLA antibodies (DSAs) and non‐DSAs with subsequent CLAD development. DSAs were detected in 30% of recipients and were associated with increased CLAD risk, with higher HRs for both de novo and high MFI (>5000) DSAs. Non‐DSAs were detected in 56% of recipients, and 85% of DSA positive tests had concurrent non‐DSAs. In general, non‐DSAs did not increase CLAD risk in multivariable models accounting for DSAs. However, non‐DSAs in conjunction with high BAL CXCL9 levels were associated with increased CLAD risk. Multivariable proportional hazards models demonstrate the importance of the HLA antibody‐CXCL9 interaction: CLAD risk increases when HLA antibodies (both DSAs and non‐DSAs) are detected in conjunction with high CXCL9. Conversely, CLAD risk is not increased when HLA antibodies are detected with low CXCL9. This study supports the potential utility of BAL CXCL9 measurement as a biomarker to risk stratify HLA antibodies for future CLAD. The ability to discriminate between high versus low‐risk HLA antibodies may improve management by allowing for guided treatment decisions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.