Forty hairless mice were given injections of tritiated thymidine every 4th hour during 10 days. At 24 hr intervals groups of four mice were killed. The numbers of labelled basal and differentiating cells were determined by autoradiography with a stripping film technique. To determine the background activity skin sections from uninjected control mice were subjected to the same stripping film procedure. Another group of hairless mice was given one single pulse labelling with tritiated thymidine. The number of labelled mitoses was scored for 12 hr after the injection. At 10, 12 and 15 hr after the injection, the numbers of labelled basal and differentiating cells were also determined. A mathematical model of cell population kinetics in the epidermis has been suggested. The results of different simulations on this model were compared with the observed results. The curve of mean grain counts under continuous labelling increased from day to day with two well‐defined plateaux. The percentage of all labelled cells increased rapidly up to the 3rd day, and thereafter the curves gradually flattened off. When basal cells and differentiated cells were considered separately the labelling index of the basal cells increased rapidly for the first 3 days and then flattened off at the 100% level on the 5th day. The labelling index of the differentiating cells was low during the first 3–4 days. Then a steep increase in the percentage of labelled differentiating cells was seen, but the curve flattened off again close to the 100 % level after the 7th day. The labelled mitosis curve had its maximum 5 hr after the thymidine injection. The curve fell again to almost zero at 12 hr. Ten, 12 and 15 hr after the injection, 6, 7 and 7% respectively of the labelled cells were found in the spinous layer. It was concluded that three grains over each nucleus could be used as lower limit for considering a cell as labelled. On this basis, tritiated thymidine injections every 4th hour can be considered as continuous labelling.

The upper reference levels expected to be exceeded only by chance in 5% of single individual recordings at the ages of 20, 55 or 90 years, respectively, were estimated to be 12, 14 and 19 mm h-1 for men, and 18, 21 and 23 mm h-1 for women. Higher values should be controlled and, if confirmed, lead to a clinical check-up. However, about 76% of our overall material had ESR values lower than 9 mm h-1. Knowledge of each person's baseline ESR value might increase the disease-predictive ability of the test. If several measurements over years reveal a steeper rise with age than depicted in our population-based curves, it should be taken seriously, even when each reading is below the population-based reference limits.

No abstract