The coastal fisheries in Liberia comprise small-scale Kru and Fanti low technology canoes and open boats, as well as industrial trawlers. At the end of the war in 2003, foreign industrial trawlers dominated the coastal fisheries in Liberia. After the war, the industrial fleet declined rapidly from 60 in 2004 to 15 in 2010. Over the same period the local Kru canoes grew from <400 to over 2400 and the motorized Fanti boats increased from <200 to about 800. Since 2010, when the government established a six nautical mile inshore exclusion zone, the industrial fleet has continued to decline, the Fantis have remained fairly constant, but the Kru fleet has continued to expand, reaching 3800 canoes by 2019. This paper analyzes the technical efficiency and productivity of the SSF fleets in Liberia. Data were collected from 46 randomly chosen Kru and 86 Fanti boats. There is a considerable difference between the Kru and the Fanti boats in terms of quantities of inputs used and output produced. Mean efficiency of the Kru canoes was 0.53, while for the Fanti boats it was 0.70, indicating considerable inefficiencies and scope for technical improvement. Vessel length and skipper’s age are the two main factors significantly influencing technical efficiency of the Kru and Fanti boats. The younger Kru operators (≤40 years) using newer and smaller dugout canoes (≤6.1 m) were more efficient than the older fishers in older and larger canoes, while the opposite was true for the Fantis. There were efficient boats and inefficient vessels among the Kru and Fanti but on average they were profitable. However, the design of these vessels offers limited scope to introduce improved fishing technology. To address the current technological regress and increase productivity in the fisheries, it is recommended that the Liberian government explore new harvesting technologies such as fiberglass reinforced plastic in the coastal fisheries.
Many coastal fisheries are subject to harvesting externalities due to inadequate regulations compounded by limited enforcement. Coastal fisheries in Liberia consist of a fleet of dugout canoes (Kru) primarily targeting demersal finfish, larger open wooden boats propelled with outboard engines targeting small inshore pelagics (Fanti), and a small number of industrial trawlers employing midwater and bottom trawls targeting finfish and shrimp. This paper develops a bio-economic model for the coastal fisheries in Liberia and employs the model to identify economic optimal fishing effort and harvesting trajectories for the different coastal fleets. The results show under harvesting and disinvestments in the coastal fisheries in Liberia. In 2010 the Government of Liberia declared a six nautical mile inshore exclusion zone accessible only to small-scale fisheries (SSF), which was accompanied by increased enforcement. The coastal fleets in 2016 were profitable but the distribution of profits was tilted to the small-scale fleets. The government needs to evaluate what policy options are available to fully utilize the fisheries potential for different species complexes while at the same time reduce the risk of conflict and overharvesting. There appears to be a need for investment in new technologies, which can only take place if fishing in Liberia will remain profitable.
, ogmundur@unak.is Daði Már Kristófersson, Háskóli Íslands dmk@hi.is Helgi Gestsson, Háskólinn á Akureyri, helgig@unak.is ÁGRIP Íslenskur sjávarútvegur hefur nokkra sérstöðu samanborið við sjávarútveg nágrannaþjóðanna hvað varðar arðsemi. Margir hafa bent á að fyrirkomulag fiskveiðistjórnunar hefur áhrif á rekstrarhegðun útgerðarfyrirtaekja og þar með afkomu þeirra. Afar mikilvaegt er, þegar hugað er að breytingum á fiskveiðistjórnunarkerfinu, að fyrir liggi hvað það er sem leitt hefur til góðrar afkomu í íslenskum sjávarútvegi. Mikilvaegt er að breytingar á kerfinu tryggi áframhald þessarrar miklu verðmaetasköpunar.Fyrri rannsóknir höfunda hafa bent til þess að þeir þrír ytri þaettir sem hafa haft hvað mest áhrif á árangur virðiskeðjunnar hérlendis séu afnám útflutningshindrana, fiskveiðistjórnunarkerfið og stofnun fiskmarkaða á Íslandi. Niðurstöður rannsókna benda til þessa að fiskveiðistjórnarkerfið auki skilvirkni virðiskeðjunnar með því að draga úr sóknarkostnaði, auka sérhaefingu í veiðum, skapi hvata til að auka verðmaeti afla og tryggi stöðugleika framboðs hráefnis.Í þessari grein verða áhrif fiskveiðistjórnunarkerfisins á rekstur sjávarútvegsfyrirtaekja könnuð með tvennum haetti. Annars vegar er með djúpviðtölum við stjórnendur í sjávarútvegi könnuð sýn greinarinnar á þátt fiskveiðistjórnunarkerfisins á þróun virðiskeðju sjávarútvegs . Hins vegar eru gögn um afkomu greind og borin saman við sambaerileg gögn frá Noregi í þeim tilgangi að meta hvers vegna þróun hér varð önnur en þar og draga fram hugsanlegar ástaeður þess. ABSTRACTIn regards to profitability the Icelandic fishing industry stands out among the fishing industries of its neighboring countries. It has often been pointed out that the design of the fisheries management system affects the operational behavior of fishing companies, and thus their earnings. When changes in the fisheries management system are considered it's of vast importance that an extensive knowledge of the system's enablers of profitability has been acquired. Importantly, changes made to the system will still have to enable the industry to maintain such a high profitability.Former research by the authors has indicated that the three external factors that have significantly affected the effectiveness of the Icelandic fishing industry´s value chain are the abolishment of export barriers, the fisheries management system and the establishment of fish markets in Iceland. Research also indicates that the fisheries management system increases the efficiency of the industry´s value chain, leads to a decrease in the cost of
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.