Background Pulmonary vein isolation is the cornerstone of catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, with advanced left atrial (LA) structural changes, additional targeted catheter ablation of low‐voltage zones (LVZs) has produced favorable results. Therefore, with the advent of single‐shot techniques, it would be helpful to predict the presence of LVZs before an ablation procedure. Objective We hypothesized that computed tomography (CT)‐derived left atrial volume index (LAVI), in combination with other objective parameters, could be used to develop a score able to predict the presence of LVZs. Methods In a large cohort of patients undergoing their first AF ablations, comprehensive echocardiographic evaluations and cardiac CT were performed. During the electrophysiological studies, LA geometry and electroanatomic voltage maps were created. LVZs were defined as areas ≥1 cm2 with bipolar peak‐to‐peak voltage amplitudes ≤0.5 mV. Results In a derivation cohort of 374 patients, predictors of LVZs were identified by regression analysis and used to build the Zentralklinik Bad Berka and University of L'Aquila (ZAQ) score (age ≥65 years; female sex; and CT‐LAVI ≥57 mL/m2). The ZAQ score of 2 points accurately identified the presence and the extent of LVZs (area under the curve [AUC], 0.809; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.758‐0.861; P < .001 and 3 [interquartile range, IQR, 1.5‐4.5] vs 7 cm2 [IQR 4‐9]; P = .001). In a validation cohort of 103 patients, the predictive value of the score was confirmed (AUC, 0.793; 95% CI, 0.709‐0.878; P < .001 and 4 [IQR, 2‐7] vs 11.5 cm2 [IQR, 8‐16.5]; P = .001). Conclusions The ZAQ score identifies LVZs and may be useful for planning the ablation strategy ahead of time.
Background Pulmonary vein isolation is the cornerstone of catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, with advanced left atrial (LA) structural changes, additional targeted catheter ablation of low voltage zones (LVZs) has produced favorable results. Therefore, with the advent of single-shot techniques, it would be helpful to predict the presence of LVZs before an ablation procedure.
Introduction: Although pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) is very effective in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), in patients (pts) with persistent AF, PVI often is not sufficient. Many studies suggested that low voltage zones (LVZs) outside of the PV might be involved in the complex mechanisms perpetuating AF. However ablation strategies involving substrate modification (SM) did not show additional benefits in persistent AF pts. Those studies were performed before the introduction of contact force technology, and the most likely explanation for these results could be the inability to achieve effective transmural lesions and continuous linear ablation. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that the use of contact force technology would improve ablation efficacy. Therefore, we analyzed the long-term outcome after two different ablation strategies in pts with persistent AF depending on whether there was evidence of LVZs in the left atrium or not. Methods: The presence of LVZs were defined as sites of >3 adjacent low-voltage points <0.5 mV during electrophysiology study. Depending on the location of the LVZ, linear ablation was performed. Catheter ablation was performed using TactiCath™ or SmartTouch™ ablation catheters aiming at contact values ≥10g <20g and FTI >400g/s. Ablation was performed in a temperature-controlled fashion with energy of 30W except at the posterior wall (20-25W). Results: 121 consecutive pts with persistent AF (46 female, median age 66 [59-72] years, mean duration of AF 16 [7-73] months, CT derived LA volume index 66 [56-75]ml/m2) were included: pts without LVZs underwent PVI alone (n = 74), in pts with LVZs, PVI + SM (n = 47) was performed (mitral Isthmus line in 2, supero-septal line in 39, and roof line in 47; bidirectional block was achieved in 100%, 97%, and 100%, respectively). After a median follow-up of 13 [6-21] months, 86% of pts without and 78% with substrate were in sinus rhythm, mainly without antiarrhythmic drugs (89% PVI only, 84% PVI + SM). Conclusions: In patients with persistent AF without LVZs, PVI alone leads to excellent 2-year freedom from AF. In pts with LVZs, additional substrate modification with CF sensing technology is associated with improved success rates compared to previous studies.
Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Arrhythmias in elderly patients (pat) are common. In this subset of pat, atrial fibrillation is by far the most frequent sustained arrhythmia but not the only one. Clinical, ECG and electrophysiological (EP) features of AV-nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) have rarely been described in the elderly, and this represents the aim of the current study. Methods At 2 EP-centres in Germany, data from all pat undergoing an EP-study (EPS) and diagnosed with AVNRT between January 2018 and May 2021 were collected and analysed. Pat > 65 years constituted the study population. Results During the study period AVNRT was diagnosed in a total of 329 pat. 93 pat (28%) were > 65 years and represent the study population [median age 74 (65-89) years, 48% female]. In the majority (85%), the duration of symptoms was short (< 1 year), 14 pat had symptoms of paroxysmal tachycardia for longer than 10 years. Most of the pat (n=88, 94%) had at least one ECG-documentation. In SR, the PR interval was relatively long [median 180 (120-380) ms)]. In 84% of pat, sustained AVNRT [median cycle length (CL) 400 (270-800) ms] was induced during EPS. In the remaining pat, at least 2 typical AV-nodal-echo beats were induced. Slow pathway (SP) ablation/modification was performed in all but one patient presenting with a very long baseline PR-interval, low antegrade Wenckebach-point (WP) and very slow AVNRT. In this case, the pat was treated with ß-blocker after pacemaker (PM) implantation. In 3 additional pat, PM implantation was necessary after ablation due to intermittent high-degree AV-block. In comparison to the rest of the study population, these four pat had a longer baseline PQ interval [median 275 (IQR 248- 303) ms vs. 180 (IQR 160- 192) ms], a longer baseline AH interval [median 207ms (IQR 185- 234) ms vs. 95 (IQR 80- 107) ms], a lower baseline antegrade WP CL [median 510 (IQR 435- 645) vs. 390ms (IQR 355- 470) ms], and a longer tachycardia CL [TCL 557 (IQR 454- 661) ms vs. 400 (IQR 364- 443) ms; p value <0,01 for all comparisons]. The overall complication rate (other than AV block) was low (2 pat with AV fistula treated conservatively) and comparable to the one described in younger pat. Discussion Elderly pat also have AVNRT, there are a slight differences in physiology (i.e. relatively long baseline PR-interval and TCL, likely due to changes of the conduction system with aging), and as in young pat, ablation is curative treatment with similar (low) complication rate. A subset of pat, characterized by longer PR- and AH-intervals, lower WP and longer TCL may be at higher risk for AV-block after SP modification. Whether this is due to pre-existing damage or to posterior location of the FP remains unknown. SP ablation is safe and effective even in elderly pat. In pat presenting with EP characteristics presumptive of a baseline impairment of the conduction properties of the FP, ablation of the FP could be attempted to avoid postprocedural high degree AV block.
No abstract
Aims Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) often is not sufficient in patients (pts) with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Substrate modification (SM) by catheter ablation (CA) of low-voltage zones (LVZ) has yielded favourable results, but those studies were performed before the introduction of contact force (CF) sensing technology. Surgical ablation (SA) studies support the hypothesis that empiric bi-atrial linear ablation (Cox Maze IV procedure) is able to improve success, but there is less data on outcome of patients undergoing left atrial (LA) linear lesions alone. In current guidelines, both CA and SA have Class IIa indication in pts with persistent AF. In this single-centre retrospective study, we analysed the long-term outcomes of CA and SA in pts with persistent AF. Methods and results In the CA group (Figure 1), pts underwent PVI and additional SM in the presence of LVZ (roof line and supero-septal line) using TactiCath™ or SmartTouch™ ablation catheters aiming at contact values ≥10 g < 20 g and FTI >400 g/s. Ablation was performed in a temperature-controlled fashion with energy of 30 W except at the posterior wall (20–25 W). In the SA group (Figure 2), pts underwent ablation procedure (creation of a pure LA endocardial lesion set consistent with the Cox Maze IV) performed by a right mini-thoracotomy approach using the Atricure™ cryoablation probe, a left atrial appendage (LAA) epicardial exclusion using the Atriclip™ system, and mitral valve repair in the presence of severe mitral valve regurgitation. No right atrial lesions were created. 196 pts were included. 120 pts underwent CA [median age: 65 (58–72) years, median LA volume index (LAVI): 66 (56–75) ml/m2], in pts with LVZs PVI + SM was performed [bidirectional block of lines in 100%]. 76 pts underwent SA [median age: 64 (58–74) years, median LAVI 90 (78–103) ml/m2], in 42 pts a mitral valve repair was performed. At 24 months (figure), 89% and 68% of pts were free of AF in the SA and CA group, respectively, mainly without antiarrhythmic drugs (92% SA group and 89% CA group). Conclusions In patients with persistent AF, SA performed by a right mini-thoracotomy approach with linear lesions limited to LA leads to excellent 2-year freedom from AF despite significantly larger LAVI compared with the CA group. LAA epicardial exclusion likely contributed to surgical efficacy by eliminating the LAA as trigger/driver.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.