Biomarkers are increasingly used in drug development to aid scientific and clinical decisions regarding the progress of candidate and marketed therapeutics. Biomarkers can improve the understanding of diseases as well as therapeutic and off-target effects of drugs. Early implementation of biomarker strategies thus promises to reduce costs and time-to-market as drugs proceed through increasingly costly and complex clinical development programs. The 2003 American Association of Pharmaceutical Sciences/Clinical Ligand Assay Society Biomarkers Workshop (Salt Lake City, UT, USA, October 24-25, 2003) addressed key issues in biomarker research, with an emphasis on the validation and implementation of biochemical biomarker assays, covering from preclinical discovery of efficacy and toxicity biomarkers through clinical and postmarketing implementation. This summary report of the workshop focuses on the major issues discussed during presentations and open forums and noted consensus achieved among the participants on topics from nomenclature to best practices. For example, it was agreed that because reliable and accurate data provide the basis for sound decision making, biomarker assays must be validated in a manner that enables the creation of such data. The nature of biomarker measurements often precludes direct application of regulatory guidelines established for clinical diagnostics or drug bioanalysis, and future guidance on biomarker assay validation should therefore be adaptable enough that validation criteria do not stifle creative biomarker solutions.

Liver X-receptor (LXR) agonists have been postulated to enhance reverse cholesterol transport (RCT), a process believed to shuttle cholesterol from the periphery back to the liver. Enhancing RCT via the upregulation of cholesterol transporters such as the adenosine triphosphate-binding cassettes ABCA1 and ABCG1 could therefore inhibit the progression of atherosclerosis. LXR-623 is a synthetic ligand for LXRs alpha and beta that has shown promise in animal models of atherosclerosis. The authors present results from a single ascending-dose study of the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of LXR-623 in healthy participants. LXR-623 was absorbed rapidly with peak concentrations (C(max)) achieved at approximately 2 hours. The C(max) and area under the concentration-time curve increased in a dose-proportional manner. The mean terminal disposition half-life was between 41 and 43 hours independently of dose. LXR activation resulted in a dose-dependent increase in ABCA1 and ABCG1 expression. The effect of LXR-623 concentration on ABCA1 and ABCG1 expression was further characterized via a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis, yielding EC(50) estimates of 526 ng/mL and 729 ng/mL, respectively. Central nervous system-related adverse events were observed at the 2 top doses tested. The pharmacodynamic effects described here are the first demonstration of "target engagement" by an LXR agonist in humans.

No abstract

The contribution of angiotensin-(1-7) [Ang-(1-7)] to the antihypertensive actions of omapatrilat, a novel vasopeptidase inhibitor, was evaluated in 22 salt-sensitive, low renin, hypertensive subjects as a substudy of a multicenter randomized, double-blind, parallel study of 4 weeks duration. A total of 25 other subjects received lisinopril as the active control. Omapatrilat (40 mg) produced sustained control of blood pressure (BP) (as assessed by 24-h ambulatory BP measurements) that was significantly greater than that produced by 20 mg daily of lisinopril. The antihypertensive response to either drug was accompanied by similar sustained inhibition of angiotensin converting enzyme activity. Plasma levels of angiotensin I (Ang I), angiotensin II (Ang II) and Ang-(1-7) were not altered by treatment with either omapatrilat or lisinopril, even though both regimens produced a modest rise in plasma renin activity. In contrast, urinary excretion rates of Ang I and Ang-(1-7) but not Ang II increased significantly throughout the dosing period of subjects who were given omapatrilat, whereas the smaller antihypertensive response produced by lisinopril had a smaller and transient effect on increasing urinary excretion rates of Ang-(1-7). Omapatrilat, being a single molecule inhibiting neutral endopeptidase and converting enzyme simultaneously, controlled salt-sensitive hypertension by a mechanism that was associated with sustained increases in urinary Ang-(1-7) excretion. We suggest that Ang-(1-7) may be a component of the mechanisms by which omapatrilat induces an antihypertensive response in salt sensitive hypertension.

In this model, single oral doses of 10 mg BMS-186716 and 20 mg fosinopril induced similar 24-hour in vivo angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition. BMS-186716, 10 mg, increased urinary atrial natriuretic peptide and blunted the expected decrease in plasma atrial natriuretic peptide caused by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition. BMS-186716, 10 mg, did not inhibit plasma active renin rise compared with 20 mg fosinopril. A single oral dose of 10 mg BMS-186716 had a shorter blood pressure-lowering effect than 20 mg fosinopril.