The Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) data was acquired within the area suspected to have high potential for bitumen occurrence using the Wenner-Schlumberger configuration in Agbabu, southwestern Nigeria. PASI 16GL-N Earth resistivity meter instrument was used to acquire data along five (5) traverses with 5m electrode spacing and traverses length of 150m. The apparent resistivity values obtained was processed using RES2DINV software which helped to automatically obtain the 2D inversion model of the subsurface. This study has shown the occurrence of bitumen between the depth of 13.4m and 9.93m for Traverses 1, 2, 3 and Traverses 4, 5 respectively in a 2-Dimensional electrical resistivity images for boreholes with a depth of about 18m. The results indicate that the bitumen is characterized by good lateral continuity and is sufficiently thick for commercial exploitation.
The Dipole –Dipole array was used for Constant Separation Traversing (CST) to investigate subsurface lithology in Oredide village, Auchi, Edo state with a view to determining the vulnerability or otherwise of the menace of erosion in the area. All the traverses were carried out with electrode spacing of 10 m with a spread of 200 m. The data was obtained using Pasi terrameter (16-GL) and processed with the Dipro software. The results revealed that the subsurface is underlain by the topsoil, lateritic sand, sand and sandstone. 2D results indicate topsoil with resistivity value range of 309 to 40130 Ωm within the depth range of 0 to 5 m. The second layer corresponds to sandy, lateritic sand, sand and sandstone having resistivity values ranging from 2186 to 60350 Ωm to a depth of 10.0 m. The third layer has resistivity values indicating lateritic sand, sand and sandstone layer with resistivity values ranging from 2186 to 60350 within the depth of 20 m. The fourth layer connotes lateritic sand, sand and sandstone to a depth of 30 m. The fifth horizon has resistivity values in the range of 585.2 to 35732.4 Ωm which is representative of sand and sandstone.The maximum depth imaged was 47.7 m.The inverted 2-D resistivity structure shows high resistivity distribution near-surface >1000 Ωm, which are indications of vulnerabilities to erosion in the study area with depth of scouring being 15 m.
Fifteen (15) Vertical Electrical Sounding (VES) and three (3) Constant Separation Traversing (CST) data were acquired within the study area using Pasi Terrameter (model 16GL). The Schlumberger electrode array was deployed for the VES while Wenner array was used for the 2-D CST. Both qualitative and quantitative approach were used for the VES measurements. The raw data were Curve-matched and inversion of the data using WinResist (1.0) to create a model of perfect fit indicating layer thickness and resistivity values for individual layers while the 2D resistivity data were processed using Res2Dinv software. The 2D resistivity structures revealed the lateral and the vertical variations of the subsurface information having resistivity values ranging from 81.8 to 5250 Ωm. The geoelectric sections revealed five to six geoelectric layers, which correspond to the topsoil, clayey sand, lateritic clayey sand and sand. The topsoil is characterized by resistivity values ranging from 29.8 to 358.5 Ωm and layer thickness of 0.6 to 0.8 m. The clayey sand had resistivity and layer thickness values ranging from 81.4 to 278.0 Ωm and 2.4 to 7.1 m respectively. The lateritic clayey sand had resistivity values ranging from 782.0 to 2414.1 Ωm. and layer thickness of 5.4 to 61.2 m. The sand in the third layer in VES 1 to 7, 9 and 10 has resistivity values ranging from 398.6 to 600.7 Ωm and layer thickness of 2.3 to 25 3 m is characterized as seasonal aquifer. The result of this study has further highlighted the capabilities of the electrical resistivity techniques in groundwater investigation
Electrical Resistivity Imaging (ERI) and Vertical Electrical Sounding (VES) were deployed over Uruagu landslide area. The main purpose of the geoelectrical resistivity surveys was to characterize the landslide failure parameters in order to identify the soil failure mechanisms. Ten profiles of 2D Electrical Resistivity Imaging (ERI) measuring 200 m each, and thirty Vertical Electrical Sounding (VES), with three VES along each profile, were executed. Nine of the ten profiles were executed within the landslide site while one profile was executed in a residential street as a control profile. Four soil samples were also taken for physical and geotechnical laboratory index analysis. The PASI resistivity meter was used for the geoelectrical resistivity measurements. The Wenner-Schlumberger array was deployed for the ERI with a minimum electrode spacing of 10 m. The Schlumberger array was deployed for the VES with a maximum current spacing of 130 m. ERI resistivity data analysis involved inversion using RES2DINV software package involving mean model residual and construction of iso-apparent resistivity contour maps. VES resistivity data analysis involved calculated parameters from plotted field data on log-log graph then used as initial models in an iterative forward modeling WinResist software package. The results of the ERI and VES for the control profile reveal that the subsurface strata are originally composed of silty clay of resistivity values (16.7 – 60.9) Ωm, clayey silty sand having resistivity values (116 – 800) Ωm and sandstone layer with resistivity values (>814 Ωm). The ERI and VES results for the devastated landslide site reveal counteraction material of resistivity values (>814 Ωm), colluvia and regoliths (116 - 300 Ωm) and variably wet weathered sandstones of resistivity values (<60.9 Ωm). The laboratory results revealed the landslide site is majorly composed of silty sandy clay, silty clay, sandy silty clay and sandstones as the pre-landslide existing lithologies. The natural water content ranges from 10.6% to 14.0%. The liquid limit ranges from 44.0% to 46.0%, the plastic limit ranges from 15.0% to 17.0% and the plasticity index from 28.0% to 29.1%. The geophysical and laboratory results revealed consistency in the lithological units in agreement to the characteristic geology of the study area. The landslide site has high gully slope gradients and collects large volume of floods during intense rainy season. These soils during intense rainfall, imbibe more water, following their high plasticity, slid along the sandstone to activate the soil failure.
A total of three electrical imaging lines were measured using the Wenner configuration. And a total of fifteen VES was carried out within the area of investigation and six water samples was collected. The results were presented as profiles, model sections, inverted sections and tables. Interpretations of these results involve both qualitative and quantitative deductions from 1D and 2D geoelectric models and laboratory analysis for the water analysis. The VES data were processed by partial curve matching to generate the 1st order geoelectric parameters and inverted in 1D using the WinResist. The 2D resistivity data were processed by inversion using the DIPROFWIN to generate the 2D resistivity section across each traverse while the water samples were taken to the laboratory for comprehensive analysis. The 2D resistivity structures reveal the lateral and the vertical subsurface information with resistivity values ranging from 0.130 to 4741 Ωm. The resistivity values are representative of the clay, clay (saline), clayey sand (saline), clayey sand and sand. From the quantitative interpretation five to six distinct layers were identified. The layers are: topsoil, clayey sand, clay, saline clayey sand, saline clay and sand. The resistivity of the topsoil varies from 38.2 Ωm to 155.3 Ohm-m. The resistivity of the sand varies from 100.8 Ωm to 115.8 Ωm. The resistivity of clayey sand varies from 56.6 Ωm to 90.1 Ωm. The resistivity of clay varies from 12.7 Ωm to 41.2 Ωm. The resistivity of the saline layer (saline clayey sand/clay) varies from 2.1 Ωm to 51.2 Ωm. The depth of saline clay interface varies from 25.7 m to 72.6 m. The depth to the saline clayey sand interface varies from 25.7 - 72.6 m. The chemical analysis of water samples showed that the pH varies from 7.05 to 8.42, total dissolved solids vary from 1786 to 2116 mg/L and electrical conductivity varies from 2106 to 2656 µS/cm. The anions and cation concentrations such as Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, K+, Cl- and HCO3- ranges from 158 to 185 mg/L, 36 to 48 mg/L, 222 to 287 mg/L, 3.2 to 3.8 mg/L, 10.86 to 20.87 mg/L and 2.33 to 3.88 mg/L respectively. The ratio of Cl/HCO3- ion ranges from 4.05 to 7.67. The interpreted results show saline water intrusion where they occur in different part of the area investigated. The results showed the effectiveness and usefulness of electrical resistivity method in mapping saline water intrusion problem in coastal areas. However, it is necessary to carry out integrated geophysical surveys involving electrical resistivity and induced polarization methods prior to drilling in the study area.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.