ObjectiveComparison of recent national survey data on prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in England, the USA and Canada, and correlation of these parameters with each country stroke and ischaemic heart disease (IHD) mortality.DesignNon-institutionalised population surveys.Setting and participantsEngland (2006 n=6873), the USA (2007–2010 n=10 003) and Canada (2007–2009 n=3485) aged 20–79 years.OutcomesStroke and IHD mortality rates were plotted against countries’ specific prevalence data.ResultsMean systolic blood pressure (SBP) was higher in England than in the USA and Canada in all age–gender groups. Mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was similar in the three countries before age 50 and then fell more rapidly in the USA, being the lowest in the USA. Only 34% had a BP under 140/90 mm Hg in England, compared with 50% in the USA and 66% in Canada. Prehypertension and stages 1 and 2 hypertension prevalence figures were the highest in England. Hypertension prevalence (≥140 mm Hg SBP and/or ≥90 mm Hg DBP) was lower in Canada (19·5%) than in the USA (29%) and England (30%). Hypertension awareness was higher in the USA (81%) and Canada (83%) than in England (65%). England also had lower levels of hypertension treatment (51%; USA 74%; Canada 80%) and control (<140/90 mm Hg; 27%; the USA 53%; Canada 66%). Canada had the lowest stroke and IHD mortality rates, England the highest and the rates were inversely related to the mean SBP in each country and strongly related to the blood pressure indicators, the strongest relationship being between low hypertension awareness and stroke mortality.ConclusionsWhile the current prevention efforts in England should result in future-improved figures, especially at younger ages, these data still show important gaps in the management of hypertension in these countries, with consequences on stroke and IHD mortality.
Background: In Canada, pertussis is an endemic and cyclical disease, with peaks occurring at two-to five-year intervals. Although pertussis incidence varies by age group, unvaccinated or undervaccinated infants are at greatest risk of infection and associated complications. Since the last National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) recommendations published in 2014, new evidence on the safety and effectiveness of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and reduced acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine administration in pregnancy has become available. Objective: To provide guidance on maternal immunization in pregnancy as a strategy to reduce disease incidence and severe outcomes (defined as hospitalization or death) from pertussis infection in infants less than 12 months of age. Methods: The NACI reviewed evidence on the burden of disease in Canada, vaccine safety and immunogenicity and vaccine effectiveness in jurisdictions that have implemented maternal immunization programs. A total of 59 articles were identified, retrieved and included in the literature review to inform this statement. Results: In the majority of reviewed studies, post immunization increases in antibody levels resulted in more than 90% of women achieving anti-PT levels greater than or equal to 10 IU/ml one month following immunization. In infants, maternal immunization was found to result in increased pertussis antibody concentrations. In the majority of studies, following the receipt of the fourth diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis (DTaP) dose after 15 months of age, no statistically significant differences in antibody levels and avidity were observed between infants whose mothers received Tdap in pregnancy and those whose mothers did not receive Tdap in pregnancy. No major maternal or infant safety issues, including pregnancy outcomes, were reported in the reviewed literature. Effectiveness of maternal Tdap immunization in pregnancy was estimated to be over 90% against pertussis in infants younger than two months of age, with no deaths observed among infants whose mothers received Tdap prior to 36 weeks of pregnancy. Maternal immunization with Tdap in pregnancy also resulted in a reduction in infant disease severity and hospitalization. Vaccine effectiveness was also reported to persist after the receipt of the first three DTaP doses, with immunization in pregnancy resulting in additional protection of up to 70% in children whose mothers received Tdap in pregnancy. Conclusion: There is now strong evidence to support the NACI recommendation that immunization with Tdap vaccine should be offered in every pregnancy. This is ideally administered between 27 and 32 weeks of gestation but evidence also supports providing maternal Tdap over a wider range of gestational ages, from 13 weeks up to the time of delivery, in view of programmatic and unique patient considerations.
Background: Human immune globulin (Ig) products are currently recommended as post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for measles in certain susceptible groups. However, successful measles vaccination programs in North America have led to low circulation of measles virus and most blood donors now have vaccine-derived immunity. Concurrently, the concentrations of antimeasles antibodies in human Ig products have shown trends of gradual decline and previously recommended doses and routes of administration may no longer be optimally protective.Objectives: To review the literature and update recommendations on post-exposure prophylaxis for measles, including dosing and route of administration, for measles Ig PEP in susceptible infants and in individuals who are immunocompromised or pregnant, in order to prevent severe disease.Approach: The National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) Measles, Mumps, Rubella, Varicella Working Group reviewed key literature, international practices, and product information for current Ig products pertaining to the optimal dosage and routes of Ig administration for measles PEP. It then proposed evidence-based changes to the PEP recommendations that were considered and approved by NACI.Results: NACI continues to recommend that susceptible immunocompetent individuals six months of age and older, who are exposed to measles and who have no contraindications be given measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine within 72 hours of the exposure. NACI recommends that for susceptible infants younger than six months of age, if injection volume is not a major concern, intramuscular immunoglobulin (IMIg) should be provided at a concentration of 0.5 mL/kg, to a maximum dose of 15 mL administered over multiple injection sites. Susceptible infants six to 12 months old who are identified after 72 hours and within six days of measles exposure should receive IMIg (0.5 mL/kg) if injection volume is not a major concern. For susceptible contacts who are pregnant or immunocompromised, if injection volume is not a concern, IMIg can be provided at a concentration of 0.5 mL/kg understanding that recipients 30 kg or more will not receive the measles antibody concentrations that are considered to be fully protective. Alternatively, in cases where injection volume is a major concern or for recipients 30 kg or more, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) can be provided at a dose of 400 mg/kg. NACI does not recommend that susceptible immunocompetent individuals older than 12 months of age receive Ig PEP for measles exposure due to the low risk of disease complications and the practical challenges of administration for case and contact management.Conclusion: NACI has updated the recommendations for measles PEP to reflect current evidence and best practices in order to prevent severe disease in Canada. Consistent with recommendations in other countries, this includes consideration of off-label use of IVIg in some instances. Affiliations
Background: The severity of hepatitis A (HA) increases with age. Children less than six years of age are commonly asymptomatic or present with mild disease without jaundice and represent an important source of infection, particularly for household members and other close contacts. In older children and adults, HA is typically symptomatic. Older persons and individuals with chronic liver disease and immunocompromising conditions have an increased risk of progressing to fulminant hepatic failure resulting in death. Immunization with HA vaccine is recommended for pre-exposure immunization of persons at increased risk of infection or severe HA, as well as within 14 days of HA exposure for: susceptible household and close contacts of proven or suspected cases of HA; co-workers and clients of infected food handlers; and staff and attendees of group child care centres and kindergartens where HA has occurred. Canada's National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) has previously recommended HA vaccination for persons one year of age and over. Objectives: To make recommendations for the use of HA vaccine in infants less than one year of age and to clarify recommendations for the post-exposure use of human immune globulin (Ig). Methods: The NACI Hepatitis Working Group (HWG) performed literature reviews and reviewed vaccine manufacturer provided data on the topic of HA post-exposure prophylaxis. All evidence was rated and reported in evidence tables. A knowledge synthesis was performed and NACI approved specific evidence-based recommendations, elucidating the rationale and relevant considerations. Results: No studies on the efficacy or effectiveness of HA-containing vaccines in children six to less than 12 months of age were identified through the literature search. Receipt of two doses of HA-containing vaccines was found to be safe and immunogenic in infants six to 12 months of age. Limited data were available regarding HA-containing vaccine immunogenicity in adults over the age of 40 years. Conclusion: There are now new NACI recommendations on HA vaccine and post-exposure use of Ig.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.