The destructive growth and collapse of cavitation bubbles are used for therapeutic purposes in focused ultrasound procedures and can contribute to tissue damage in traumatic injuries. Histotripsy is a focused ultrasound procedure that relies on controlled cavitation to homogenize soft tissue. Experimental studies of histotripsy cavitation have shown that the extent of ablation in different tissues depends on tissue mechanical properties and waveform parameters. Variable tissue susceptibility to the large stresses, strains, and strain rates developed by cavitation bubbles has been suggested as a basis for localized liver tumor treatments that spare large vessels and bile ducts. However, field quantities developed within microns of cavitation bubbles are too localized and transient to measure in experiments. Previous numerical studies have attempted to circumvent this challenge but made limited use of realistic tissue property data. In this study, numerical simulations are used to calculate stress, strain, and strain rate fields produced by bubble oscillation under histotripsy forcing in a variety of tissues with literature-sourced viscoelastic and acoustic properties. Strain field calculations are then used to predict a theoretical damage radius using tissue ultimate strain data. Simulation results support the hypothesis that differential tissue

Few reported cases discuss distinguishing between melanoma and melanoacanthoma, a seborrheic keratosis (SK) variant, using noninvasive imaging devices. We present a case of a 38-year-old man with Fitzpatrick skin type IV with an asymmetric black papule showing clinical and dermoscopic features of both melanoma and SK. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) and dynamic optical coherence tomography (d-OCT) were used for further evaluation. RCM revealed acanthotic epidermis with a mixed honeycomb and cobblestone pattern, polycyclic bulbous rete ridges, and bright plump cells within entrapped, edged, dermal papillae, compatible with pigmented SK. Also noted were a population of fairly uniform bright dendritic cells scattered quite evenly at all levels of the epidermis and the notable absence of concomitant features of a melanocytic neoplasm (roundish Pagetoid cells, sheets of roundish or dendritic cells at the dermal-epidermal junction, junctional thickenings, and melanocytic nests), suggesting melanoacanthoma. d-OCT showed well-circumscribed, regular, epidermal acanthosis, superficial rounded hypodense structures, normal vascular flow, and notable absence of wiry or contoured vessels, features typically seen in SKs and benign lesions, respectively. Similarly, histologic examination revealed characteristics of pigmented SK containing a population of evenly dispersed dendritic melanocytes (decorated using Melan-A stain) confirming a diagnosis of melanoacanthoma. This case highlights the advantages of incorporating both RCM and d-OCT into clinical practice to noninvasively differentiate melanoma from its clinical mimickers.

e15600 Background: Focused ultrasound (FUS) is a noninvasive, nonionizing, repeatable local ablative therapy that induces mechanical fractionation or thermal necrosis of a variety of solid tumors including hepatocellular carcinoma, prostate cancer, and desmoid fibromatosis. Recent feasibility studies in animal models have demonstrated the possibility of designing focused ultrasound treatments that are selective (e.g. spare healthy tissue, nerves, and blood vessels) due to differences in tissue and tumor mechanical properties. Given wide variation in individual tumor and patient characteristics, mechanics-based predictions of ablation zone features in different tissues under a range of FUS device settings are needed to permit personalized treatment planning. Methods: A finite difference computational method is used to simulate FUS ablation of tissues with variable mechanical properties (shear moduli of 0.6 – 200 kPa) under different FUS sonication parameters (frequency and peak pressure). The model calculates strain fields contributing to tissue ablation in FUS treatments which are used to predict ablation zone radii and boundary characteristics. Simulation predictions in model tissues are then compared to histology obtained from FUS-treated porcine tissue samples with similar mechanical properties. Results: The mechanical properties of model tissues and FUS treatment parameters have distinct effects on predicted minimum ablation zone radii. For example, smaller ablation zone radii are achieved in stiffer vessel wall than liver under given FUS sonication parameters. In each tissue, lower frequency and higher peak pressure FUS sonication predict a larger ablation zone. Combined variation of sonication frequency and peak pressure are found to achieve wider variation in ablation zone radius than previously achieved with frequency variation alone. Predicted ablation zone radii and boundary characteristics are consistent with the observed histology of FUS-treated tissues. Conclusions: Results show that simulations accounting for tissue mechanical properties and device settings can predict tissue selectivity and ablation zone characteristics observed in FUS procedures. This study demonstrates the potential of using noninvasive measurements of tissue and tumor properties obtained, for example, via shear wave elastography, in combination with micromechanical tissue ablation simulations to develop personalized, selective focused ultrasound treatments for solid tumors.

No abstract