No abstract

The use of molecularly targeted agents has dramatically improved the prognosis of defined subsets of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harboring somatically activated oncogenes, such as mutant EGFR or rearranged ALK. However, after initial marked responses to EGFR or ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), almost all patients inevitably progress due to development of acquired resistance. Multiple molecular mechanisms of resistance have been identified; the best characterized are secondary mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the oncogene, such as T790M in EGFR and L1196M in ALK, which prevent target inhibition by the corresponding TKI. Other mechanisms include copy number gain of the ALK fusion gene and the activation of bypass signaling pathways that can maintain downstream proliferation and survival signals despite inhibition of the original drug target. Here, the authors provide an overview of the known mechanisms of resistance to TKIs and outline the therapeutic strategies, including new investigational agents and targeted therapies combinations, that have been developed to overcome resistance.

Elevated expression levels of the apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) have been correlated with the more aggressive phenotypes and poor prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to assess the impact of the inhibition of the redox function of APE1 with E3330 either alone or in combination with cisplatin in NSCLC cells. For this purpose, complementary endpoints focusing on cell viability, apoptosis, cell cycle distribution, and migration/invasion were studied. Cisplatin decreased the viability of H1975 cells in a time- and concentration-dependent manner, with IC50 values of 9.6 µM for crystal violet assay and 15.9 µM for 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (MTS) assay. E3330 was clearly cytotoxic for concentrations above 30 µM. The co-incubation of E3330 and cisplatin significantly decreased cell viability compared to cisplatin alone. Regarding cell cycle distribution, cisplatin led to an increase in sub-G1, whereas the co-treatment with E3330 did not change this profile, which was then confirmed in terms of % apoptotic cells. In addition, the combination of E3330 and cisplatin at low concentrations decreased collective and chemotactic migration, and also chemoinvasion, by reducing these capabilities up to 20%. Overall, these results point to E3330 as a promising compound to boost cisplatin therapy that warrants further investigation in NSCLC.

No abstract

No abstract