The region comprises parts of the southern zone of the Abitibi greenstone belt and of the Bellecombe gneiss belt, and the Belleterre–Angliers greenstone belt. The stratigraphic sequence of the Abitibi Belt consists of (1) a lower ultramafic division; (2) a middle tholeiitic division; and (3) an upper diverse division; these divisions lap onto an older volcanic sequence to the north and west. In the Bellecombe Belt, sediments overlie the lower ultramafic division; these sediments coarsen toward the Abitibi Belt and toward the stratigraphic top. The volcanic rocks of the Belleterre–Angliers Belt overlie the sediments of the Bellecombe Belt.Five paleogeographic phases have been recognized. During phase I, a deep marine ultramafic lava plain covered the south part of the Abitibi Belt and the Bellecombe Belt. Faulting took place at the Duparquet–Destor break. During phase II, tholeiitic basalts formed a deep marine lava plain in the west of the Abitibi Belt, whereas flows erupted mainly from central volcanic complexes in the east. Simultaneously, sediments derived from a volcanic–plutonic hinterland to the north began to accumulate in the Bellecombe Belt. In phase III, lavas of the upper diverse division erupted from well defined central volcanic complexes in the Abitibi Belt, and sedimentation continued in the Bellecombe Belt. In phase IV, volcanic centers built above sea level, and local fans of tuff and of volcanic-derived conglomerate and sandstone interfingered with the volcanic–plutonic-derived sediments at the southern limit of the Abitibi Belt. The volcanic sequence was uplifted at the Cadillac break during phase V, with consequent progradation of coarse conglomerates southward.The stratigraphic and paleogeographic evolution of the Abitibi Belt is comparable to the evolution of immature oceanic island arcs in the Cenozoic.

Textural criteria permit distinction between the pre-Kenoran and Kenoran phases of plutonism and metamorphism. The pre-Kenoran plutons and pre-Kenoran metamorphic phases are directly related to the volcanic evolution. Synvolcanic tonalite–trondhjemite plutons and swarms of mafic and felsic dykes core central volcanic complexes. The volcanic rocks underwent three types of pre-Kenoran metamorphism, namely, a pervasive alteration, a thermal contact metamorphism that affected narrow aureoles around synvolcanic plutons, and a high-intensity hydrothermal alteration that affected cross-cutting pipes in central volcanic complexes.Synkinematic Kenoran metamorphism resulted in the growth of minerals (chlorite, actinolite, etc.) parallel to schistosities. Synkinematic metamorphic grade ranges form the pumpellyite–prehnite facies to the amphibolite facies. Late- to post-kinematic metamorphic phases resulted in the growth of minerals across schistosities. Syn- to post-kinematic plutons are not voluminous in the part of the Abitibi Belt described here, but they underlie vast areas in the Bellecombe Belt. They range from gneissose early synkinematic plutons to late-kinematic plutons that have well preserved igneous textures.The paleogeographic, tectonic, plutonic, and metamorphic histories of the Abitibi and Bellecombe belts are reviewed and we conclude that the belts are analogous to an island arc – fore-arc basin system.

In this paper, we describe the relations between the paleogeographic and tectonic evolution of the southwestern part of the Archean Abitibi and Bellecombe belts. Volcanism in the Abitibi Belt created a very thick, anisotropic plate composed of competent volcanic rocks and broken by the Duparquet–Destor break. The depocenters of the upper division of diverse volcanic rocks subsided about 10 km relative to their surroundings, and some central volcanic complexes within this division were consolidated by synvolcanic plutons and their thermal metamorphic aureole. The Cadillac break, a normal fault, separated the Abitibi and Bellecombe belts. The latter consisted of comparatively incompetent sedimentary rocks on top of a basement composed of ultramafic–mafic flows.North–south compression of the volcanic terrain during the Kenoran Orogeny produced a set of flexure folds, F1, that curve around the consolidated cores of central volcanic complexes generally in an easterly direction. Synclinoria nucleated at the deeply subsident depocenters of the upper diverse division. Further north–south flattening and subvertical stretching produced the east-trending F2 folds, their axial-plane schistosity S2, and local superposed schistosities S3 and S4. Southward verging recumbent folds suggest that the Bellecombe Belt simultaneously was pulled northward below the Abitibi Belt. During the orogeny, the Duparquet–Destor and Cadillac breaks were transformed to thrust faults; the Duparquet–Destor break also shows minor (< 3 km) right-lateral strike slip. Diapiric rise of late- to post-kinematic plutons locally distorted earlier schistosities.

The Roy Group in the Chibougamau area of the Abitibi subprovince, Southeastern Superior craton, Quebec, exemplifies Archean volcanic evolution. The Roy Group formed in two volcanic cycles, with voluminous basal mafic tholeiitic volcanic rocks being capped by a thin succession of calc-alkaline felsic volcanic rocks, banded iron formations, and cherts that represent regional stratigraphic markers. The Gilman Formation is thought to represent the mafic base of the 2nd Roy Group volcanic cycle. Our new mapping reveals that the Gilman Formation (North of the Lac Doré Layered intrusive complex) can be subdivided into a tholeiitic lower part (David member), a calc-alkaline extrusive sequence (Allard member), and a tholeiitic, more mafic upper part (Bruneau Formation, newly defined here). New U–Pb zircon ages on Allard member tuffs (2726.6 ± 0.7 Ma) are within error of those obtained from rhyolites of the Waconichi Formation (2728.2–2728.7 Ma), which underlies the Gilman Formation. These ages, along with geochemical and lithological similarities, imply that the Allard member belongs to the Waconichi Formation and that the David member occupies the same stratigraphic position as the Obatogamau Formation. The upper part of the former Gilman Formation is reassigned to the new Bruneau Formation. A thin transitional calc-alkaline basalt unit at the base of the Allard member is geochemically similar to basalts occurring at the top of the Lemoine member of the Waconichi Formation near the Lemoine mine, suggesting that the Allard member is slightly younger than the Lemoine member, and that its base (also associated with iron formation, breccia, and chert) represents a regional stratigraphic break favourable for volcanogenic-hosted massive sulphide (VHMS) exploration.