Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

EU-FP7-HEALTH-2009, REBORNE Project (GA: 241876).

Purpose Our aim was to clarify the effective decrease in blood transfusion after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from a multimodal blood-loss prevention approach (MBLPA) and the related risk factors of blood transfusion. Methods We retrospectively compared the rate of postoperative blood transfusion in 418 cases of primary TKA during 2010 from a single institution with two different groups of patients, allocating cases to the group with MBLPA (group 1, study group, N =71) and controls to the group without MBLPA (group 2, standard group, N =347). MBLPA procedure included pre-operative haemoglobin (Hb) optimisation; femoral canal obturation; limited incision and release; periand intra-articular use of saline with adrenalin, morpheic chloride, tobramycin, betamethasone and ropivacaine; tourniquet release after skin closure; 24 hour drain under atmospheric pressure; and two doses of tranexamic acid (TXA) IV. In the control group, surgeons followed the standard procedure without blood-saving techniques. Case-control comparison and blood transfusion risk factors were analysed. Results Group 1 had a zero transfusion rate (0/71), whereas 27.4 % of patients (95/347) in group 2 received allogenic blood transfusion. Significant transfusion risk factors were pre-operative Hb <12 g/dl), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status III and nonobese body mass index (BMI); Age and gender were not significant risk factors. Conclusions MBLPA in primary TKA was highly effective, with a zero transfusion rate. Risk factors for transfusion were determined, and eliminating them contributed to the avoidance of allogeneic blood transfusion in our study series.

Background and study aim: Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMP) frequently lack of clinical data on efficacy to substantiate a future clinical use. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy to heal long bone delayed unions and non-unions, as secondary objective of the EudraCT 2011-005441-13 clinical trial, through clinical and radiological bone consolidation at 3, 6 and 12 months of follow-up, with subgroup analysis of affected bone, gender, tobacco use, and time since the original fracture. Patients and methods: Twenty-eight patients were recruited and surgically treated with autologous bone marrow derived mesenchymal stromal cells expanded under Good Manufacturing Practices, combined to bioceramics in the surgical room before implantation. Mean age was 39 ± 13 years, 57% were males, and mean Body Mass Index 27 ± 7. Thirteen (46%) were active smokers. There were 11 femoral, 4 humeral, and 13 tibial non-unions. Initial fracture occurred at a mean ± SD of 27.9 ± 31.2 months before recruitment. Efficacy results were expressed by clinical consolidation (no or mild pain if values under 30 in R This paper is part of a Supplement supported by The Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Spanish Society (SECOT).

ORTHOUNION is a multicentre, open, comparative, three-arm, randomized clinical trial (EudraCT number 2015-000431-32) to compare the efficacy, at one and two years, of autologous human bone marrow-derived expanded mesenchymal stromal cell (hBM-MSC) treatments versus iliac crest autograft (ICA) to enhance bone healing in patients with diaphyseal and/or metaphysodiaphyseal fracture (femur, tibia, and humerus) status of atrophic or oligotrophic nonunion (more than 9 months after the acute fracture, including recalcitrant cases after failed treatments). The primary objective is to determine if the treatment with hBM-MSCs combined with biomaterial is superior to ICA in obtaining bone healing. If confirmed, a secondary objective is set to determine if the dose of 100 × 106 hBM-MSCs is noninferior to that of 200 × 106 hBM-MSCs. The participants (n = 108) will be randomly assigned to either the experimental low dose (n = 36), the experimental high dose (n = 36), or the comparator arm (n = 36) using a central randomization service. The trial will be conducted in 20 clinical centres in Spain, France, Germany, and Italy under the same clinical protocol. The confirmation of superiority for the proposed ATMP in nonunions may foster the future of bone regenerative medicine in this indication. On the contrary, absence of superiority may underline its limitations in clinical use.

Purpose: To clarify if blood loss and transfusion requirements can be decreased in revision knee surgery through a multimodal blood loss approach with tranexamic acid (TXA)Patients and Methods: A retrospective study was designed in 87 knees (79 patients) that received a knee revision between 2007 and 2013. To avoid heterogeneity in the surgical technique, only revisions with one single implant system were included. A treatment series of 44 knees that received TXA and other techniques in a multimodal blood loss protocol was compared to a control series of 43 knees that received neither TXA nor the rest of the multimodal blood loss protocol. No differences in the complexity of surgeries or case severity were detected.Results: A significant decrease was observed from 58% transfusion rate in the control group to 5% in the treated group. The postoperative haemoglobin drop was also significantly different. Although the use of a blood loss prevention approach including TXA was the most relevant factor in the transfusion risk (OR=15), longer surgical time also associated an increased risk of transfusion (OR=1.15).Conclusion: This study supports the use of a two-dose intravenous TXA under a multimodal blood loss prevention approach in revision knee replacement with significant reduction in the transfusion rate, postoperative blood loss and haemoglobin drop.

The available scores to clinically evaluate fracture consolidation encounter difficulties to interpret progression towards consolidation in long-bone non-union, particularly when incorporating biomaterials in the surgical treatment. The aims of this study were to validate the REBORNE bone healing scale in tibia, humerus and femur non-unions treated by a combination of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and biomaterials, through the interclass correlation (ICC) among raters, and to define reliability and concordance in anteroposterior and lateral radiographs, compared to computed tomography (CT). Methods: Twenty-six cases from the EudraCT 2011-005441-13 clinical trial underwent bone healing evaluation, if at least 3 out of 4 cortical views clearly identified. Three senior orthopaedic surgeons evaluated radiographs and CTs at 3 and 6 months FU. All cases included preoperative imaging and radiographs at 12 months. The 4-stage scale score was obtained from each cortical view in orthogonal radiographs or CTs. A score of 0.6875 (11/16) was set as a threshold for bone healing. Statistically, ICC evaluated agreement among raters. Cronbach's alpha coefficient tested reliability. Lin's concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) were estimated between mean CT scores and mean radiographic scores. Bland and Altman graphs provided the limits of agreement between both imaging techniques. Sensitivity and specificity were assessed in radiographs (against CT), and the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics

Background: Osteonecrosis (ON) of the femoral head represents a potentially severe disease of the hip where the lack of bone regeneration may lead to femoral head collapse and secondary osteoarthritis, with serious pain and disability. The aim of this European, multicentric clinical trial was to prove safety and early efficacy to heal early femoral head ON in patients through minimally invasive surgical implantation of autologous mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) expanded from bone marrow (BM) under good manufacturing practices (GMP). Methods: Twenty-two patients with femoral head ON (up to ARCO 2C) were recruited and surgically treated in France, Germany, Italy and Spain with BM-derived, expanded autologous MSC (total dose 140 million MSC in 7 mL). The investigational advanced therapy medicinal product (ATMP) was expanded from BM under the same protocol in all four countries and approved by each National Competent Authority. Patients were followed during two years for safety, based on adverse events, and for efficacy, based on clinical assessment (pain and hip score) and imaging (X-rays and MRIs). Patients were also reviewed after 5 to 6 years at latest follow-up for final outcome. Results: No severe adverse event was recalled as related to the ATMP. At 12 months, 16/20 per protocol and 16/22 under intention-to-treat (2 drop-out at 3 and 5 months) maintained head sphericity and showed bone regeneration. Of the 4 hips with ON progression, 3 required total hip replacement (THR). At 5 years, one patient (healed at 2 years visit) was not located, and 16/21 showed no progression or THR, 4/21 had received THR (all in the first year) and 1 had progressed one stage without THR. Conclusions: Expanded MSCs implantation was safe. Early efficacy was confirmed in 80% of cases under protocol at 2 years. At 5 years, the overall results were maintained and 19% converted to THR, all in the first year.