Introduction Adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL) is a T-cell neoplasm induced by human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1). In endemic areas, HTLV-1 infection typically occurs during breastfeeding but the median age of ATLL presentation in Japan is >70. Approximately 5% of ATLL patients in Japan present at age <50. Here, we hypothesized that ATLL in younger patients will have distinct genetic alterations. Methods DNA and RNA samples were extracted from frozen lymph nodes. Targeted capture sequencing for 98 genes and analysis of RNA sequencing (RNAseq) were performed in 8 samples of young patients with ATL (defined as ≤ 50 years in the current study) Results and discussion The most frequently mutated genes were CCR4 and CARD11, each in 3 of the analyzed cases (37.5%). Mutations of PLCG1, PRKCB and STAT3 were frequent in a previous genomic analysis (Kataoka et al. Nat Genet. 2015) that were not age-selected, but were not identified in our 8 cases. Three (37.5%) cases harbored concurrent CTLA4-CD28 and ICOS-CD28 fusions. This contrasts with previous reports, in which cases with both fusions were found in <1% of PTCL and ATLL patients. We confirmed the presence of both fusions in all 3 cases by RT-PCR. The structure of the CTLA4-CD28 fusion suggests that the extracellular portion of CTLA4 is expressed on the cell surface where it can interact with CD80 and CD86 to activate signaling through the intracellular CD28 portion. In contrast to CTLA4-CD28, the ICOS-CD28 fusion links the N-terminal signal peptide of ICOS with the extracellular and intracellular portions of CD28. This fusion should simply result in overexpression of CD28 and haploinsufficiency of ICOS. To evaluate the function of CTLA4-CD28, we used Ba/F3 cells, which are strictly dependent on exogenous IL-3 for proliferation. We transduced Ba/F3 cells with CTLA4-CD28 or a CTLA4-CD28 mutant (mut) with three amino acid substitutions that abrogate CD28 signaling. We then cultured these cells in the presence or absence of Raji cells, which express CD80 and CD86. In the absence of Raji cells, neither CTLA4-CD28 nor CTLA4-CD28mut expression conferred IL-3-independent growth. However, Ba/F3 cells expressing CTLA4-CD28 cultured in the presence of Raji cells achieved IL-3 independence. This was not the case for Ba/F3 cells expressing CTLA4-CD28mut, indicating a requirement on functional CTLA4-CD28 signaling. Western-blot analysis identified activation of CD28 signal in Ba/F3 cells with CTLA4-CD28 co-cultured with Raji cells. These data indicate that ligand-bound CTLA4-CD28 can promote downstream signaling in the absence of an endogenous TCR complex. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) comparing the 3 ATLL cases with CD28 fusions to the 5 cases that lacked fusions demonstrated enrichment of previously defined gene signatures associated with AKT and RAF signaling, both of which are downstream of CD28 activation. GSEA also identified enrichments of T-cell function-related signatures, including pathways involved in interferon responses, in cases with CD28 fusions Cases with CTLA4-CD28 and ICOS-CD28 fusions become haploinsufficient for CTLA4 and ICOS. As expected, these cases had lower expression of both genes by RNAseq. Interestingly, these cases also had higher expression of CD80. By immunohistochemistry, ATLL cells with CTLA4-CD28 and ICOS-CD28 fusions expressed CD80 and macrophages in the tumor microenvironment expressed CD86. Thus, both intra- and intercellular interactions could drive CTLA4-CD28 and ICOS-CD28 signaling in these cases. Treatment of Ba/F3 cells expressing CTLA4-CD28 and cultured in the presence of Raji cells with a CTLA4 blocking antibody suppressed proliferation in a dose-dependent fashion. A previous case report (Mol Genet Genomic Med, 2015) described a patient with Sezary Syndrome and CTLA4-CD28 fusion who had a deep but transient response to the anti-CTLA4 antibody ipilimumab. This study did not clarify the extent to which response resulted from blocking of cell-autonomous CTLA4-CD28 signaling versus activation of a cell non-autonomous immune response. Nonetheless, it strongly supports the testing of CTLA4 blockade in additional cases of T-cell malignancies, including ATLL, that harbor CTLA4-CD28 fusions. Disclosures Stevenson: Celgene: Research Funding. Ohshima:Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene Corp.: Honoraria, Research Funding; NEC Corp.: Research Funding; SRL, Inc.: Consultancy. Weinstock:Verastem Oncology: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding.
Recurrent chromosomal rearrangements are a hallmark of hematologic malignancies and play critical roles in pathogenesis. The TP53 analog TP63 is rearranged in 5-10% of diverse subtypes of both aggressive T- and B-cell lymphomas. Patients with TP63-rearranged lymphomas have dismal outcomes, with 5-year overall survival rates between 0-17%, depending on cohorts. The function and mechanisms of TP63 rearrangements and TP63 fusion proteins in tumorigenesis are poorly understood. As a result, attempts to treat these patients to date have been largely empiric. Thus, there is an urgent need to understand how TP63 fusions contribute to tumorigenesis and to translate the findings into novel therapeutic options for these patients. Here, we demonstrated that TP63 fusions are essential for the propagation of T-cell lymphomas (TCLs). Knockdown of TP63 fusions with specific shRNAs in TCL cell lines harboring TP63 fusions suppressed both cell growth in vitro and tumor growth in vivo. Retroviral expression of TBL1XR1-TP63, the most common TP63 fusion, conferred cytokine independence in Ba/F3 cells, consistent with its role as an oncogene. To investigate the role of TP63 fusions in T- and B-cell lymphomagenesis, we engineered a CAG-Loxp-Stop-Loxp-TBL1XR1-TP63 conditional knock-in mouse model and crossed with hCD2-Cre mice. This results in expression beginning during early lymphoid development. As observed in patients, transgenic mice developed multiple subtypes of both T- and B-cell lymphoma. To define the effects and mechanisms of TP63 fusions within T cells, we performed CRISPR scanning, transcriptomic, epigenomic, and proteomic analyses. Our data showed that domains within both the N-terminal TBL1XR1 and C-terminal TP63 portions contribute to the function of this fusion. We found that the N-terminal component of TP63 fusions interacts with components of the NCOR/SMRT complex. At the same time, the C-terminal portion of TP63 (which recapitulates the deltaN-p63 isoform expressed in some carcinomas) interacts with the enhancer modifier KMT2D and its complex members. TBL1XR1-TP63 binds to a novel distal enhancer to drive MYC expression, and thus upregulates the expression of the histone H3K27 methylase EZH2. Finally, we assessed whether EZH2 is a vulnerability of TP63-rearranged lymphomas. We found that knockdown of EZH2 in TP63-rearranged lines significantly impaired cell growth, as did treatment with the EZH2 and 1 dual inhibitor valemetostat. Valemetostat, which is now being tested in patients with lymphoma, counteracted the oncogenic effects of TP63 fusions in multiple preclinical models in vivo. Together, our results identify the TP63 fusion as a highly unique oncogenic driver in lymphomagenesis capable of recruiting multiple epigenetic modifier complexes and inducing a targetable dependence on EZH2. Citation Format: Gongwei Wu, Noriaki Yoshida, Jihe Liu, Xiaoyang Zhang, Yuan Xiong, Tayla Heavican-Foral, Huiyun Liu, Geoffrey Nelson, Lu Yang, Renee Chen, Katherine Donovan, Marcus Jones, Mikhail Roshal, Yanming Zhang, Ran Xu, Ajit Nirmal, Salvia Jain, Catharine Leahy, Kristen Jones, Kristen Stevenson, Natasha Galasso, Nivetha Ganesan, Tiffany Chang, Wen-Chao Wu, Abner Louissaint, Lydie Debaize, Hojong Yoon, Paola Dal Cin, Wing Chan Chan, Shannan Ho Sui Ho Sui, Samuel Ng, Andrew Feldman, Steven M. Horwitz, Mathew Meyerson, Karen Adelman, Eric Fischer, Chun-Wei Chen, David Weinstock, Myles Brown. TP63 fusions drive enhancer rewiring, lymphomagenesis, and dependence on EZH2. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 5755.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.