Where n = sample size, t = value of the normal distribution (Student t) for a 95% confidence level (t = 1.96), L = accepted error or precision (5%), and SD = weighted disease prevalence (%). With This technique, the number of animals determined for random sampling was 242; collected into identifed plastic bags; and observed at microscope.Results: 194 (80.16%) positive to ticks; and 211 (79.92%) positive to fleas Ctenocephalides spp.Conclusion: Is considerable number of positives animals and to continue in the present conditions, this problem can take importance in the society, because frequently these dogs are on different points from the town and can pass the infection of other healthy animals, visitors and even the same family.
Background and Aims: At the population level, genetic diversity is a key determinant of a tree species’ capacity to cope with stress. However, little is known about the relative importance of the different components of genetic diversity for tree stress responses. We compared how two sources of genetic diversity, genotype and cytotype (i.e. differences in ploidy levels) influence growth, phytochemical, and physiological traits of Populus tremuloides in the presence and absence of environmental stress. Methods: In a series of field studies, we first assessed variation in traits across diploid and triploid aspen genotypes from Utah and Wisconsin under nonstressed conditions. In two follow-up experiments, we exposed diploid and triploid aspen genotypes from Wisconsin to individual and interactive drought stress and defoliation treatments and quantified trait variations under stress. Key Results: We found that 1) tree growth and associated traits did not differ significantly between ploidy levels under nonstressed conditions. Instead, variation in tree growth and most other traits was driven by genotypic and population differences. 2) Genotypic differences were critical for explaining variation of most of functional traits and their responses to stress. 3) Ploidy level played a subtle role in shaping traits and trait stress responses, as its influence was typically obscured by genotypic differences. 4) As an exception to the third conclusion, we showed that triploid trees expressed minimally higher levels of foliar defenses, photosynthesis, and rubisco activity under well-watered conditions, and displayed slightly greater drought resilience than diploids. Conclusion: Although ploidy level can strongly influence the ecology of tree species, those effects may be relatively small in contrast to the effects of genotypic variation in highly diverse species.
With advancing climate change, tree survival increasingly depends on mechanisms that facilitate coping with multiple environmental stressors. At the population level, genetic diversity is a key determinant of a tree species’ capacity to deal with stress. However, little is known about the relative relevance of the different components of genetic diversity for shaping tree stress responses. We compared how two components of genetic diversity, genotypic variation and ploidy level, shape growth, phytochemical, and physiological traits of Populus tremuloides, under environmental stress. In two field experiments we exposed eight diploid and eight triploid aspen genotypes to individual and interactive drought stress and defoliation treatments. We found that: 1) Genotypic differences were critical for explaining variation of most of functional traits and their responses to stress. 2) Ploidy levels generally played a subordinate role for shaping traits, as they were typically obscured by genotypic differences. 3) As an exception to the second finding, we found that triploid trees expressed higher levels of foliar defenses, photosynthesis, and rubisco activity under well-watered conditions, and displayed greater drought resilience than diploids. This research demonstrates that the simultaneous study of multiple sources of genetic diversity is important for understanding how trees will respond to environmental change.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.