Metabolomic discovery of biomarkers of type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk may reveal etiological pathways and help to identify individuals at risk for disease. We prospectively investigated the association between serum metabolites measured by targeted metabolomics and risk of T2D in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Potsdam (27,548 adults) among all incident cases of T2D (n = 800, mean follow-up 7 years) and a randomly drawn subcohort (n = 2,282). Flow injection analysis tandem mass spectrometry was used to quantify 163 metabolites, including acylcarnitines, amino acids, hexose, and phospholipids, in baseline serum samples. Serum hexose; phenylalanine; and diacyl-phosphatidylcholines C32:1, C36:1, C38:3, and C40:5 were independently associated with increased risk of T2D and serum glycine; sphingomyelin C16:1; acyl-alkyl-phosphatidylcholines C34:3, C40:6, C42:5, C44:4, and C44:5; and lysophosphatidylcholine C18:2 with decreased risk. Variance of the metabolites was largely explained by two metabolite factors with opposing risk associations (factor 1 relative risk in extreme quintiles 0.31 [95% CI 0.21–0.44], factor 2 3.82 [2.64–5.52]). The metabolites significantly improved T2D prediction compared with established risk factors. They were further linked to insulin sensitivity and secretion in the Tübingen Family study and were partly replicated in the independent KORA (Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg) cohort. The data indicate that metabolic alterations, including sugar metabolites, amino acids, and choline-containing phospholipids, are associated early on with a higher risk of T2D.
Background: Obesity represents a risk factor for insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and atherosclerosis. In addition, for any given amount of total body fat, an excess of visceral fat or fat accumulation in the liver and skeletal muscle augments the risk. Conversely, even in obesity, a metabolically benign fat distribution phenotype may exist.Methods: In 314 subjects, we measured total body, visceral, and subcutaneous fat with magnetic resonance (MR) tomography and fat in the liver and skeletal muscle with proton MR spectroscopy. Insulin sensitivity was estimated from oral glucose tolerance test results. Subjects were divided into 4 groups: normal weight (body mass index [BMI] [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared], Ͻ25.0), overweight (BMI, 25.0-29.9), obese-insulin sensitive (IS) (BMI, Ն30.0 and placement in the upper quartile of insulin sensitivity), and obese-insulin resistant (IR) (BMI, Ն30.0 and placement in the lower 3 quartiles of insulin sensitivity).Results: Total body and visceral fat were higher in the overweight and obese groups compared with the normal-weight group (PϽ.05); however, no differences were observed between the obese groups. In contrast, ectopic fat in skeletal muscle (PϽ.001) and particularly the liver (4.3%±0.6% vs 9.5%±0.8%) and the intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery (0.54±0.02 vs 0.59±0.01 mm) were lower and insulin sensitivity was higher (17.4±0.9 vs 7.3±0.3 arbitrary units) in the obese-IS vs the obese-IR group (PϽ.05). Unexpectedly, the obese-IS group had almost identical insulin sensitivity and the intima-media thickness was not statistically different compared with the normal-weight group (18.2±0.9 AU and 0.51±0.02 mm, respectively). Conclusions:A metabolically benign obesity that is not accompanied by insulin resistance and early atherosclerosis exists in humans. Furthermore, ectopic fat in the liver may be more important than visceral fat in the determination of such a beneficial phenotype in obesity.
and acute insulin response (AIR) (25-g intravenous glucose challenge). Sixty-three subjects developed diabetes over an average follow-up of 6.9 ؎ 4.9 years. In 224 subjects, who remained nondiabetic, follow-up measurements of M and AIR were available. At baseline, ALT, AST, and GGT were related to percent body fat (r ؍ 0.16, 0.17, and 0.11, respectively), M (r ؍ ؊0.32, ؊0.28, and ؊0.24), and HGO (r ؍ 0.27, 0.12, and 0.14; all P < 0.01). In a proportional hazard analysis with adjustment for age, sex, body fat, M, and AIR, higher ALT [relative hazard 90th vs. 10th centiles (95% CI): 1.9 (1.1-3.3), P ؍ 0.02], but not AST or GGT, predicted diabetes. Elevated ALT at baseline was associated prospectively with an increase in HGO (r ؍ 0.21, P ؍ 0.001) but not with changes in M or AIR (both P ؍ 0.1). Higher ALT concentrations were cross-sectionally associated with obesity and whole-body and hepatic insulin resistance and prospectively associated with a decline in hepatic insulin sensitivity and the development of type 2 diabetes. Our findings indicate that high ALT is a marker of risk for type 2 diabetes and suggest a potential role of the liver in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes.
OBJECTIVE -The ␣ 2 -Heremans-Schmid glycoprotein (AHSG; fetuin-A in animals) impairs insulin signaling in vitro and in rodents. Whether AHSG is associated with insulin resistance in humans is under investigation. In an animal model of diet-induced obesity that is commonly associated with hepatic steatosis, an increase in Ahsg mRNA expression was observed in the liver. Therefore, we hypothesized that the AHSG plasma protein, which is exclusively secreted by the liver in humans, may not only be associated with insulin resistance but also with fat accumulation in the liver.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS -Data from 106 healthy Caucasians without type 2 diabetes were included in cross-sectional analyses. A subgroup of 47 individuals had data from a longitudinal study. Insulin sensitivity was measured by a euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp, and liver fat was determined by 1 H magnetic resonance spectroscopy.RESULTS -AHSG plasma levels, adjusted for age, sex, and percentage of body fat, were higher in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance compared with subjects with normal glucose tolerance (P ϭ 0.006). AHSG plasma levels were negatively associated with insulin sensitivity (r ϭ Ϫ0.22, P ϭ 0.03) in cross-sectional analyses. Moreover, they were positively associated with liver fat (r ϭ 0.27, P ϭ 0.01). In longitudinal analyses, under weight loss, a decrease in liver fat was accompanied by a decrease in AHSG plasma concentrations. Furthermore, high AHSG levels at baseline predicted less increase in insulin sensitivity (P ϭ 0.02).CONCLUSIONS -We found that high AHSG plasma levels are associated with insulin resistance in humans. Moreover, AHSG plasma levels are elevated in subjects with fat accumulation in the liver. This is consistent with a potential role of AHSG as a link between fatty liver and insulin resistance. Diabetes Care 29:853-857, 2006I nsulin resistance plays a crucial role in the development of type 2 diabetes (1). Multiple mechanisms are thought to be involved in its pathogenesis. Among them, the human ␣ 2 -Heremans-Schmid glycoprotein (AHSG) was found to be important in animals and in in vitro studies. It is an abundant serum protein in mammals. Bovine and murine fetuin-A and pp63 in rats are homologues of AHSG (2,3). In humans, except for the tongue and the placenta, it is exclusively expressed in the liver (4). It is a natural inhibitor of the insulin-stimulated insulin receptor tyrosine kinase (3). Acute injection of human recombinant AHSG inhibi t e d i n s u l i n -s t i m u l a t e d t y r o s i n e phosphorylation of the insulin receptor and insulin receptor substrate-1 in rat liver and skeletal muscle (3). In addition, AHSG knockout mice display improved insulin sensitivity and are resistant to weight gain on a high-fat diet (5).While these data reflect that AHSG is an important candidate among the factors that induce insulin resistance, the role of this protein in the natural history of type 2 diabetes is still unclear (6). Recent reports from genetic studies suggest that single nucleotide polymor...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.