Background: Concurrent bleeding or existing clots usually obscure the vision field and decrease the success rate of hysteroscopy. Therefore, any efforts made in order to have a clear view during the hysteroscopy will improve the diagnostic or treatment outcomes. We examined the effect of preoperative clot evacuation on hysteroscopy and patient outcomes. Methods: In this parallel-group trial, 114 patients with uterine bleeding were randomly assigned to receive either clot evacuation before standard operative hysteroscopy or standard hysteroscopy alone. The investigated endpoints were the clarity of vision, amount of bleeding, the volume of distension media, duration of the procedure, and postoperative complications. Results: All 114 participants completed the study. There were statistically significant differences in the frequency of the clear vision (p<.001), the severity of bleeding (p=.0006), mean procedure time (p<.001), mean serum volume used (p<.001), and the postoperative hematocrit levels (p<.001) between groups, in favor of women with preprocedural intrauterine evacuation. There was no difference related to in-hospital stay (p=0.081) and anesthetic complications among the patients (p=0.182). The procedure was successfully performed on all patients of both groups with zero postoperative complications. Conclusion: Removal of clots and other uterine contents before the insertion of the hysteroscope rendered better and faster access to the uterine wall to observe existing abnormalities. This additional surgical step could take a significant impact on surgical and clinical outcomes. Trial registration: Clinical trial registry name: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials Url: https://en.irct.ir/trial/33369 The registration number: IRCT20101130005283N13 Date of trial registration: 2018-11-16
Background: Concurrent bleeding or existing clots usually obscure the vision field and decrease the hysteroscopy success rate. Therefore, any efforts made to have a clear view during the hysteroscopy will improve the diagnostic or treatment outcomes. In this study, we examined the effect of preoperative clot evacuation on hysteroscopy and patient outcomes.Methods: In this parallel-group clinical trial conducted from December 2018 to September 2019 at the Oncology Center of Alzahra Teaching Hospital in Tabriz, Iran, 114 patients with uterine bleeding were randomly assigned to receive either clot evacuation before standard operative hysteroscopy or standard hysteroscopy alone. The investigated endpoints were the clarity of vision, the volume of used distension media, duration of the procedure, amount of bleeding, and postoperative complications.Results: All 114 participants completed the study. There were statistically significant differences in the frequency of the clear vision (p<.001), the severity of bleeding (p=.0006), mean serum volume used (p<.001), mean procedure time (p<.001), and the postoperative hematocrit levels (p<.001) between groups, in favor of women with preprocedural intrauterine evacuation. There was no difference in in-hospital stay (p=0.081) and anesthetic complications among the patients (p=0.182). The procedure was successfully performed on all patients of both groups with zero postoperative complications.Conclusion: Removal of clots and other uterine contents before inserting hysteroscope rendered better and faster access to the uterine wall to observe existing abnormalities and reduce the hysteroscopy time. This additional surgical step could take a significant impact on surgical and clinical outcomes.Trial registration: Clinical trial registry name: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials URL: https://en.irct.ir/trial/33369 The registration number: IRCT20101130005283N13 Date of trial registration: 2018-11-16
BackgroundConcurrent bleeding or existing clots usually obscure the vision field and decrease the success rate in hysteroscopy. Therefore, any effort to have a clear view during the hysteroscopy will meliorate the diagnostic or treatment outcomes. We examined the effect of preoperative clot evacuation on hysteroscopy and patient outcomes.MethodsIn this parallel-group trial, 114 patients with uterine bleeding were randomly assigned to receive either clot evacuation before standard operative hysteroscopy or standard hysteroscopy alone. The primary endpoints were the clarity of vision, amount of bleeding, the volume of consumed media, duration of the procedure, and postoperative complications.ResultsAll 114 participants completed the study. There were statistically significant differences in the frequency of the clear vision (p < 0.001), the severity of bleeding (p = 0.0006), mean procedure time (p < 0.001), mean serum volume used (p < 0.001), and the postoperative hematocrit levels [95% CI (-3.00, -1.88)] (p < 0.001) between groups. There was no difference related to in-hospital stay (p = 0.081) and anesthetic complications among the patients (p = 0.182). The procedure was successfully performed on all patients of both groups with zero postoperative complications.ConclusionRemoval of clots and other uterine contents before the insertion of the hysteroscope rendered better and faster access to the uterine wall to observe existing abnormalities. This method of starting the hysteroscopy procedure has a significant impact on surgical outcomes.Trial registration: Clinical trial registry name: Iranian Registry of Clinical TrialsUrl: https://en.irct.ir/trial/33369The registration number: IRCT20101130005283N13Date of registration: 2018-11-16
Objectives: Concurrent bleeding or existing clots usually obscure the vision field and decrease the hysteroscopy success rate. Therefore, any efforts made to have a clear view during the hysteroscopy will improve the diagnostic or treatment outcomes. We examined the effect of preoperative clot evacuation on hysteroscopy related outcomes. Materials and Methods: In this parallel-group randomized clinical trial conducted in Al-Zahra hospital, Tabriz, Iran, 114 women with uterine bleeding were randomly assigned to receive either clot evacuation before standard operative hysteroscopy or after that from December 2018 to September 2019. The study outcomes were the clarity of vision, amount of bleeding, the volume of required distension media, duration of the procedure, and postoperative complications. Results: There were statistically significant differences in the frequency of the clear vision (P<0.001), the severity of bleeding, mean procedure time (P<0.001), mean used distension media and the mean postoperative hematocrit levels in favour of women with pre-hysteroscopy intrauterine evacuation. There was no difference in in-hospital stay and anaesthetic complications among the two groups. The procedure was successfully performed on all participants of both groups with no post-operative complications. Conclusions: Removal of clots and other uterine contents before the insertion of the hysteroscope rendered better and faster access to the uterine wall to observe existing abnormalities. This additional surgical step could significantly impact surgical and clinical outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.