Accurate disease definitions are essential for clinical decisionmaking, trial enrolment, and mechanistic research. Since it was first recognized over four decades ago multiple attempts have been made to adequately define the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, up to half of the patients captured by definitions to date do not have the disease. This poor diagnostic accuracy may, in part, explain how over 200 randomized control trials have, with the exception of a low tidal volume ventilation strategy, failed to identify any mortality-reducing therapies. The recently published Berlin definition of ARDS was introduced to address the poor accuracy and shortcomings associated with previous models; however, a recent validation study found the diagnostic reliability of the Berlin definition to be no superior to its predecessor. In the absence of accurate, objectively validated criteria for diagnosing this condition, clinical trials will continue to include large numbers of patients without the disease.ARDS is a non-pneumonic, non-cardiogenic condition characterized by increased vascular permeability, pulmonary oedema, and severe arterial hypoxaemia-a clinical triad found in many critically ill patients. It is precipitated by both direct and indirect causes, resulting in a variable clinical pattern of presentation and progression. ARDS is frequently associated with other organ failures, resulting in both pulmonary and extra-pulmonary factors influencing mortality. Unlike most medical conditions, this complex syndrome does not yet benefit from an accessible in vivo reference standard (e.g. diagnosis of pulmonary embolism), or the existence of clear biomarkers (e.g. acute coronary syndrome). As a result, separating true 'lung injury' from other conditions, such as heart failure or pneumonia, which display similar clinical signs, is challenging.Although the reference standard has so far remained constant, lack of clarity about the clinical definition of ARDS has been problematic. Since 1967, when Ashbaugh and Petty first described the syndrome, there have been attempts to refine its definition. 1 Initially, Murray proposed a definition comprising four variables-chest X-ray (CXR) findings, Pa O 2 /FI O 2 ratio, positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), and respiratory compliance. 2 The resultant lung injury score (LIS) predicts the need for prolonged mechanical ventilation and has good sensitivity and specificity (0.74 and 0.77, respectively) as a predictor of diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) at autopsy. 3 4 Despite this, the LIS has not entered routine practice, and a more pragmatic approach that targets ease of use has prevailed.In 1994, the American-European Consensus Conference (AECC) redefined ARDS using criteria based on hypoxaemia, CXR infiltrates, and absence of left atrial hypertension; abnormal lung mechanics were dropped as a criterion. The AECC authors also urged diagnostic caution 'in order to minimize the chance of including non-ARDS-related illnesses'. 3 Their criteria are accessible, were adopted ...