No abstract

Immunotherapy is a very promising therapeutic approach against cancer that is particularly effective when combined with gene therapy. Immuno-gene therapy approaches have led to the approval of four advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) for the treatment of p53-deficient tumors (Gendicine and Imlygic), refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Kymriah) and large B-cell lymphomas (Yescarta). In spite of these remarkable successes, immunotherapy is still associated with severe side effects for CD19+ malignancies and is inefficient for solid tumors. Controlling transgene expression through an externally administered inductor is envisioned as a potent strategy to improve safety and efficacy of immunotherapy. The aim is to develop smart immunogene therapy-based-ATMPs, which can be controlled by the addition of innocuous drugs or agents, allowing the clinicians to manage the intensity and durability of the therapy. In the present manuscript, we will review the different inducible, versatile and externally controlled gene delivery systems that have been developed and their applications to the field of immunotherapy. We will highlight the advantages and disadvantages of each system and their potential applications in clinics.

Over recent decades, gene therapy, which has enabled the treatment of several incurable diseases, has undergone a veritable revolution. Cell therapy has also seen major advances in the treatment of various diseases, particularly through the use of adult stem cells (ASCs). The combination of gene and cell therapy (GCT) has opened up new opportunities to improve advanced therapy medicinal products for the treatment of several diseases. Despite the considerable potential of GCT, the use of retroviral vectors has major limitations with regard to oncogene transactivation and the lack of physiological expression. Recently, gene therapists have focused on genome editing (GE) technologies as an alternative strategy. In this review, we discuss the potential benefits of using GE technologies to improve GCT approaches based on ASCs. We will begin with a brief summary of different GE platforms and techniques and will then focus on key therapeutic approaches that have been successfully used to treat diseases in animal models. Finally, we discuss whether ASC GE could become a real alternative to retroviral vectors in a GCT setting.

Genome editing technologies not only provide unprecedented opportunities to study basic cellular system functionality but also improve the outcomes of several clinical applications. In this review, we analyze various gene editing techniques used to finetune immune systems from a basic research and clinical perspective. We discuss recent advances in the development of programmable nucleases, such as zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-Cas-associated nucleases. We also discuss the use of programmable nucleases and their derivative reagents such as base editing tools to engineer immune cells via gene disruption, insertion, and rewriting of T cells and other immune components, such natural killers (NKs) and hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs). In addition, with regard to chimeric antigen receptors (CARs), we describe how different gene editing tools enable healthy donor cells to be used in CAR T therapy instead of autologous cells without risking graft-versus-host disease or rejection, leading to reduced adoptive cell therapy costs and instant treatment availability for patients. We pay particular attention to the delivery of therapeutic transgenes, such as CARs, to endogenous loci which prevents collateral damage and increases therapeutic effectiveness. Finally, we review creative innovations, including immune system repurposing, that facilitate safe and efficient genome surgery within the framework of clinical cancer immunotherapies.

BackgroundChimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells directed against CD19 have achieved impressive outcomes for the treatment of relapsed/refractory B lineage lymphoid neoplasms. However, CAR-T therapy still has important limitations due to severe side effects and the lack of efficiency in 40-50% of the patients. Most CARs-T products are generated using retroviral vectors with strong promoters. However, high CAR expression levels can lead to tonic signalling, premature exhaustion and over-stimulation of CAR-T cells, reducing efficacy and increasing side effects. TCR-like expression of the CAR through genome editing resulted in enhanced anti-tumour potency, reducing tonic signalling and improving CAR-T phenotype. In this manuscript, we searched for LVs that mimic the TCR expression pattern as a closer-to-clinic alternative for the generation of improved CAR-T cells.MethodsDifferent LVs containing viral and human promoters were analysed to select those that closely mimic a TCR-like kinetic profile upon T-cell activation. WAS gene proximal promoter-driven LVs (AW-LVs) were selected to express a second generation 4-1BB aCD19 CAR (ARI-0001) into T cells to generate AWARI CAR-T cells. TCR-like AWARI and EF1α-driven ARI CAR T cells were analysed for in vitro and in vivo killing efficiency using leukaemia and lymphoma cellular models. Tonic signalling, exhaustion markers and phenotype were determined by flow cytometry. Large-scale automated manufacturing of AWARI CAR-T cells was performed in a CliniMACs Prodigy bioreactor.ResultsOur data showed that LVs expressing the transgene through the WAS gene proximal promoter mimic very closely the TCR (CD3) expression pattern kinetic upon TCR stimulation or antigen encounter. Compared to EF1α-driven ARI CAR-T cells, AWARI CAR-T cells exhibited a higher proportion of naïve/stem cell memory T cells with less exhausted phenotype after efficient killing of CD19+ cells both in vitro and in vivo. AWARI CAR-T cells also showed lower tonic signalling and reduced secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and were efficiently manufactured in large-scale GMP-like conditions.ConclusionsWAS-gene-promoter driven LVs can be used to generate physiological 4-1BB-CAR-T cell products with lower tonic signalling, improved phenotype and a safer profile. We propose the use of TCR-like LVs as an alternative to strong-promoter driven LVs for the generation of CAR-T products.

No abstract

No abstract

Autologous T cells expressing the Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) have been approved as advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) against several hematological malignancies. However, the generation of patient-specific CAR-T products delays treatment and precludes standardization. Allogeneic off-the-shelf CAR-T cells are an alternative to simplify this complex and time-consuming process. Here we investigated safety and efficacy of knocking out the TCR molecule in ARI-0001 CAR-T cells, a second generation αCD19 CAR approved by the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS) under the Hospital Exemption for treatment of patients older than 25 years with Relapsed/Refractory acute B cell lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). We first analyzed the efficacy and safety issues that arise during disruption of the TCR gene using CRISPR/Cas9. We have shown that edition of TRAC locus in T cells using CRISPR as ribonuleorproteins allows a highly efficient TCR disruption (over 80%) without significant alterations on T cells phenotype and with an increased percentage of energetic mitochondria. However, we also found that efficient TCRKO can lead to on-target large and medium size deletions, indicating a potential safety risk of this procedure that needs monitoring. Importantly, TCR edition of ARI-0001 efficiently prevented allogeneic responses and did not detectably alter their phenotype, while maintaining a similar anti-tumor activity ex vivo and in vivo compared to unedited ARI-0001 CAR-T cells. In summary, we showed here that, although there are still some risks of genotoxicity due to genome editing, disruption of the TCR is a feasible strategy for the generation of functional allogeneic ARI-0001 CAR-T cells. We propose to further validate this protocol for the treatment of patients that do not fit the requirements for standard autologous CAR-T cells administration.