The etiologic factors associated with crestal bone loss have not been comprehensively clarified. Several theories exist as to the reason for the observed changes in crestal bone height following implant restoration. In the 1990s, the wide-diameter implants were commercially introduced. Initially, the implants were restored with standard-diameter abutments because of lack of matching prosthetic components. Long-term radiographic follow-up of these 'platform-switched' restored wide-diameter dental implants has demonstrated a smaller-than-expected vertical change in the crestal bone height around these implants that is typically observed around implants restored conventionally with prosthetic components of matching diameters. The aim of this randomised controlled study was to assess radiographically marginal bone level alterations in implants restored according to the platform-switching concept compared with traditionally restored implants. Fifty-four subjects to participate in this randomised controlled study were selected. Two groups were assigned at random: control group (56 implants were restored with standard matching-diameter abutments) and test group (58 implants were restored with medialised abutments). X-ray explorations were taken for peri-implant bone level at the minute the last cementing of the prosthesis and at 1-year follow-up. NHI Image was used to digitally process and manipulate the radiographic images and perform the measurements. Mean of bone loss with platform-switching implants was -0·01 mm, and the mean of bone loss with standard platform implant was 0·42 mm. Outcomes of this study indicated that the platform-switching design could preserve the crestal bone levels to 1-year follow-up. There was a statistically significant difference in marginal bone loss.

The aim of this report is two-fold. First it analyses the precision of a modification of the parallel technique that can be used in those cases with anatomical limitations. Second, it checks the influence of the reference points' definition of objects to be measured by using both the original and the modified radiographic techniques. 2 intraoral radiographs were taken of 28 implants with 2 different methods: a standard paralleling technique and a modified technique that used a smaller film and a silicone spacer to ensure parallelism. Measurements of peri-implant bone levels and implant width were made in triplicate on digitized film radiographs. The results of the peri-implant bone levels were that with the parallel method the mean was 0.44 mm and the precision was 0.43 mm, and with the modified method the mean was 0.73 mm and the precision was 0.66 mm. In addition to the correct localization of the point of reference in this study, the precision with the parallel method was 0.08 mm and with the modified method was 0.13 mm. Although it was greater with the gold standard technique than with the modified technique, precision was very high for both methods and accurate enough for clinical use.

This study was designed to characterize the distance of the contact glide in the closing masticatory stroke in healthy adult subjects, during chewing of three types of food (crustless bread, chewing gum and peanuts). Mandibular movements (masticatory movements and laterality movements with dental contact) were registered using a gnathograph (MK-6I Diagnostic System) on the right and left side during unilateral chewing of the three food types. Length of dental contact was measured in masticatory cycle, which is defined as where the terminal part of the chewing cycles could be superimposed on the pathways taken by the mandible during lateral excursions with occlusal contacts. The length of dental contact during mastication of chewing gum is 1.46 +/- 1 mm, during chewing of soft bread is 1.38 +/- 0.7 mm and during chewing of peanuts is 1.45 +/- 0.9 mm. There is no significant difference in the lengths of dental contact during mastication of three types of foods that enable direct tooth gliding.

Rehabilitation with implants is a challenge. Having previous evaluation criteria is key to establishing the best treatment for the patient. In addition to clinical and radiological aspects, the prosthetic parameters must be taken into account in the initial workup, since they allow discrimination between fixed and removable rehabilitation. We present a study protocol that analyzes three basic prosthetic aspects. First, denture space defines the need to replace teeth, tissue, or both. Second, lip support focuses on whether or not to include a flange. Third, the smile line warns of potential risks in esthetic rehabilitation. Combining these parameters allows us to make a decision as to the most suitable type of prosthesis. The proposed protocol is useful for assessing the prosthetic parameters that influence decision making as to the best-suited type of restoration. From this point of view, we think it is appropriate for the initial approach to the patient. In any case, other considerations of study may amend the proposal.

No abstract