<b><i>Background:</i></b> Low skeletal muscle mass is significantly associated with severe adverse events (AEs) from chemotherapy, and low tolerability leads to decreased survival. We aimed to investigate whether body skeletal muscle mass is correlated with tolerability and prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with lenvatinib. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This multicenter, retrospective study was conducted at five locations in Japan. We included 100 patients with HCC treated with lenvatinib. Skeletal muscle mass was measured by computed tomography and normalized for height in m² as skeletal muscle index (SMI). The assessment criteria for low SMI were taken from the sarcopenia criteria of the Japan Society of Hepatology. We investigated the influence of low SMI on drug withdrawal due to severe AEs in the first 2 months and on time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS). <b><i>Results:</i></b> The numbers of high- and low-SMI patients were 41 and 59, respectively. Those with severe AEs leading to withdraw in the high- and low-SMI groups were 7 and 23, respectively. The low-SMI group had a higher withdrawal rate than the high-SMI group (<i>p</i> = 0.042). The median TTF in the low- and high-SMI groups was 139 and 230 days, respectively. The median OS in the low- and high-SMI groups was 264 and 353 days, respectively. Patients in the low-SMI group experienced significantly worse OS and TTF than those in the high-SMI group (log-rank test for trend: TTF, <i>p</i> = 0.010; OS, <i>p</i> = 0.021). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Decreased skeletal muscle mass is associated with the occurrence of severe AEs and worse TTF and OS. Skeletal muscle mass can be used as a predictive marker for tolerability and prognosis to lenvatinib in patients with HCC.

Based on these data, we developed a simple scoring system to predict HCC development using these three factors. Using these scores, patients were classified into four groups; cumulative incidence of HCC development significantly increased with increasing scores (p < 0.001). Conclusions

Aim:The presence of resistance-associated variants (RAV) may attenuate the efficacy of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) in combination therapy for hepatitis C. The aim of this study was to characterize the NS3 and NS5A regions of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in naturally occurring RAV. Methods:The NS3 and NS5A regions of HCV were amplified by nested polymerase chain reaction and their nucleotide sequences were determined by direct sequencing in 493 genotype 1b patients naive to DAA-based therapies. The effect of baseline RAV on response to pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy was analyzed in 65 patients after stratification by interleukin (IL)-28B genotype.Results: The incidence of RAV was 7.9% in NS3 (V36I/L, 1.2%; T54S, 2.8%; Q80K/R, 3.0%; A156S, 0.2%; and D168E/T, 2.4%) and 20.2% in NS5A (L31I/M, 2.2%; and Y93H, 19.0%). The incidence in interferon experienced and naive patients was similar. The incidence of Y93H in NS5A was significantly higher in the IL-28B TT genotype (rs8099917) than non-TT (27.1% vs 9.5%, P < 0.001). The virological response to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin therapy was not affected by the presence of RAV in IL-28B TT genotype.Conclusion: RAV, especially Y93H in the NS5A region, were highly prevalent in DAA naive patients with genotype 1b HCV in Japan and were linked to IL-28B TT genotype. Interferonbased therapy could be an alternative for patients with RAV because these variants did not attenuate the response to that therapy. The analysis of RAV may impact the selection of the optimal treatment strategy.

No abstract

Purpose To assess the safety, efficacy and prognostic impact of clinical factors related to lenvatinib treatment in Child-Pugh class A (CP-A) and class B (CP-B) patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC). Methods Patients with u-HCC who were treated with lenvatinib at multiple centers in Japan were retrospectively analyzed for treatment outcomes according to their respective CP status. Radiological objective response (OR) was assessed using modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) guidelines. Results Baseline demographic parameters were comparable between 126 (69.6%) patients with CP-A disease and 55 patients (30.4%) with CP-B disease. Frequency of lenvatinib-related adverse events, including decreased appetite (P=0.034), diarrhea (P=0.040), elevated serum bilirubin (P=0.016) and vomiting (P=0.009), were higher in CP-B than in CP-A patients. Relative dose intensity (RDI) was significantly higher in CP-A (0.69) than CP-B patients (0.50, P <0.001). Furthermore, OR rate (44.0%) was markedly higher in CP-A5 patients as compared to CP-A6 (25.5%), CP-B7 (22.2%), and CP-B8 patients (5.3%), respectively (P=0.002). In multivariable analysis, performance status (0 vs 1, 2, P=0.026), CP class (A vs B, P=0.045) and RDI (≥0.7 vs <0.7, P=0.034) were identified as factors associated with response to lenvatinib treatment. Overall survival (OS) at 12 months was significantly different between CP-A (66.3%) and CP-B patients (30.0%, P=0.002), and between CP 5–7 (59.2%) and CP 8 patients (34.8%, P=0.003). In multivariable analysis, CP class (A vs B, P=0.007) and Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stage (B vs C, P=0.002) were associated with OS following lenvatinib treatment. Conclusion Lenvatinib treatment offers significant benefits in patients with good liver function in real-world practice. The various characteristics identified in this study might be helpful as clinical predictors of response to lenvatinib and survival in clinical practice. Further studies are required to address eligibility for lenvatinib treatment in CP 7 patients.