Arteriovenous fistula puncture pain is a serious problem for patients undergoing dialysis and a good indication for topical anesthetics. No previous study has compared lidocaine/prilocaine cream (EMLA) with lidocaine tape for pain relief during arteriovenous fistula puncture in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. To this end, we conducted a multicenter randomized crossover study including 66 patients (mean age, 65.8 years; males, 57.6%) undergoing maintenance hemodialysis thrice/week. Subjects were assigned to Sequence EL (EMLA administration followed by lidocaine, with 1-week wash-out) or Sequence LE (reverse administration, first lidocaine then EMLA). All subjects completed the study. At each puncture site, 1 g EMLA (25 mg lidocaine + 25 mg prilocaine) or one sheet of lidocaine tape (18 mg lidocaine) was applied 1 h or 30 min prior to arteriovenous fistula puncture, respectively. The primary endpoint was puncture pain relief, which was measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale. The secondary endpoints included quality of life, which was measured by SF-36, and safety. EMLA produced a 10.1-mm greater visual analog scale improvement than lidocaine tape (P = 0.00001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the quality of life between the two groups, and no significant carryover/period effect was observed in any analysis. Further, no drug-related adverse events were observed. Taken together, these results suggest that EMLA cream is superior to lidocaine tape for the relief of arteriovenous fistula puncture pain in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.
BackgroundCardiovascular disease (CVD) due to atherosclerosis is a major cause of death in renal allograft recipients. Recently, C1q/TNF-α related protein-9 (CTRP9), which is a paralog of adiponectin (ADPN), has been suggested to be related to the prevention of atherosclerosis and the occurrence of CVD, but this relationship has not been confirmed in renal allograft recipients.
BackgroundAdiponectin (ADPN) prevents the development/recurrence of cardiovascular events via its anti-atherogenic effects. However, few long-term studies have examined the changes in serum ADPN levels and arterial calcification seen in renal allograft recipients.Subjects and methodsThe effects of the serum ADPN level on arterial calcification were examined in 51 Japanese renal allograft recipients. Abdominal aorta calcification was evaluated on computed tomography using the aortic calcification area index (ACAI). The change in the ACAI and serum high-molecular-weight (HMW)—ADPN fractions were studied over an 8-year period. The arterial expression of ADPN, ADPN receptors (AdipoR)1 and 2, and T-cadherin (cadherin-13) were also examined by immunohistochemistry.ResultsThe change in the ACAI were grouped into quartiles and compared with the alterations in the serum levels of each ADPN fraction over an 8-year period. The change in the ACAI was much lower in the patients with highly elevated HMW-ADPN levels.Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that an advanced age at transplant and a history of cardiovascular complications were associated with an increased change in the ACAI, while higher HMW-ADPN concentrations were associated with improvements in the ACAI. Serum HDL-C level was also identified as a positive factor to increase serum HMW-ADPN level.In immunohistochemical examinations, ADPN was detected on CD31-positive arterial endothelial cells from renal allograft biopsy samples. ADPN co-localized with T-cadherin and AdipoR1, but only partially co-localized with AdipoR2.ConclusionBoth HMW-ADPN and HDL-C might inhibit the progression of vascular calcification by promoting ADPN binding to vascular endothelial cells via T-cadherin and AdipoR in Japanese renal allograft recipients.
This retrospective exploratory study aimed to identify early clinical indicators of kidney prognosis in primary nephrotic syndrome (NS). Univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis identified clinical parameters in the 2-month period after initiating immunosuppressive therapy (IST); it predicted 40% reduction in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in 36 patients with primary NS. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate the performance of the predictors for the cumulative incidence of 40% reduction in the eGFR up to 8 years after initiating IST. The mean follow-up period was 71.9 months. The eGFR was reduced by 40% in four patients. Significant predictors for time to 40% reduction in the eGFR were as follows: an increase in the serum soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (s-suPAR) 2 months after initiating IST (Δs-suPAR (2M); hazard ratio (HR) for every 500 pg/mL increase: 1.36, P = 0.006 ), s-suPAR at 2 months after initiating IST (s-suPAR (2M); HR for every 500 pg/mL increase: 1.13, P = 0.015 ), urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (u-PCR) (u-PCR (2M); HR for every 1.0 g/gCr increase: 2.94, P = 0.003 ), and urinary liver-type fatty acid-binding protein (u-L-FABP) (u-L-FABP (2M); HR for every 1.0 μg/gCr increase: 1.14, P = 0.006 ). All four factors exhibited high predictive accuracy for cumulative incidence of 40% reduction in the eGFR up to 8 years after initiating IST, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.92 for Δs-suPAR (2M), 0.87 for s-suPAR (2M), 0.93 for u-PCR (2M), and 0.93 for u-L-FABP (2M). These findings suggest that Δs-suPAR (2M), s-suPAR (2M), u-PCR (2M), and u-L-FABP (2M) could be useful indicators of initial therapeutic response for predicting kidney prognosis in primary NS.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.