With the advent of fully human MAbs, the efficacy and safety have improved in the treatment of various cardiovascular, cancer, respiratory, hematology, autoimmune diseases and infections. The introduction of biosimilars will increase the affordability and utilization of MAbs in the treatment of various diseases.
Objective:To evaluate neuropsychiatric co-morbidities (depression, psychosis and anxiety) in non-demented patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).Background:Non-motor symptoms like neuropsychiatric co-morbidities are common in Parkinson's disease and may predate motor symptoms. Currently there is scarcity of data regarding neuropsychiatry manifestations in Indian patients with PD.Methods:In this cross-sectional study consecutive 126 non-demented patients with PD (MMSE ≥25) were enrolled. They were assessed using Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS), Hoehn & Yahr (H&Y) stage, Schwab and England (S&E) scale of activity of daily life. Mini-international neuropsychiatric interview (MINI) was used for diagnosis of depression, psychosis and anxiety. Beck's depression inventory (BDI), Brief psychiatric rating scale (BSRS) and Hamilton rating scale for anxiety (HAM-A) scales were used for assessment of severity of depression, psychosis and anxiety respectively.Results:Mean age and duration of disease was 57.9 ± 10.9 years and 7.3 ± 3.6 years respectively. At least one of the neuropsychiatric co-morbidity was present in 64% patients. Depression, suicidal risk, psychosis and anxiety were present in 43.7%, 31%, 23.8% and 35.7% respectively. Visual hallucinations (20.6%) were most frequent, followed by tactile (13.5%), auditory (7.2%) and olfactory hallucinations (1.6%). Patients with depression had higher motor disability (UPDRS-motor score 33.1 ± 14.0 vs 27.3 ± 13.3; and UPDRS-total 50.7 ± 21.8 vs 41.0 ± 20.3, all p values <0.05). Patients with psychosis were older (63.6 ± 8.0 years vs 56.1 ± 11.1 years, p < 0.05) and had longer duration of illness (8.6 ± 3.4 years vs 6.9 ± 3.5, p < 0.05).Conclusions:About two third patients with Parkinson's disease have associated neuropsychiatric co-morbidities. Depression was more frequent in patients with higher disability and psychosis with longer duration of disease and older age. These co-morbidities need to be addressed during management of patients with PD.
PurposeDiabetic autonomic neuropathy (DAN) is a common and disabling complication of diabetes, with cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) being a major cause of mortality and morbidity. Standard autonomic function tests (AFT) are cumbersome and time consuming to conduct in OPD setting.ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of composite autonomic symptom scale 31 (COMPASS-31) as a screening test for DAN.Patients and methodsA cross-sectional study which enrolled 60 type 2 diabetes individuals was conducted at a tertiary care center. Autonomic functions were evaluated by COMPASS-31 questionnaire as well as by standard Ewing's battery of tests; short-term heart rate variability; sympathetic skin response along with nerve conduction studies.ResultsThirty males and 24 females completed the study. Forty-nine (89%) participants had CAN, of which, 9 (17%) had definite CAN. Peripheral neuropathy was present in 20 (37%). COMPASS-31 scores showed no difference between “No CAN” and “Early CAN”. “Definite CAN” individuals differed significantly from “No and Early CAN” on COMPASS-31 scores and its gastrointestinal sub-domain. Receiver operating characteristic between “Definite CAN” and “No and Early CAN” showed fair accuracy with AUC of 0.731 (95% CI 0.561–0.901), sensitivity 77.8%, specificity 71.7% at a cut-off of 28.67 of COMPASS-31 score. Gastrointestinal sub-domain, at a cut-off score of 5.8, had 77.8% sensitivity, 60% specificity, and AUC was 0.748 (95% CI 0.603–0.894).ConclusionCOMPASS-31, a self-administered tool, requiring less time, qualifies as an acceptable screening tool, especially for definite CAN. However, individuals scoring low on COMPASS-31 are still required to be evaluated by Ewing’s battery to differentiate between “Early CAN” and “No CAN”.
Background As the health systems around the world struggled to meet the challenges of COVID-19 pandemic, care of many non-COVID emergencies was affected. Aims The present study examined differences in the diagnosis, evaluation and management of stroke patients during a defined period in the ongoing pandemic in 2020 when compared to a similar epoch in year 2019. Methods The COVID stroke study group (CSSG) India, included 18 stroke centres spread across the country. Data was collected prospectively between February and July 2020 and retrospectively for the same period in 2019. Details of demographics, stroke evaluation, treatment, in-hospital and three months outcomes were collected and compared between these two time points. Results A total of 2549 patients were seen in both study periods; 1237 patients (48.53%) in 2019 and 1312 (51.47%) in 2020. Although the overall number of stroke patients and rates of thrombolysis were comparable, a significant decline was observed in the month of April 2020, during the initial period of the pandemic and lockdown. Endovascular treatment reduced significantly and longer door to needle and CT to needle times were observed in 2020. Although mortality was higher in 2020, proportion of patients with good outcome were similar in both the study periods. Conclusions Although stroke admissions and rates of thrombolysis were comparable, some work flow metrics were delayed, endovascular stroke treatment rates declined and mortality was higher during the pandemic study period. Reorganization of stroke treatment pathways during the pandemic has likely improved the stroke care delivery across the globe.
Objectives Fibromyalgia, a painful musculoskeletal disorder is associated with sleep disturbances as well as autonomic dysfunction. Pathophysiology of fibromyalgia is yet not clear and neuroanatomical proximity of sleep and autonomic centre prompts probable involvement of the two impacting the quality of life of fibromyalgia patients. Present study was done with the objective to explore the extent of sleep disturbances and/or autonomic dysfunction in fibromyalgia and asses their impact on quality of life of fibromyalgia patients. Method and materials Thirty consecutive fibromyalgia patients (diagnosed by ACR 2010) from out-patient department and 30 age-gender matched controls were enrolled after the ethical clearance. All participants were evaluated for: (1) sleep using Pittsburgh sleep quality index and medical outcomes study sleep scale-12 Revised, (2) Quality of life by 36 item short-form health survey-36v2TM and revised fibromyalgia impact questionnaire (only patients). Autonomic functions of patients were evaluated by standard cardiovascular autonomic function tests by Ewing’s battery and heart rate variability (5-min) measurement. Results Fibromyalgia patients had increased sleep disturbances compared to controls (39.46 ± 11, 59.61 ± 2.31; p=0.0001) and very poor sleep quality (13.63 ± 4.15, 3.03 ± 1.56; p=0.0001) as well as quality of life (p=0.0001) which further deteriorated with increasing severity of fibromyalgia. Twelve patients had autonomic dysfunction but it was neither associated with sleep disturbances nor with quality of life. Conclusions Mild to moderate grade fibromyalgia patients have significant sleep disturbance, poor sleep quality which remarkably impacts their quality of life. Autonomic dysfunction is not an early feature of disease. The study suggests that full spectrum of sleep disturbances and sleep quality should be explored in fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) patients.
Background Interlocking intramedullary nail is used for almost all types of femoral shaft fractures worldwide because of its better mechanical stability. In countries like India with limited healthcare infrastructure, the use of Kuntscher nail (K-nail) in Winquist type I and type II isthmic fractures is still debated. Therefore, we conducted this study to compare the functional outcome, radiation exposure, and cost of the implant between closed reduction and internal fixation of Winquist type I and II fractures in the middle one-third shaft region by K-nail and intramedullary locked nails (IMILN), respectively. Methods This was a hospital-based non-blinded randomized trial which included 56 patients with closed Winquist type I and II femoral shaft fractures of the middle one-third femoral shaft (isthmic and paraisthmic zone). All the patients were either treated by K-nail or IMILN. The patients were followed up every three weeks for the initial six months and quarterly thereafter. Per operative duration of surgery and radiation exposure by C-arm was documented and assuming scattered radiation 20%, radiation exposure to the surgeon was calculated and patients were assessed clinically and radiologically for union. Results The patients were divided into two groups: group I (K-nail, n = 25) and group II (IMILN, n = 31). In groups I and II, the patients achieving radiological union were 88% (n = 22/25) and 84% (n = 27/31) at six months’ duration, respectively. The mean duration for the radiological union was 3.65 ± 0.55 months in group I (K-nail) and 3.76 ± 0.59 months in group II (IMILN), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the duration of the union (p = 0.4963). The average number of C- arm exposures was 16.36 ± 3.18 in group I as compared to 27.29 ± 4.01 in group II, and the mean scattered radiation was 5.0 ± 1.63 in group I and 6.61 ± 4.06 in group II. This difference was statistically significant. Conclusion Kuntscher intramedullary nailing can provide comparable rates of union as is achieved with interlocking intramedullary nailing with an advantage of less radiation exposure and duration of surgery, provided the patient selection is proper (isthmic and paraisthmic zone).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.