Treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with chemoradiotherapy can now accomplish excellent locoregional disease control, but patient overall survival (OS) remains limited by development of distant metastases (DM). We investigated the prognostic value of staging 18 F-FDG PET/CT, beyond clinical risk factors, for predicting DM and OS in 176 patients after definitive chemoradiotherapy. Methods: The PET parameters maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were recorded. Univariate Cox regression was used to examine the prognostic value of these variables and clinical prognosticators for local treatment failure (LTF), OS, and DM. Multivariate analysis examined the effect of SUVmax, TLG, and MTV in the presence of other covariates. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate prognostic values of PET/CT parameters. Results: Primary tumors were distributed across all stages. Most patients underwent chemoradiotherapy only, and 11 also underwent tonsillectomy. On univariate analysis, primary tumor MTV was predictive of LTF (P 5 0.005, hazard ratio [HR] 5 2.4 for a doubling of MTV), DM and OS (P , 0.001 for both, HR 5 1.9 and 1.8, respectively). The primary tumor TLG was associated with DM and OS (P , 0.001, HR 5 1.6 and 1.7, respectively, for a doubling of TLG). The primary tumor SUVmax was associated with death (P 5 0.029, HR 5 1.1 for a 1-unit increase in standardized uptake value) but had no relationship with LTF or DM. In multivariate analysis, TLG and MTV remained associated with death after correcting for T stage (P 5 0.0125 and 0.0324, respectively) whereas no relationship was seen between standardized uptake value and death after adjusting for T stage (P 5 0.158). Conclusion: Parameters capturing the volume of 18 F-FDG-positive disease (MTV or TLG) provide important prognostic information in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy and should be considered for risk stratification in this disease.
Traditionally, patients treated with chemoradiotherapy for node-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (N+ OPSCC) have undergone a planned neck dissection (ND) after treatment. Recently, negative post-treatment positron-emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging has been found to have a high negative predictive value for the presence of residual disease in the neck. Here we present the first comprehensive analysis of a large, uniform cohort of N+ OPSCC patients achieving a PET/CT-based complete response (CR) after chemoradiotherapy, and undergoing observation, rather than ND. From 2002 to 2009, 302 patients with N+ OPSCC treated with 70 Gy intensity-modulated radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy underwent post-treatment clinical assessment including PET/CT. CR was defined as no evidence of disease on clinical examination and post-treatment PET/CT. ND was reserved for patients with
The objectives of this study are to illustrate the effects of immortal time bias (ITB) using an oncology outcomes database and quantify through simulations the magnitude and direction of ITB when different analytical techniques are used. A cohort of 11 626 women who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and underwent mastectomy with pathologically positive lymph nodes were accrued from the National Cancer Database (2004-2008). Standard Cox regression, time-dependent (TD), and landmark models were used to compare overall survival in patients who did or did not receive postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). Simulation studies showing ways to reduce the effect of ITB indicate that TD exposures should be included as variables in hazard-based analyses. Standard Cox regression models comparing overall survival in patients who did and did not receive PMRT showed a significant treatment effect (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88-0.99). Time-dependent and landmark methods estimated no treatment effect with HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.92 to 1.03 and HR: 0.98, 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.04, respectively. In our simulation studies, the standard Cox regression model significantly overestimated treatment effects when no effect was present. Estimates of TD models were closest to the true treatment effect. Landmark model results were highly dependent on landmark timing. Appropriate statistical approaches that account for ITB are critical to minimize bias when examining relationships between receipt of PMRT and survival.
Background To analyze postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) utilization and its association with overall survival (OS) in breast cancer patients with pathologically positive lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods Using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), we identified women with non-metastatic breast cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 who received NAC and underwent mastectomy with macroscopic pathologically positive lymph nodes. Joinpoint regression models were used to assess temporal trends in annual PMRT utilization. Multivariable regression models identified factors associated with PMRT use. A time-dependent Cox model was used to evaluate predictors of mortality. Results The study included 29,270 patients, of whom 62.5% received PMRT. PMRT was markedly underutilized among all nodal subgroups, particularly among ypN2 (68.4%) and ypN3 (67.0%) patients. Hispanic patients and those with Medicaid/Medicare insurance were less likely to receive PMRT compared to non-Hispanics and patients with other insurance carriers. Adjusted 5-year OS rates were similar in ypN1 and ypN2 patients with or without PMRT but were significantly higher in ypN3 patients receiving PMRT (66% vs. 63%, p=0.042). In multivariable analysis, PMRT was associated with improved survival only among ypN3 patients after adjusting for patient, facility, and tumor variables (multivariable hazard ratio 0.85, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.97). Conclusion(s) A considerable portion of breast cancer patients with advanced residual nodal disease after NAC did not receive appropriate adjuvant radiation. There are socioeconomic disparities in national PMRT practice patterns. Patients with ypN3 disease may derive a survival benefit from PMRT.
The standard treatment for early-stage breast cancer is breast conservation therapy, consisting of breast conserving surgery followed by adjuvant radiation treatment (RT). Conventionally-fractionated whole breast irradiation (CF-WBI) has been the standard RT regimen, but recently shorter courses of hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HF-WBI) have been advocated for patient convenience and reduction in healthcare costs and resources. Areas covered: This review covers the major randomized European and Canadian trials comparing HF-WBI to CF-WBI with long-term follow-up, as well as additional recently closed randomized trials that further seek to define the applicability of HF-WBI in clinical practice. Randomized data is summarized in terms of clinical utility and for a variety of clinical applications. Recently published consensus guidelines and practical implementation of HF-WBI including its broader effect on the healthcare system are reviewed. Finally, an assessment of the emerging evidence in support of hypofractionation for locally advanced disease is presented. Expert commentary: HF-WBI has replaced CF-WBI as the accepted standard of care in most women with early-stage breast cancer who do not require regional nodal irradiation. Early data supports the continued study of hypofractionation in the locally advanced setting, however broad adoption awaits longer follow-up and additional data from ongoing clinical trials.
ObjectivesThe purpose of this study is to independently compare the performance of the inverse planning algorithm utilized in Gamma Knife (GK) Lightning Treatment Planning System (TPS) to manual forward planning, between experienced and inexperienced users, for different types of targets.Materials and MethodsForty patients treated with GK stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for pituitary adenoma (PA), vestibular schwannoma (VS), post-operative brain metastases (pBM), and intact brain metastases (iBM) were randomly selected, ten for each site. Three inversely optimized plans were generated for each case by two experienced planners (OptExp1 and OptExp2) and a novice planner (OptNov) using GK Lightning TPS. For each treatment site, the Gradient Index (GI), the Paddick Conformity Index (PCI), the prescription percentage, the scaled beam-on time (sBOT), the number of shots used, and dosimetric metrics to OARs were compared first between the inversely optimized plans and the manually generated clinical plans, and then among the inversely optimized plans. Statistical analyses were performed using the Student’s t-test and the ANOVA followed by the post-hoc Tukey tests.ResultsThe GI for the inversely optimized plans significantly outperformed the clinical plans for all sites. PCIs were similar between the inversely optimized and clinical plans for PA and VS, but were significantly improved in the inversely optimized plans for iBM and pBM. There were no significant differences in the sBOT between the inversely optimized and clinical plans, except for the PA cases. No significant differences were observed in dosimetric metrics, except for lower brain V12Gy and PTV D98% in the inversely optimized plans for iBM. There were no noticeable differences in plan qualities among the inversely optimized plans created by the novice and experienced planners.ConclusionInverse planning in GK Lightning TPS produces GK SRS plans at least equivalent in plan quality and similar in sBOT compared to manual forward planning in this independent validation study. The automatic workflow of inversed planning ensures a consistent plan quality regardless of a planner’s experience.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.