Background There is widespread concern over the impact of public health measures, such as lockdowns, associated with COVID-19 on mental health, including suicide. High-quality evidence from low-income and middle-income countries, where the burden of suicide and self-harm is greatest, is scarce. We aimed to determine the effect of the pandemic on hospital presentations for self-poisoning.Methods In this interrupted time-series analysis, we established a new self-poisoning register at the tertiary care Teaching Hospital Peradeniya in Sri Lanka, a lower-middle-income country. Using a standard extraction sheet, data were gathered for all patients admitted to the Toxicology Unit with self-poisoning between Jan 1, 2019, and Aug 31, 2020. Only patients classified by the treating clinician as having intentionally self-poisoned were included. Data on date of admission, age or date of birth, sex, and poisoning method were collected. No data on ethnicity were available. We used interrupted time-series analysis to calculate weekly hospital admissions for self-poisoning before (Jan 1, 2019-March 19, 2020) and during (March 20-Aug 31, 2020) the pandemic, overall and by age (age <25 years vs ≥25 years) and sex. Individuals with missing date of admission were excluded from the main analysis.

On the basis of National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance we conducted a survey in a sexual health clinic to assess acceptability of an alcohol screening questionnaire, rates of hazardous drinking and success of referral to a specialist alcohol service (Aquarius). Seventy-two percent of patients accepted the offer of screening, of whom 34% were hazardous drinkers; 2.6% consented to referral to Aquarius but failed to attend. We estimate the cost range to screen and deliver a five-minute brief intervention at £3.62-£9.19 per case. Opportunistic alcohol screening identifies high rates of hazardous drinkers and is acceptable to patients, but onward referral by untrained staff to an external specialist alcohol service is unsatisfactory to patients. Research into the cost-effectiveness of screening and delivery of brief interventions within sexual health clinics is required.

Evidence from high-income countries suggests that the impact of COVID-19 on suicide and self-harm has been limited, but evidence from low- and middle-income countries is lacking. Using data from a hospital-based self-poisoning register (January 2019–December 2021) and data from national records (2016–2021) of suicide in Sri Lanka, we aimed to assess the impact of the pandemic on both self-poisoning and suicide. We examined changes in admissions for self-poisoning and suicide using interrupted time series (ITS) analysis. For the self-poisoning hospital admission ITS models, we defined the lockdown periods as follows: (i) pre-lockdown: 01/01/2019–19/03/2020; (ii) first lockdown: 20/03/2020–27/06/2020; (iii) post-first lockdown: 28/06/2020–11/05/2021; (iv) second lockdown: 12/05/2021–21/06/2021; and (v) post-second lockdown: 22/06/2021–31/12/2021. For suicide, we defined the intervention according to the pandemic period. We found that during lockdown periods, there was a reduction in hospital admissions for self-poisoning, with evidence that admission following self-poisoning remained lower during the pandemic than would be expected based on pre-pandemic trends. In contrast, there was no evidence that the rate of suicide in the pandemic period differed from that which would be expected. As the long-term socioeconomic impacts of the pandemic are realised, it will be important to track rates of self-harm and suicide in LMICs to inform prevention.

Background Clinical manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID19) can vary from asymptomatic to profusely symptomatic due to many factors. Having data on the clinical characteristics of the affected patients is important for the screening and diagnosis of COVID-19. Main objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical and epidemiological characteristics and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 admitted to six treatment centres in Sri Lanka. Methods For the specific epidemic situation of COVID-19, we chose to conduct a descriptive retrospective study from six treatment centres in the country between March 10, 2020 and May 30, 2020. Results The study included 431 laboratory confirmed patients with COVID-19. Of them, 335 (78.2%) were males and their mean age was 37 years. Most patients (373: 86.5%) had had close contact with COVID-19 positive patients. The majority were asymptomatic (243: 56.3%) and of the symptomatic patients, the most common symptom was sore throat (81, 19%), followed by cough (72, 17%), headache (72, 17%), fever (50, 12%), and nasal discharge (36, 8%). Eight patients required either high dependency care or intensive unit care two of them succumbed to the illness (0.5%). Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was used as a treatment in 248 patients and they had a significantly longer (17.6 days) duration of hospital stays compared those who were not treated (13.6 days) with HCQ. When the HCQ was not used as a treatment, asymptomatic individuals had significantly shorter durations of hospital (11.1 days) stays compared to symptomatic individuals (14.3 days). Conclusions The majority of patients remained asymptomatic during the course of illness. The most common symptom was sore throat, seen in one fifth of patients, followed by cough, and headache. Our study also indicated the possibility of reduced viral clearance and hence longer duration of hospital stays with HCQ.

The helter-skelter nodules; a rare case of bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis in a patient with neurofibromatosis type-2