There is a proposition that the possible occurrence of electrostatic discharges inside an oxygen regulator between charged insulating components, such as diaphragms, and earthed metal components, such as the valve stem, could be a potential candidate responsible for oxygen regulator fires. In this paper, the electric field which might be produced at the tip of the valve stem due to charge produced on the diaphragm of a typical oxygen regulator by deposition of charged dust particles or by their impact on the diaphragm or both has been evaluated. The diaphragm, in many cases, is backed partially by a concentric earthed metal disk. The diaphragm has been modelled as an insulating disk. The tip of the valve stem has been modelled as an earthed sphere which is very small compared to the insulating disk and the backing earthed metal disk. An analytical expression for the electric field produced at the point of the sphere nearest to the charged surface of the insulator has been derived. Our expression takes into account not only the effect of the charge on the insulating disk, but also that due to the presence of the backing earthed metal disk. Results for the magnitude of this electric field have been computed for the case of a sample oxygen regulator. An expression for the critical charge density on the surface of the insulating disk has been derived, and its value has been obtained for the case of our sample oxygen regulator. The electric field inside the non-metal diaphragm has also been evaluated. It appears from our analyses that there is a possibility that an electrostatic discharge might occur inside an oxygen regulator, and with an enriched-oxygen atmosphere being present there, such a discharge could also lead to a fire incident.
This paper presents an electrostatic situation in which the circulation of an electrostatic field around a closed path is non-zero. This fact contradicts the theorem that the circulation of an electrostatic field around any closed path is zero.
Induced charge errors lead to underestimation of transferred charge in brush discharges when the measurement is done using fast-response unshielded probes. The discrepancy observed between the values of charge-collection efficiency for different charge-transfer thresholds obtained theoretically by Walmsley [2] and those obtained experimentally by Chowdhury et al [3] necessitates figuring out ways to improve the mathematical model used by Walmsley. A close perusal of the said work by Walmsley [2] has pointed out an error therein– in the use of the equation reff = KD. I propose here a way to get rid of this error, and in doing so, I propose a method of calculating the charge-collection efficiency in charge-transfer measurement for brush discharges more reliable than that used by Walmsley [2].
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.