Aims:  To determine the distribution of Salmonella serovars in seafood and to examine the intraserovar genetic variations in Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Rissen and Salmonella Weltevreden by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)‐ribotyping and enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC)‐PCR methods. Method and Results:  A total of 417 seafood samples collected over 2003–2006 from fishing harbours and fish markets of Cochin (India) was studied for presence of Salmonella serovars. Seafood samples were analysed for the presence of Salmonella by Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM), U.S. Food & Drug Administration (USFDA) method. The study indicated that 23·2% of the seafood samples were positive for Salmonella and a total of 241 Salmonella isolates comprising of 27 different serovars were isolated from seafood. S. Weltevreden, Salmonella Rissen, Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Derby were found to be the most predominant serovars in seafood. PCR‐ribotypes and ERIC‐PCR profiles showed multiple genotypic profiles for S. Rissen and S. Weltevreden in seafood and the level of discrimination indices obtained was at 0·974 for S. Rissen and 0·988 for S. Weltevreden, respectively. Conclusion:  The study highlighted the major Salmonella serovars in the seafood of Cochin (India) and molecular fingerprinting pattern revealed genetic variation among S. Rissen and S. Weltevreden. Significance and Impact of the Study:  Widespread occurrence of Salmonella contamination in seafood and multiple clones of S. Rissen and S. Weltevreden detected in seafood, thus, indicated the diverse routes of Salmonella contamination in seafood.

Aims:  The study evaluated the efficiency of culture, enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for the detection of Salmonella in naturally contaminated seafood. Methods and Results:  In this study, 215 seafood samples comprising fish, shrimp, crab, clam, mussel, oyster, squid, cuttlefish and octopus from fish market of Cochin (India), were compared by culture, ELISA and PCR methods. Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) method was followed for culture assay, and Salmonella Tek, a commercial sandwich ELISA kit, was used for ELISA assay. Salmonella‐specific PCR assay was developed for 284 bp Salmonella‐specific invA gene amplicon. PCR assay exhibited 31·6% seafood positive for Salmonella followed by ELISA (23·7%) and culture method (21·3%). There was fair to excellent agreement between culture, ELISA and PCR assays (kappa coefficient values ranging from 0·385 to 1·0) for different seafood samples. Conclusion:  The investigation revealed the greater concordance between culture and ELISA methods for seafood. Among the three methods, PCR assay was most sensitive. Lower detection rate with culture and ELISA assays could be attributed to greater sensitivity of the PCR method in the detection of Salmonella in seafood. Significance and Impact of the Study:  We propose the incorporation of dual tests based on different principle and procedure for the routine analysis of Salmonella in seafood.

Escherichia coli is a common contaminant of seafood in the tropics and is often encountered in high numbers. The count of E. coli as well as verotoxigenic E. coli O157:H7 was estimated in 414 finfish samples composed of 23 species of fresh fish from retail markets and frozen fish from cold storage outlets in and around Cochin, India. A total of 484 presumptive E. coli were isolated, and their indole-methyl red-Voges-Proskauer-citrate (IMViC) pattern was determined. These strains were also tested for labile toxin production by a reverse passive latex agglutination method and checked for E. coli serotype O157 by latex agglutination with O157-specific antisera. Certain biochemical marker tests, such as methylumbelliferyl-beta-glucuronide (MUG), sorbitol fermentation, decarboxylase reactions, and hemolysis, which are useful for screening pathogenic E. coli, were also carried out. Results showed that 81.4% of the E. coli isolates were sorbitol positive. Among this group, 82% were MUG positive, and 14.46% of the total E. coli isolates showed human blood hemolysis. None of the isolates were positive for agglutination with E. coli O157 antisera nor did any produce heat-labile enterotoxin. This study indicates that typical E. coli O157 or labile toxin-producing E. coli is absent in the fish and fishery environments of Cochin (India). However, the presence of MUG and sorbitol-negative strains that are also hemolytic indicates the existence of aberrant strains, which require further investigation.

No abstract

Foodborne outbreaks attributed to the contamination of foods with enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) O157:H7 are a growing global concern. Fish and shrimp samples obtained from different retail fish markets in Cochin, India, were screened by direct PCR assays targeting three important virulence markers of EHEC, the intimin protein (eaeA gene), enterohemolysin (hlyA gene), and Shiga toxin (stx gene). One shrimp (Fenneropenaeus indicus) sample was positive for all these virulence markers, and seven typical E. coli O157:H7 isolates were recovered from the marker-positive shrimp sample. This is the first report of recovery of typical E. coli O157:H7 from fish or shellfish in India. All the typical EHEC isolates had a characteristic reaction in eosin methylene blue agar and belonged to IMViC (indole, methyl red, Voges Proskauer, Simmons citrate reactions) biotype I. These isolates also were negative for sorbitol and methylumbelliferyl-beta-glucuronide and exhibited beta-hemolytic activity. One isolate showed self-agglutination for E. coli O157 antisera and produced a false-positive reaction with CHROMagar O157. These typical EHEC isolates belonged to a restricted biotype group and had a very low multiple antibiotic resistance index. Isolation of E. coli O157:H7 in fish and shellfish indicates that strict adherence to hygienic handling methods and proper cooking or processing is needed before consumption of these products.