Tuberculosis has been greatest mimicker in medicine. Tuberculosis of skeletal system can simulate a malignancy both clinically and radiologically. As tuberculosis of Ulna is a rare, we report a case of unifocaldiaphyseal tubercular osteomyeliti s of Ulna which resembled malignancy in a 60yrs male with mildly painful, gradually increasing swelling over dorso medial aspect of left distal forearm since 5 months durati on. Radiological fi ndings were suggesti ve of aggressive bone tumor and biopsy was planned. Tru-cut biopsy revealed sterile pus and open biopsy was performed. Intraoperati vely there was cheesy pus with fl akes of sequestra and multi ple breaches in ulna cortex. Histo-pathological examinati on revealed chronic infl ammatory granulomatous lesion suggesti ve of tubercular osteomyeliti s. We report this case not only because tuberculosis of ulna is rare, but also because it mimicked malignant bone tumor both clinico-radiologically leading to delay in diagnosis and insti tuti on of treatment.
Calcific tendinitis occurs frequently in shoulder and hip region. Its occurrence in elbow joint is frequently misdiagnosed because of its rare incidence and similar clinical presentation with other acute conditions of elbow like trauma, infection and tennis elbow. Characteristic symptoms of this condition are acute onset of pain, tenderness and swelling on the lateral aspect the elbow. Plain Radiograph is the primary modality to distinguish and evaluate this condition. Awareness and familiarity with this condition helps in early diagnosis and avoids unnecessary treatments and biopsy as this condition is self-limited.Keywords: Calcific tendinitis; self-limited; tennis elbow.
Introduction: Implant removal surgery is one of the common surgical procedures done in orthopedics. Studies report that a major portion of orthopedic surgeries carried out in different institutions comprises implant removal procedures. This can be challenging in limited manpower and infrastructure availability scenarios, like in developing countries like Nepal. This study aims to study the prevalence of orthopedic implant removal procedures carried out among overall surgical procedures in the orthopedic department of a tertiary care center in Nepal. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was performed on the medical records of the department of orthopedics of a tertiary care center after approval from the institutional review committee. The data included records from the starting of 2018 to the end of 2019. Data related to the number of implant removal procedures, types of implants, indications, fracture sites, anesthesia use, gender and age distribution were studied. Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 20 was used to study descriptive data. Results: Out of 2557 orthopedic operations carried out in the study duration, 458 (17.91%) of implant removal procedures were done in the department. The most common age group was the young adult age group, 255 (55.68%). Medium-sized implants were the commonly removed ones, 337 (73.58%). Elective procedures were the most common indication, 369 (80.57%). Conclusions: Implant removal procedures cover a major fraction of overall orthopedic operations carried out by the department, most of which are elective procedures. In limited-resource settings, this can be challenging, and a proper evaluation with counseling could be done before implant removal surgery.
Introduction: Orthopaedic surgical activity has been significantly affected by COVID-19 pandemic. The decision to perform operative interventions is based on balancing risk to benefit to the patient and health care workers. Though different guidelines have been published, there is a lack of reliable data on orthopaedic surgical activities. Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Orthopaedic surgeries comparing with the previous year. Methods: This was an epidemiological retrospective comparative study conducted at Shree Birendra Hospital, Nepal after taking ethical approval from the Institutional Review Committee of NAIHS. Data of the first four month of orthopaedic surgeries after National lockdown (from March 24 to July 23, 2020) and the same four month period of the previous year (The year 2019) were retrieved. The demographic profiles and operations categories (trauma, elective and infections) were compared between two periods using SPSS 21. Result: Out of total of 651 patients enrolled, 169 patients operated during the pandemic compared with 482 patients before the pandemic. There was a 65% reduction in total surgical procedures, 94% reduction in elective cases and trauma cases were reduced by 29% (P < 0.05). Implant removal (107, 42.8%) constituted the highest elective cases in the year 2019. Conclusions: The orthopaedic surgical procedures were decreased in frequency during COVID-19 because of a decrease in elective cases. The total trauma patients remained more equable during pandemic despite strict lock-down. Health care facilities should consider this during post pandemic recovery.
Introduction: Shoulder dislocation is common injury requiring urgent reduction. For the reason that patient is not nill orally and anesthetists are not available, reduction under intra venous anaesthesia is not possible. This study was aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of intraarticular lidocaine and stimson's technique of shoulder dislocation, which could be performed without anesthetist and irrespective of nill orally status. Methods: A prospective observational study was performed from December 2009 to December 2010. Under all antiseptic precautions 20 ml of Lidocaine was injected intraarticularly and reduction was performed by Stimson's technique. Visual Analogue Score, time for reduction and failure to reduction by this technique was recorded. Results: Out of 27 dislocations 22 were successfully reduced and remaining required added scapular manipulation. The mean VAS scor was 2.3±1.26 and the mean time of reduction was 17.96±1.9 minutes. Conclusion: Stimson's method with Intraarticular Lidocaine is effective, safe, less costly and can be performed in periphery where anesthetist and monitoring facilities are not available.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.