Purpose: To report early safety and efficacy of Descemet stripping only (DSO) supplemented with ripasudil. Methods: A pre-post clinical trial with a historical control group for time to heal and cell count parameters. The study received ethics approval and was conducted with oversight of a data safety monitoring board. All enrolled patients had a superior endothelial cell count of >1000 cells/mm2 and were symptomatic from the presence of central guttata degrading vision and/or producing glare. DSO was carried out with a peeling technique and not combined with any other intervention. Ripasudil 0.4% was applied topically from day 1 postoperatively at a dose of 6 times/d until corneal clearance. Cases with relapse of edema were permitted to restart on ripasudil at a reduced dose of 2 drops/d for a further 2 weeks. Stopping rules with progression to a corneal graft were established. Baseline ocular and systemic investigations were carried out and repeated at varying intervals to monitor for local and systemic adverse events. Results: Twenty-three eyes of 23 patients met the inclusion criteria and underwent DSO. Twenty-two of 23 eyes achieved corneal clearance at a mean time of 4.1 weeks. In all patients achieving clearance, improvement in vision was recorded. Improvement in mean uncorrected visual acuity was 0.20 Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMar), and improvement in mean best spectacle corrected visual acuity was 0.156 LogMar. One patient failed to clear and underwent Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty at week 12. Twenty-one of 22 patients achieving corneal clearance expressed satisfaction with the procedure. The commonest systemic side effect of topical ripasudil was gastrointestinal upset (24%), and the commonest local side effect was ocular irritation (43%). No patient experienced a serious adverse event in the course of the trial. Thirty-nine percent of patients experienced a relapse of edema on ceasing ripasudil, with clearance again on recommencing. Conclusions: This trial of DSO supplemented with ripasudil included local and systemic safety analysis. We judge that this treatment option is emerging as a reliable intervention for select patients with Fuchs' Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy (FECD) with an acceptable safety profile. The observation of relapse edema is strong evidence of a drug effect. The longevity of these results remains unknown.

No abstract

All 3 devices were easy to use for biometry before cataract surgery. Measurements with the new PCI device took half as long as those with the gold standard device. Measurements with the new OLCR device took twice as long as those with the gold standard device.

Autokeratometry yielded the least measuring noise but OCT as well as hybrid topography had better predictive precision due to posterior curvature data. Scheimpflug tomography suffered from high measuring noise. Combination of keratometry and OCT data yielded the best precision for planning of toric IOL implantation. To get a reliable target cylinder for TIOL calculation, accuracy of the measuring device is crucial. Keratometry and Placido topography lack the information of the posterior corneal curvature while Scheimpflug devices suffer from higher measuring noise. In this paper, a combination of ssOCT with autokeratometry yielded the best predictive quality.

No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Toric IOLs and PCRIs both reduced astigmatism; however, toric IOLs reduced astigmatism to a higher extent and they were more predictable.

PurposeTo evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in a patient cohort with short axial eye length to assess the performance of IOL power calculation schemes in strong hyperopes.MethodologyThe study was a single centre, single surgeon retrospective consecutive case series at the Augen- und Laserklinik, Castrop-Rauxel, Germany. Inclusion of patients after uneventful cataract surgery implanting either spherical (SA60AT) or aspheric (ZCB00) IOLs. Inclusion criteria were axial eye length <21.5 mm and/or emmetropising IOL power >28.5 D. Lens constants were optimised on a separate patient cohort considering the full bandwidth of axial eye length. Data of one single eye per patient were randomly included. The outcome measures were: mean absolute prediction error (MAE), median absolute prediction error, mean prediction error with SD and median prediction error and the percentage of eyes with an MAE within 0.25 D, 0.5 D, 0.75 D and 1.0 D.ResultsA total of 150 eyes from 150 patients were assessed. Okulix, PEARL-DGS, Kane and Castrop provided a statistically significantly smaller MAE compared with the Hoffer Q and SRK/T formulae.ConclusionIn our patient cohort with short axial eye length, the use of PEARL-DGS, Okulix, Kane or Castrop formulae showed the lowest MAE. The Castrop formula has not been published before, but will be disclosed with a ready-to-use Excel sheet as an addendum to this paper.

Patients in the study group were significantly better informed than patients in the control group. These findings show that the interactive computer-based tool is a useful tutorial to achieve a better informed-consent process for cataract surgery.