Eukaryotes use distinct polymerases for leading- and lagging-strand replication, but how they target their respective strands is uncertain. We reconstituted Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication forks and found that CMG helicase selects polymerase (Pol) ε to the exclusion of Pol δ on the leading strand. Even if Pol δ assembles on the leading strand, Pol ε rapidly replaces it. Pol δ–PCNA is distributive with CMG, in contrast to its high stability on primed ssDNA. Hence CMG will not stabilize Pol δ, instead leaving the leading strand accessible for Pol ε and stabilizing Pol ε. Comparison of Pol ε and Pol δ on a lagging-strand model DNA reveals the opposite. Pol δ dominates over excess Pol ε on PCNA-primed ssDNA. Thus, PCNA strongly favors Pol δ over Pol ε on the lagging strand, but CMG over-rides and flips this balance in favor of Pol ε on the leading strand.

Background: The high speed and processivity of replicative DNA polymerases reside in a processivity factor which has been shown to be a ring-shaped protein. This protein ('sliding clamp') encircles DNA and tethers the catalytic unit to the template. Although in eukaryotic, prokaryotic and bacteriophage-T4 systems, the processivity factors are ring-shaped, they assume different oligomeric states. The Escherichia coli clamp (the¯subunit) is active as a dimer while the eukaryotic and T4 phage clamps (PCNA and gp45, respectively) are active as trimers. The clamp can not assemble itself on DNA. Instead, a protein complex known as a clamp loader utilizes ATP to assemble the ring around the primer-template. This study compares properties of the human PCNA clamp with those of E. coli and T4 phage.

Although three human genes encoding DNA ligases have been isolated, the molecular mechanisms by which these gene products specifically participate in different DNA transactions are not well understood. In this study, fractionation of a HeLa nuclear extract by DNA ligase I affinity chromatography resulted in the specific retention of a replication protein, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), by the affinity resin. Subsequent experiments demonstrated that DNA ligase I and PCNA interact directly via the amino-terminal 118 aa of DNA ligase I, the same region of DNA ligase I that is required for localization of this enzyme at replication foci during S phase. PCNA, which forms a sliding clamp around duplex DNA, interacts with DNA pol ␦ and enables this enzyme to synthesize DNA processively. An interaction between DNA ligase I and PCNA that is topologically linked to DNA was detected. However, DNA ligase I inhibited PCNA-dependent DNA synthesis by DNA pol ␦. These observations suggest that a ternary complex of DNA ligase I, PCNA and DNA pol ␦ does not form on a gapped DNA template. Consistent with this idea, the cell cycle inhibitor p21, which also interacts with PCNA and inhibits processive DNA synthesis by DNA pol ␦, disrupts the DNA ligase I-PCNA complex. Thus, we propose that after Okazaki fragment DNA synthesis is completed by a PCNA-DNA pol ␦ complex, DNA pol ␦ is released, allowing DNA ligase I to bind to PCNA at the nick between adjacent Okazaki fragments and catalyze phosphodiester bond formation.DNA-joining events are required during the replication of the mammalian genome because of the discontinuous nature of lagging strand DNA synthesis. There is substantial biochemical evidence indicating that DNA ligase I, which is one of four DNA ligases in mammalian cells (1, 2), is the enzyme responsible for joining Okazaki fragments. The involvement of DNA ligase I in DNA replication was first suggested by studies demonstrating an elevated level of this enzyme activity in regenerating liver compared with normal liver (3). More recently, DNA ligase I has been identified as a component of a high molecular weight replication complex (4, 5) and has been shown to efficiently join Okazaki fragments in a DNA replication assay with other highly purified replication proteins (6, 7).In agreement with this putative role in DNA replication, human DNA ligase I cDNA complements the conditional lethal phenotype of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae cdc9 DNA ligase mutant (8), and LIG1 homozygous null mouse embryonic stem cells are viable only when a full-length DNA ligase I cDNA is ectopically expressed (9). Moreover, a DNA ligase I mutant human cell line, 46BR, exhibits abnormal joining of Okazaki fragments (10-13). The replication defect in extracts from this cell line can be complemented by the addition of DNA ligase I but not by the addition of DNA ligase III or T4 DNA ligase (14).DNA polymerases ␣ and ␦, replication protein A, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), replication factor C (RF-C), RNase H, FEN1, and DNA...

The concentration of ribonucleoside triphosphates (rNTPs) in cells is far greater than the concentration of deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs), and this pool imbalance presents a challenge for DNA polymerases (Pols) to select their proper substrate. This report examines the effect of nucleotide pool imbalance on the rate and fidelity of the Escherichia coli replisome. We find that rNTPs decrease replication fork rate by competing with dNTPs at the active site of the C-family Pol III replicase at a step that does not require correct base-pairing. The effect of rNTPs on Pol rate generalizes to B-family eukaryotic replicases, Pols δ and e. Imbalance of the dNTP pool also slows the replisome and thus is not specific to rNTPs. We observe a measurable frequency of rNMP incorporation that predicts one rNTP incorporated every 2.3 kb during chromosome replication. Given the frequency of rNMP incorporation, the repair of rNMPs is likely rapid. RNase HII nicks DNA at single rNMP residues to initiate replacement with dNMP. Considering that rNMPs will mark the new strand, RNase HII may direct strand-specificity for mismatch repair (MMR). How the newly synthesized strand is recognized for MMR is uncertain in eukaryotes and most bacteria, which lack a methyl-directed nicking system. Here we demonstrate that Bacillus subtilis incorporates rNMPs in vivo, that RNase HII plays a role in their removal, and the RNase HII gene deletion enhances mutagenesis, suggesting a possible role of incorporated rNMPs in MMR.T he structures of ribonucleoside triphosphates (rNTPs) and deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs) differ by a single atom, yet each must be distinguished by DNA and RNA polymerases (Pols). This is more challenging for DNA Pols because the intracellular concentration of rNTPs is 10-100-fold higher than that of dNTPs (1-3). DNA is more stabile than RNA, and rNMP residues in DNA could lead to spontaneous strand breaks. Hence, it is important to genomic integrity that DNA Pols exclude rNMPs from incorporation into the genome (1, 4).Structural studies reveal that DNA Pols distinguish ribo and deoxyribo sugars via a "steric gate," in which a bulky residue or main chain atom sterically occludes binding of the ribo 2′OH (5, 6). However, the single-atom difference between rNTPs and dNTPs imposes an upper limit to sugar recognition, and thus DNA Pols incorporate rNMPs at a low frequency. For example, studies in yeast demonstrate that rNMPs are incorporated in vivo, and studies in vitro demonstrate a frequency of rNMP incorporation predicting that 10,000 rNMPs or more may be incorporated each replication cycle (2,7,8). Given their abundant incorporation, there are probably multiple pathways to remove rNMPs, as their persistence is associated with genomic instability in yeast (7, 9).The current study reconstitutes the Escherichia coli replisome and examines the cost of rNTP/dNTP nucleotide pool imbalance on the frequency of rNMP incorporation and the rate of fork progression. We find that a nucleotide pool imbalance slows the ...