The formation of membraneless organelles in cells commonly occurs via liquid−liquid phase separation (LLPS) and is in many cases driven by multivalent interactions between intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs). Investigating the nature of these interactions, and their effect on dynamics within the condensed phase, is therefore of critical importance but very challenging for either simulation or experiment. Here, we study these interactions and their dynamics by pairing a novel multiscale simulation strategy with microsecond all-atom MD simulations of a condensed, IDP-rich phase. We simulate two IDPs this way, the low complexity domain of FUS and the N-terminal disordered domain of LAF-1, and find good agreement with experimental information about average density, water content, and residue−residue contacts. We go significantly beyond what is known from experiments by showing that ion partitioning within the condensed phase is largely driven by the charge distribution of the proteins andin the cases consideredshows little evidence of preferential interactions of the ions with the proteins. Furthermore, we can probe the microscopic diffusive dynamics within the condensed phase, showing that water and ions are in dynamic equilibrium between dense and dilute phases, and their diffusion is reduced in the dense phase. Despite their high concentration in the condensate, the protein molecules also remain mobile, explaining the observed liquid-like properties of this phase. We finally show that IDP self-association is driven by a combination of nonspecific hydrophobic interactions as well as hydrogen bonds, salt bridges, and π−π and cation−π interactions. The simulation approach presented here allows the structural and dynamical properties of biomolecular condensates to be studied in microscopic detail and is generally applicable to single-and multicomponent systems of proteins and nucleic acids involved in LLPS.

No abstract

No abstract

This perspective article highlights recent progress and emerging challenges in understanding the formation and function of membraneless organelles (MLOs). A long-term goal in the MLO field is to identify the sequence-encoded rules that dictate the formation of compositionally controlled biomolecular condensates, which cells utilize to perform a wide variety of functions. The molecular organization of the different components within a condensate can vary significantly, ranging from a homogeneous mixture to core–shell droplet structures. We provide many examples to highlight the richness of the observed behavior and potential research directions for improving our mechanistic understanding. The tunable environment within condensates can, in principle, alter enzymatic activity significantly. We examine recent examples where this was demonstrated, including applications in synthetic biology. An important question about MLOs is the role of liquid-like material properties in biological function. We discuss the need for improved quantitative characterization tools and the development of sequence–structure–dynamics relationships.

Heterochromatin protein 1α (HP1α) is a crucial element of chromatin organization. It has been proposed that HP1α functions through liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS), which allows it to compact chromatin into transcriptionally repressed heterochromatin regions. In vitro, HP1α can undergo phase separation upon phosphorylation of its N-terminus extension (NTE) and/or through interactions with DNA and chromatin. Here, we combine computational and experimental approaches to elucidate the molecular interactions that drive these processes. In phosphorylation-driven LLPS, HP1α can exchange intradimer hinge-NTE interactions with interdimer contacts, which also leads to a structural change from a compacted to an extended HP1α dimer conformation. This process can be enhanced by the presence of positively charged HP1α peptide ligands and disrupted by the addition of negatively charged or neutral peptides. In DNA-driven LLPS, both positively and negatively charged peptide ligands can perturb phase separation. Our findings demonstrate the importance of electrostatic interactions in HP1α LLPS where binding partners can modulate the overall charge of the droplets and screen or enhance hinge region interactions through specific and non-specific effects. Our study illuminates the complex molecular framework that can fine-tune the properties of HP1α and that can contribute to heterochromatin regulation and function.