Introduction Pediatric residents and subspecialty fellows experience a significant number of stressors during training, but they have rarely been self-reported or compared between groups. This qualitative study aimed to identify and compare themes of stressors experienced by pediatric residents and subspecialty fellows at a single large children’s hospital. Materials and methods Using an open-ended survey at single time point for each group, we asked residents and fellows to list the stressors they face in training. The survey data was iteratively analyzed using thematic analysis then quantified by its frequency in each group and compared using a chi-square distribution or a Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Results Twenty-eight of 159 residents (18%) and 38 of 180 fellows (21%) answered the survey question, and an average of 2.8 stressors were identified by each resident and fellow. Two major themes and five major subthemes were shared between both groups. The theme Stressors at Home included the subthemes Difficulty Maintaining Overall Health and External Stressors . The theme Stressors at Work encompassed the subthemes Clinical Stressors Innate to Patient Care, Demanding Workload and Schedule, and Stressors Related to Culture of Work Environment . Within the subthemes, there were differences in categories of stressors between the groups. While there was no statistically significant difference in the distribution of themes, subthemes, or categories of stressors mentioned between groups, in general residents identified stressors associated with lack of autonomy and control whereas fellows focused on clinical uncertainty and complex situations. Conclusions While residents and fellows shared similar themes and subthemes for stressors, there was variability between individual categories. This study identified individual self-reported stressors that can be used by programs to design interventions to improve trainee well-being, but it also implies that programmatic support at different levels of training should be tailored to the target group. KEY MESSAGE At our hospital, we found that some self-reported stressors facing pediatric residents and fellows were common and some unique. Stressors included those that can be eliminated or diminished as well as those that cannot. With knowledge that these disparities exist, training programs should use unique strategies to provide support for the two groups and their stressors.
Background Burnout in pediatric residents is widespread. Certain factors are associated with decreased burnout, such as empathy, self-compassion, mindfulness, and resilience, while perceived stress is associated with increased burnout. Narrative medicine may reduce burnout by its impact on protective and exacerbating factors and can be an active tool to promote wellness. The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate immediate and delayed benefits of a longitudinal narrative medicine intervention for pediatric residents using qualitative and quantitative measures. Materials and Methods We designed a voluntary longitudinal narrative medicine intervention implemented via Zoom teleconferencing software over five months for pediatric residents at Nationwide Children’s Hospital. It consisted of six one-hour long sessions where residents engaged with literature, responded to a writing prompt, and shared their reflections. It was evaluated using open-ended survey questions and established quantitative assessment tools of well-being with validity evidence. Results were compared before the intervention, immediately after, and six months later using one-way ANOVA and multiple linear regression. Qualitative data was analyzed using thematic analysis. Results Twenty-two (14% of eligible) residents participated in at least one session. After the intervention, the following themes emerged for benefits to resident well-being: the ability to Build Community , have an Outlet for Self-Expression , reap Emotional and Mental Health Benefits , and work on Personal Growth . Benefits were sustained even six months later, which has not been shown previously. While there were significant qualitative findings, between all three time points, there was no change in any quantitative well-being measures. Conclusion Our longitudinal narrative medicine pilot study showed meaningful sustained qualitative benefits, though no quantitative changes, in measured well-being outcomes that have been previously associated with lower resident burnout. While not a panacea, narrative medicine can be a useful strategy for residency programs to improve pediatric resident well-being even after completion of planned interventions. Key Message We used a mixed-methods approach to assess the effects of a longitudinal narrative medicine intervention on well-being in pediatric residents. Open-ended responses indicated that residents found utility in and appreciated the intervention and experienced sustained improvements in their mental and emotional health, though the sample size was likely too small to show quantitative changes in well-being measures. Narrative medicine is not a panacea, but it can be a useful tool to provide to ped...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.